Literature DB >> 30869959

Leveraging the Open Science Framework in clinical psychological assessment research.

Jennifer L Tackett1, Cassandra M Brandes1, Kathleen W Reardon1.   

Abstract

The last decade has seen enormous advances in research transparency in psychology. One of these advances has been the creation of a common interface for openness across the sciences-the Open Science Framework (OSF). While social, personality, and cognitive psychologists have been at the fore in participating in open practices on the OSF, clinical psychology has trailed behind. In this article, we discuss the advantages and special considerations for clinical assessment researchers' participation in open science broadly, and specifically in using the OSF for these purposes. We use several studies from our lab to illustrate the uses of the OSF for psychological studies, as well as the process of implementing this tool in assessment research. Among these studies are an archival assessment study, a project using an extensive unpublished assessment battery, and one in which we developed a short-form assessment instrument. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30869959     DOI: 10.1037/pas0000583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  8 in total

1.  The registration continuum in clinical science: A guide toward transparent practices.

Authors:  Stephen D Benning; Rachel L Bachrach; Edward A Smith; Andrew J Freeman; Aidan G C Wright
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2019-08

2.  Open science practices for eating disorders research.

Authors:  Natasha L Burke; Guido K W Frank; Anja Hilbert; Thomas Hildebrandt; Kelly L Klump; Jennifer J Thomas; Tracey D Wade; B Timothy Walsh; Shirley B Wang; Ruth Striegel Weissman
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 5.791

3.  Now is the time to assess the effects of open science practiceswith randomized control trials.

Authors:  Jerry Suls; Alexander J Rothman; Karina W Davidson
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2021-11-22

4.  An Intelligent Clinical Psychological Assessment Method Based on AHP-LSSVR Model.

Authors:  Junli Su; Dongyang Wang
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-30

5.  Measuring conscientiousness in Brazil and disentangling its relationships with subjective well-being, and academic involvement.

Authors:  Amanda M Rocha; Cristian Zanon; Brent W Roberts
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-08-01

6.  The relationship between daily positive future thinking and past-week suicidal ideation in youth: An experience sampling study.

Authors:  Olivia J Kirtley; Ginette Lafit; Thomas Vaessen; Jeroen Decoster; Catherine Derom; Sinan Gülöksüz; Marc De Hert; Nele Jacobs; Claudia Menne-Lothmann; Bart P F Rutten; Evert Thiery; Jim van Os; Ruud van Winkel; Marieke Wichers; Inez Myin-Germeys
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 5.435

7.  Open Science is for Aging Research, Too.

Authors:  Derek M Isaacowitz; Majse Lind
Journal:  Innov Aging       Date:  2019-09-04

Review 8.  Using primary care databases for addiction research: An introduction and overview of strengths and weaknesses.

Authors:  Daniel Kotz; Amy O'Donnell; Sterling McPherson; Kyla H Thomas
Journal:  Addict Behav Rep       Date:  2022-01-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.