Literature DB >> 30870104

A comparison of hourly with annual air pollutant emissions: Implications for estimating acute exposure and public health risk.

Michael J Stewart1, James Hirtz2, George M Woodall1, Chelsea A Weitekamp1,3, Kelley Spence2.   

Abstract

Health risks from air pollutants are evaluated by comparing chronic (i.e., an average over 1 yr or greater) or acute (typically 1-hr) exposure estimates with chemical- and duration-specific reference values or standards. When estimating long-term pollutant concentrations via exposure modeling, facility-level annual average emission rates are readily available as model inputs for most air pollutants. In contrast, there are far fewer facility-level hour-by-hour emission rates available for many of these same pollutants. In this report, we first analyze hour-by-hour emission rates for total reduced sulfur (TRS) compounds from eight kraft pulp mill operations. This data set is used to demonstrate discrepancies between estimating exposure based on a single TRS emission rate that has been calculated as the mean of all operating hours of the year, as opposed to reported hourly emission rates. A similar analysis is then performed using reported hourly emission rates for sulfur dioxide (SO2) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) from three power generating units from a U.S. power plant. Results demonstrate greater variability at kraft pulp mill operations, with ratios of reported hourly to average hourly TRS emissions ranging from less than 1 to greater than 160 during routine facility operations. Thus, if fluctuations in hourly emission rates are not accounted for, over- or underestimates of hourly exposure, and thus acute health risk, may occur. In addition to this analysis, we also demonstrate an additional challenge when assessing health risk based on hourly exposures: the lack of human health reference values based on 1-hr exposures. Implications: Largely due to the lack of reported hourly emission rate data for many air pollutants, an hourly average emission rate (calculated from an annual emission rate) is often used when modeling the potential for acute health risk. We calculated ratios between reported hourly and hourly average emission rates from pulp and paper mills and a U.S. power plant to demonstrate that if not considered, hourly fluctuations in emissions could result in an over- or underestimation of exposure and risk. We also demonstrate the lack of 1-hr human health reference values meant to be protective of the general population, including children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30870104      PMCID: PMC7374520          DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2019.1593261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  10 in total

1.  Acute health reference values: overview, perspective, and current forecast of needs.

Authors:  George M Woodall
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2005 Jun 11-25

2.  Pilot study investigating ambient air toxics emissions near a Canadian kraft pulp and paper facility in Pictou County, Nova Scotia.

Authors:  Emma Hoffman; Judith R Guernsey; Tony R Walker; Jong Sung Kim; Kate Sherren; Pantelis Andreou
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Health effects of working in pulp and paper mills: malignant diseases.

Authors:  K Torén; B Persson; G Wingren
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 4.  Health effects of working in pulp and paper mills: exposure, obstructive airways diseases, hypersensitivity reactions, and cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  K Torén; S Hagberg; H Westberg
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  Proximity to pulp and paper mills and wheezing symptoms among adolescents in North Carolina.

Authors:  Maria C Mirabelli; Steve Wing
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 6.498

6.  Airways inflammation among workers in a paper industry.

Authors:  R Rylander; J Thorn; R Attefors
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 16.671

7.  Skin disease in paper mill workers.

Authors:  F H W Jungbauer; G J Lensen; J W Groothoff; P J Coenraads
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.611

8.  Manganese testing under a clean air act test rule and the application of resultant data in risk assessments.

Authors:  Darcie Smith; George M Woodall; Annie M Jarabek; William K Boyes
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.294

9.  Cohort mortality study of Swedish pulp and paper mill workers-nonmalignant diseases.

Authors:  Eva Andersson; Bodil Persson; Ing-Liss Bryngelsson; Anders Magnuson; Kjell Torén; Gun Wingren; Håkan Westberg
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.024

10.  Interpreting Mobile and Handheld Air Sensor Readings in Relation to Air Quality Standards and Health Effect Reference Values: Tackling the Challenges.

Authors:  George M Woodall; Mark D Hoover; Ronald Williams; Kristen Benedict; Martin Harper; Jhy-Charm Soo; Annie M Jarabek; Michael J Stewart; James S Brown; Janis E Hulla; Motria Caudill; Andrea L Clements; Amanda Kaufman; Alison J Parker; Martha Keating; David Balshaw; Kevin Garrahan; Laureen Burton; Sheila Batka; Vijay S Limaye; Pertti J Hakkinen; Bob Thompson
Journal:  Atmosphere (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.686

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  An Examination of National Cancer Risk Based on Monitored Hazardous Air Pollutants.

Authors:  Chelsea A Weitekamp; McKayla Lein; Madeleine Strum; Mark Morris; Ted Palma; Darcie Smith; Lukas Kerr; Michael J Stewart
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 9.031

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.