Literature DB >> 30869143

Predicting 90-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Spinal Metastatic Disease: Development and Internal Validation.

Aditya V Karhade1, Quirina C B S Thio1, Paul T Ogink1, Christopher M Bono1, Marco L Ferrone2, Kevin S Oh3, Philip J Saylor4, Andrew J Schoenfeld2, John H Shin5, Mitchel B Harris1, Joseph H Schwab1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing prevalence of metastatic disease has been accompanied by increasing rates of surgical intervention. Current tools have poor to fair predictive performance for intermediate (90-d) and long-term (1-yr) mortality.
OBJECTIVE: To develop predictive algorithms for spinal metastatic disease at these time points and to provide patient-specific explanations of the predictions generated by these algorithms.
METHODS: Retrospective review was conducted at 2 large academic medical centers to identify patients undergoing initial operative management for spinal metastatic disease between January 2000 and December 2016. Five models (penalized logistic regression, random forest, stochastic gradient boosting, neural network, and support vector machine) were developed to predict 90-d and 1-yr mortality.
RESULTS: Overall, 732 patients were identified with 90-d and 1-yr mortality rates of 181 (25.1%) and 385 (54.3%), respectively. The stochastic gradient boosting algorithm had the best performance for 90-d mortality and 1-yr mortality. On global variable importance assessment, albumin, primary tumor histology, and performance status were the 3 most important predictors of 90-d mortality. The final models were incorporated into an open access web application able to provide predictions as well as patient-specific explanations of the results generated by the algorithms. The application can be found at https://sorg-apps.shinyapps.io/spinemetssurvival/.
CONCLUSION: Preoperative estimation of 90-d and 1-yr mortality was achieved with assessment of more flexible modeling techniques such as machine learning. Integration of these models into applications and patient-centered explanations of predictions represent opportunities for incorporation into healthcare systems as decision tools in the future.
Copyright © 2019 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1-year; 90-day; Explanation; Machine learning; Prognosis; Spine metastasis; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30869143     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  29 in total

1.  Prognosticating outcomes and survival for patients with lumbar spinal metastases: Results of a bayesian regression analysis.

Authors:  Andrew J Schoenfeld; Marco L Ferrone; Joseph H Schwab; Justin A Blucher; Lauren B Barton; Mitchel B Harris; James D Kang
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 2.  Predictive modeling in spine surgery.

Authors:  Azeem Tariq Malik; Safdar N Khan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

3.  Can machine learning models predict failure of revision total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Christian Klemt; Wayne Brian Cohen-Levy; Matthew Gerald Robinson; Jillian C Burns; Kyle Alpaugh; Ingwon Yeo; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Estimating survival and choosing treatment for spinal metastases: Do spine surgeons agree with each other?

Authors:  Quirina C B S Thio; Nuno Rui Paulino Pereira; Olivier van Wulfften Palthe; Daniel M Sciubba; Jos A M Bramer; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-11-27

5.  SORG algorithm to predict 3- and 12-month survival in metastatic spinal disease: a cross-sectional population-based retrospective study.

Authors:  Gregory Zegarek; Enrico Tessitore; Etienne Chaboudez; Aria Nouri; Karl Schaller; Renato Gondar
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.816

6.  Artificial intelligence in predicting early-onset adjacent segment degeneration following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Samuel S Rudisill; Alexander L Hornung; J Nicolás Barajas; Jack J Bridge; G Michael Mallow; Wylie Lopez; Arash J Sayari; Philip K Louie; Garrett K Harada; Youping Tao; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Matthew W Colman; Frank M Phillips; Howard S An; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 2.721

7.  Patient experiences of decision-making in the treatment of spinal metastases: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Emma C Lape; Jeffrey N Katz; Justin A Blucher; Angela T Chen; Genevieve S Silva; Joseph H Schwab; Tracy A Balboni; Elena Losina; Andrew J Schoenfeld
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  A Natural History of Patients Treated Operatively and Nonoperatively for Spinal Metastases Over 2 Years Following Treatment: Survival and Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Grace X Xiong; Miles W A Fisher; Joseph H Schwab; Andrew K Simpson; Lananh Nguyen; Daniel G Tobert; Tracy A Balboni; John H Shin; Marco L Ferrone; Andrew J Schoenfeld
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Prediction of Major Complications and Readmission After Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Machine Learning-Driven Approach.

Authors:  Akash A Shah; Sai K Devana; Changhee Lee; Amador Bugarin; Elizabeth L Lord; Arya N Shamie; Don Y Park; Mihaela van der Schaar; Nelson F SooHoo
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.210

10.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Surgical Intervention for Spinal Metastases: A Model-Based Evaluation.

Authors:  Andrew J Schoenfeld; Gordon P Bensen; Justin A Blucher; Marco L Ferrone; Tracy A Balboni; Joseph H Schwab; Mitchel B Harris; Jeffrey N Katz; Elena Losina
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.