Alexander Sun1, Chen Hu2,3, Stuart J Wong4, Elizabeth Gore4, Gregory Videtic5, Swati Dutta6, Mohan Suntharalingam7, Yuhchyau Chen8, Laurie E Gaspar9, Hak Choy10. 1. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. 5. Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio. 6. Michigan Cancer Research Consortium CCOP, Ann Arbor. 7. University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore. 8. University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. 9. University of Colorado, Denver. 10. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Brain metastasis (BM) rates are high in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), approaching rates seen in small cell lung cancer, where prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is standard of care. Although PCI decreases the incidence of BM in LA-NSCLC, a survival advantage has not yet been shown. OBJECTIVE: To determine if PCI improves survival in LA-NSCLC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0214 was a randomized phase 3 clinical trial in stage III NSCLC stratified by stage (IIIA vs IIIB), histologic characteristics (nonsquamous vs squamous) and therapy (no surgery vs surgery). The study took place at 291 institutions in the United States, Canada, and internationally. Of 356 patients with stage III NSCLC entered onto this study, 16 were ineligible; therefore, 340 patients were randomized. INTERVENTION FOR CLINICAL TRIALS: Observation vs PCI. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The secondary end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and incidence of BM. RESULTS: Of the 340 total participants, mean (SD) age was 61 years; 213 of the participants were men and 127 were women. The median follow-up time was 2.1 years for all patients, and 9.2 years for living patients. The OS for PCI was not significantly better than observation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.63-1.06; P = .12; 5- and 10-year rates, 24.7% and 17.6% vs 26.0% and 13.3%, respectively), while the DFS (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.97; P = .03; 5- and 10-year rates, 19.0% and 12.6% vs 16.1% and 7.5% for PCI vs observation) and BM (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24-0.77; P = .003; 5- and 10-year rates, 16.7% vs 28.3% for PCI vs observation) were significantly different. Patients in the PCI arm were 57% less likely to develop BM than those in the observation arm. Younger patients (<60 years) and patients with nonsquamous disease developed more BM. On multivariable analysis, PCI was associated with decreased BM and improved DFS, but not improved OS. Multivariable analysis within the nonsurgical arm suggests that PCI effectively prolongs OS, DFS, and BM. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In patients with stage III LA-NSCLC without progression of disease after therapy, PCI decreased the 5- and 10-year rate of BM and improved 5- and 10-year DFS, but did not improve OS. Although this study did not meet its primary end point, the long-term results reveal many important findings that will benefit future trials. Identifying the appropriate patient population and a safe intervention is critical. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00048997.
IMPORTANCE: Brain metastasis (BM) rates are high in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), approaching rates seen in small cell lung cancer, where prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is standard of care. Although PCI decreases the incidence of BM in LA-NSCLC, a survival advantage has not yet been shown. OBJECTIVE: To determine if PCI improves survival in LA-NSCLC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0214 was a randomized phase 3 clinical trial in stage III NSCLC stratified by stage (IIIA vs IIIB), histologic characteristics (nonsquamous vs squamous) and therapy (no surgery vs surgery). The study took place at 291 institutions in the United States, Canada, and internationally. Of 356 patients with stage III NSCLC entered onto this study, 16 were ineligible; therefore, 340 patients were randomized. INTERVENTION FOR CLINICAL TRIALS: Observation vs PCI. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The secondary end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and incidence of BM. RESULTS: Of the 340 total participants, mean (SD) age was 61 years; 213 of the participants were men and 127 were women. The median follow-up time was 2.1 years for all patients, and 9.2 years for living patients. The OS for PCI was not significantly better than observation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.63-1.06; P = .12; 5- and 10-year rates, 24.7% and 17.6% vs 26.0% and 13.3%, respectively), while the DFS (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.97; P = .03; 5- and 10-year rates, 19.0% and 12.6% vs 16.1% and 7.5% for PCI vs observation) and BM (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24-0.77; P = .003; 5- and 10-year rates, 16.7% vs 28.3% for PCI vs observation) were significantly different. Patients in the PCI arm were 57% less likely to develop BM than those in the observation arm. Younger patients (<60 years) and patients with nonsquamous disease developed more BM. On multivariable analysis, PCI was associated with decreased BM and improved DFS, but not improved OS. Multivariable analysis within the nonsurgical arm suggests that PCI effectively prolongs OS, DFS, and BM. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In patients with stage III LA-NSCLC without progression of disease after therapy, PCI decreased the 5- and 10-year rate of BM and improved 5- and 10-year DFS, but did not improve OS. Although this study did not meet its primary end point, the long-term results reveal many important findings that will benefit future trials. Identifying the appropriate patient population and a safe intervention is critical. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00048997.
Authors: Bruce Keith; Mark Vincent; Larry Stitt; Anna Tomiak; Richard Malthaner; Edward Yu; Pauline Truong; Richard Inculet; Michael Lefcoe; A Rashid Dar; Walter Kocha; Ian Craig Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: R Arriagada; T Le Chevalier; E Quoix; P Ruffie; H de Cremoux; J Y Douillard; M Tarayre; J P Pignon; A Laplanche Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1991-06 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Kimberly L Johung; Norman Yeh; Neil B Desai; Terence M Williams; Tim Lautenschlaeger; Nils D Arvold; Matthew S Ning; Albert Attia; Christine M Lovly; Sarah Goldberg; Kathryn Beal; James B Yu; Brian D Kavanagh; Veronica L Chiang; D Ross Camidge; Joseph N Contessa Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: C A Perez; T F Pajak; P Rubin; J R Simpson; M Mohiuddin; L W Brady; R Perez-Tamayo; M Rotman Journal: Cancer Date: 1987-06-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Harvey J Mamon; Beow Yong Yeap; Pasi A Jänne; Jason Reblando; Sarah Shrager; Michael T Jaklitsch; Steven Mentzer; Jeanne M Lukanich; David J Sugarbaker; Elizabeth H Baldini; Stuart Berman; Arthur Skarin; Raphael Bueno Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hannah Carolan; Alexander Y Sun; Andrea Bezjak; Qi-Long Yi; David Payne; Gabrielle Kane; John Waldron; Natasha Leighl; Ronald Feld; Ronald Burkes; Shaf Keshavjee; Frances Shepherd Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2005-02-02 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: K S Albain; V W Rusch; J J Crowley; T W Rice; A T Turrisi; J K Weick; V A Lonchyna; C A Presant; R J McKenna; D R Gandara Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1995-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A P Meert; M Paesmans; T Berghmans; B Martin; C Mascaux; F Vallot; J M Verdebout; J J Lafitte; J P Sculier Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2001-06-19 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Andrew M Baschnagel; Jacob H Elnaggar; Haley J VanBeek; Ashley C Kromke; Justin H Skiba; Saakshi Kaushik; Lindsey Abel; Paul A Clark; Colin A Longhurst; Kwangok P Nickel; Ticiana A Leal; Shuang G Zhao; Randall J Kimple Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2021-08-19 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: John H Suh; Rupesh Kotecha; Samuel T Chao; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Arjun Sahgal; Eric L Chang Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Andrew M Baschnagel; Saakshi Kaushik; Arda Durmaz; Steve Goldstein; Irene M Ong; Lindsey Abel; Paul A Clark; Zafer Gurel; Ticiana Leal; Darya Buehler; Gopal Iyer; Jacob G Scott; Randall J Kimple Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 4.379