Literature DB >> 30870100

In search of an imaginary enemy: Catholic collective narcissism and the endorsement of gender conspiracy beliefs.

Marta Marchlewska1, Aleksandra Cichocka2, Filip Łozowski3, Paulina Górska3, Mikołaj Winiewski3.   

Abstract

Gender studies have often been criticized for undermining family and religious values. In this paper, we argue that these criticisms exhibit the characteristics of conspiracy theories. We define gender conspiracy beliefs as convictions that gender studies and gender-equality activists represent an ideology secretly designed to harm traditional values and social arrangements. In two studies conducted among Catholics in Poland (Study 1 N= 1019; Study 2 N= 223), we examined the prevalence of gender conspiracy beliefs and their psychological concomitants. We hypothesized that gender conspiracy beliefs should be associated with a defensive identification with one's religious group, captured by religious collective narcissism. In both studies, Catholic collective narcissism was demonstrated to be a robust predictor of gender conspiracy beliefs. We additionally demonstrated that Catholic collective narcissism predicted outgroup hostility, and this effect was mediated by gender conspiracy beliefs. We discuss the implications for gender-based prejudice.

Keywords:  Collective narcissism; conspiracy beliefs; outgroup hostility; religiosity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30870100     DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2019.1586637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-4545


  6 in total

Review 1.  Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.

Authors:  Jay J Van Bavel; Katherine Baicker; Paulo S Boggio; Valerio Capraro; Aleksandra Cichocka; Mina Cikara; Molly J Crockett; Alia J Crum; Karen M Douglas; James N Druckman; John Drury; Oeindrila Dube; Naomi Ellemers; Eli J Finkel; James H Fowler; Michele Gelfand; Shihui Han; S Alexander Haslam; Jolanda Jetten; Shinobu Kitayama; Dean Mobbs; Lucy E Napper; Dominic J Packer; Gordon Pennycook; Ellen Peters; Richard E Petty; David G Rand; Stephen D Reicher; Simone Schnall; Azim Shariff; Linda J Skitka; Sandra Susan Smith; Cass R Sunstein; Nassim Tabri; Joshua A Tucker; Sander van der Linden; Paul van Lange; Kim A Weeden; Michael J A Wohl; Jamil Zaki; Sean R Zion; Robb Willer
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-04-30

2.  Pylons ablaze: Examining the role of 5G COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and support for violence.

Authors:  Daniel Jolley; Jenny L Paterson
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2020-06-21

3.  COVID-19: Why Do People Refuse Vaccination? The Role of Social Identities and Conspiracy Beliefs: Evidence from Nationwide Samples of Polish Adults.

Authors:  Marta Marchlewska; Katarzyna Hamer; Maria Baran; Paulina Górska; Krzysztof Kaniasty
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10

4.  Does religion predict coronavirus conspiracy beliefs? Centrality of religiosity, religious fundamentalism, and COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs.

Authors:  Paweł Łowicki; Marta Marchlewska; Zuzanna Molenda; Adam Karakula; Dagmara Szczepańska
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2021-11-27

5.  The devil is not as black as he is painted? On the positive relationship between food industry conspiracy beliefs and conscious food choices.

Authors:  Marta Marchlewska; Dagmara Szczepańska; Adam Karakula; Zuzanna Molenda; Marta Rogoza; Dominika Maison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  The usual suspects: How psychological motives and thinking styles predict the endorsement of well-known and COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs.

Authors:  Vukašin Gligorić; Margarida Moreira da Silva; Selin Eker; Nieke van Hoek; Ella Nieuwenhuijzen; Uljana Popova; Golnar Zeighami
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2021-05-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.