Literature DB >> 30869956

Does the number of response options matter? Psychometric perspectives using personality questionnaire data.

Leonard J Simms1, Kerry Zelazny1, Trevor F Williams1, Lee Bernstein1.   

Abstract

Psychological tests typically include a response scale whose purpose it is to organize and constrain the options available to respondents and facilitate scoring. One such response scale is the Likert scale, which initially was introduced to have a specific 5-point form. In practice, such scales have varied considerably in the nature and number of response options. However, relatively little consensus exists regarding several questions that have emerged regarding the use of Likert-type items. First, is there a "psychometrically optimal" number of response options? Second, is it better to include an even or odd number of response options? Finally, do visual analog items offer any advantages over Likert-type items? We studied these questions in a sample of 1,358 undergraduates who were randomly assigned to groups to complete a common personality measure using response scales ranging from 2 to 11 options, and a visual analog condition. Results revealed attenuated psychometric precision for response scales with 2 to 5 response options; interestingly, however, the criterion validity results did not follow this pattern. Also, no psychometric advantages were revealed for any response scales beyond 6 options, including visual analogs. These results have important implications for psychological scale development. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30869956     DOI: 10.1037/pas0000648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  23 in total

1.  Statistical Guideline #1. Avoid Creating Categorical Variables from Continuous Variables.

Authors:  Suzanne C Segerstrom
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2019-08

Review 2.  Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.

Authors:  Lee Anna Clark; David Watson
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2019-03-21

3.  The Case for Cognitive Interviewing in Survey Item Validation: A Useful Approach for Improving the Measurement and Assessment of Substance Use Disorders.

Authors:  Cassandra L Boness; Kenneth J Sher
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.582

4.  Quantifying Behavioral Sensation Seeking With the Aroma Choice Task.

Authors:  Brandon G Oberlin; Nolan E Ramer; Sage M Bates; Yitong I Shen; Jeremy S Myslinski; David A Kareken; Melissa A Cyders
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2019-07-27

5.  Comparing two neurocognitive models of self-control during dietary decisions.

Authors:  Danielle Cosme; Rita M Ludwig; Elliot T Berkman
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Validation of Articulatory Rate and Imprecision Judgments in Speech of Individuals With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Ashley A Waito; Farah Wehbe; Reeman Marzouqah; Carolina Barnett; Sanjana Shellikeri; Cindy Cui; Agessandro Abrahao; Lorne Zinman; Jordan R Green; Yana Yunusova
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Measurement of the problematic usage of the Internet unidimensional quasitrait continuum with item response theory.

Authors:  Jeggan Tiego; Christine Lochner; Konstantinos Ioannidis; Matthias Brand; Dan J Stein; Murat Yücel; Jon E Grant; Samuel R Chamberlain
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2021-04-08

8.  Fear of Missing Out, Mental Wellbeing, and Social Connectedness: A Seven-Day Social Media Abstinence Trial.

Authors:  Lorna Brown; Daria J Kuss
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Distress and Type 2 Diabetes Self-Care: Putting the Pieces Together.

Authors:  Claire J Hoogendoorn; Clyde B Schechter; Maria M Llabre; Elizabeth A Walker; Jeffrey S Gonzalez
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2021-10-04

10.  Psychometric validation and refinement of the Interoception Sensory Questionnaire (ISQ) in adolescents and adults on the autism spectrum.

Authors:  Evan Suzman; Zachary J Williams; Jacob I Feldman; Michelle Failla; Carissa J Cascio; Mark T Wallace; Maria Niarchou; James S Sutcliffe; Ericka Wodka; Tiffany G Woynaroski
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 6.476

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.