| Literature DB >> 30869130 |
Karen R Kilcoyne1, Rod T Mitchell1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Overall, the incidence of male reproductive disorders has increased in recent decades. Testicular development during fetal life is crucial for subsequent male reproductive function. Non-genomic factors such as environmental chemicals, pharmaceuticals and lifestyle have been proposed to impact on human fetal testicular development resulting in subsequent effects on male reproductive health. Whilst experimental studies using animal models have provided support for this hypothesis, more recently a number of experimental studies using human tissues and cells have begun to translate these findings to determine direct human relevance. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The objective of this systematic review was to provide a comprehensive description of the evidence for effects of prenatal exposure(s) on human fetal testis development and function. We present the effects of environmental, pharmaceutical and lifestyle factors in experimental systems involving exposure of human fetal testis tissues and cells. Comparison is made with existing epidemiological data primarily derived from a recent meta-analysis. SEARCHEntities:
Keywords: Leydig cell; Sertoli cell; endocrine disruptor; environmental chemical; germ cell; human fetus; pharmaceutical; steroidogenesis; testis; testosterone
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30869130 PMCID: PMC6601394 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmz004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Reprod Update ISSN: 1355-4786 Impact factor: 15.610
Figure 1Testicular development and function during fetal life and reproductive disorders associated with testicular dysgenesis syndrome. DHT, dihydrotestosterone.
Figure 2Comparison of approaches to comparing the effects of environmental and pharmaceutical exposures on human fetal testis development and function. TGCC, testicular germ cell cancer.
Key considerations for the assessment of human studies using epidemiological, or experimental (xenograft or in-vitro) approaches.
| Epidemiology | Xenograft | In vitro | |
|
| Potential limitation—population/tissue used may be unrepresentative of target population/tissue | ||
|
Is the population studied representative of the target population (e.g. pregnant women)? |
Is the tissue representative of the target population (e.g. fetal tissue)? |
Is the tissue representative of the target population (e.g. fetal tissue or cells)? | |
|
| Potential limitation—agent under investigation may be not be representative of the exposure under investigation (e.g. metabolite) or there may be additional confounding agents | ||
|
Is the relevant agent being measured in the population? Is there potential for confounding by other/similar exposures? |
Is the investigated agent relevant to potential human exposure? Is it metabolized in the host animal to an active/inactive form (e.g. DBP–MBP)? |
Is the investigated agent relevant to potential human exposure? Is the active agent or metabolite added to the medium? | |
|
| Potential limitation—assessment of exposure in epidemiological studies or regimen used in experimental studies may not accurately reflect true human exposure | ||
|
Is the exposure measured in the subjects (e.g. indirect measurement of fetal exposure through maternal serum/urine) or indirectly assessed (e.g. self-report) and does this accurately capture actual fetal exposure? |
Is the dose, frequency, duration and route of exposure? representative of human exposure (e.g. pharmaceuticals)? |
Is the concentration of agent placed in the media representative of human levels (e.g. maternal serum, amniotic fluid, fetal serum) and/or human dosing regimen? | |
|
| Potential limitation—timing of assessment of exposure in epidemiological studies or developmental stage of tissue used in experimental studies may not accurately reflect the relevant stage | ||
|
Is exposure measured at the appropriate developmental stage (e.g. trimester of fetal life or MPW)? Does timing and frequency of measurement accurately reflect internal exposure? |
Is the transplanted tissue at the same developmental stage (e.g. trimester of fetal life or MPW)? Does the experimental system maintain tissue development and function? |
Is the tissue cultured at the same developmental stage (e.g. trimester of fetal life or MPW)? Does the experimental system maintain tissue development and function? | |
|
| Potential limitation—the effects of exposure may be measured directly or through association and direct effects of exposure may not result in clinical consequences | ||
|
Is there a direct clinical association with fetal exposure (e.g. cryptorchidism) or is it a surrogate marker for clinical effects (e.g. AGD)? What is the magnitude of effect and is it statistically significant? Is there a plausible mechanism? |
Is the effect clinically relevant (e.g. potential for reduced testosterone to induce cryptorchidism)? What is the magnitude of effect and is it statistically significant? Has the mechanism for the effect been defined? |
Is the effect relevant to Is the effect clinically relevant (e.g. potential for reduced testosterone to induce cryptorchidism)? What is the magnitude of effect and is it statistically significant? Has the mechanism for the effect been defined? | |
Figure 3Prisma flow diagram for identification and selection of studies. # Supplementary Table S2; * Supplementary Table S3.
Figure 4Number of publications involving experimental exposures to environmental agents and pharmaceuticals using human fetal testis tissues or cells. DES, diethylstilboestrol. For (A) ‘All Publications’, a breakdown of the investigated agents into (B) environmental, (C) pharmaceutical and (D) lifestyle is included. NB: Some publications include exposure to several different agents.
Summary of experimental studies investigating effects of phthalate exposure in human fetal testis tissue.
| Model and regimen | Results | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure | Model | Fetal age (weeks) | Dose | Route | Regimen | Supplemented | Testosterone | AMH | INSL3 | Germ cells | Study | Comments |
| DBP | Xenograft | 14–20 | 500 mg/kg/d | Oral | 4 or 21 days | hCG | ↓Gonocytes, ↑MNG | van den Dreische (2015b) | ||||
| Xenograft | 14–20 | 500 mg/kg/d | Oral | 4 or 21 days | hCG | ↔ | ↔ |
| ||||
| Xenograft | 16–22 | 500 mg/kg/d | Oral | 14 days | hCG | ↔ | ↔ |
| ||||
| Xenograft | 10–24 | 100–500 mg/kg/d | Oral | 24–72 h | Nil | ↔ | ↑MNG |
| ||||
|
| 15-20 | 10−3 M | Media | 24-48 h | Basal/hCG/22 R-OH | ↔ |
| |||||
| MBP | Xenograft | 14–20 | 500 mg/kg/d | Oral | 4 or 21 days | hCG | ↔ |
| ||||
|
| 15–20 | 10−3 M | Media | 24–48 h | Basal/hCG/22 R-OH | ↔ |
| |||||
| MEHP |
| 7–12 | 10−4 M | Media | 72 h | LH | ↔ | ↔ | ↓GC (40%) |
| ||
|
| 7–12 | 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | LH | ↔ | ↔ | ↔GC number |
| |||
|
| 7–12 | 10−6 M | Media | 72 h | LH | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ | ↔GC number |
| ||
|
| 7–12 | 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | Nil | ↑Apoptosis (~45%)* |
| *Gonocytes | ||||
Significant effects associated with adverse outcomes are highlighted in red, no change or significant effects not expected to result in adverse outcomes are highlighted in green.
MNG, multinuclear gonocytes; GC, germ cells; 22 R-HO, 22 R-hydroxycholesterol; SV, seminal vesicle.
Summary of experimental studies investigating effects of bisphenol exposure in human fetal testis tissue.
| Model and regimen | Results | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure | Model | Fetal age (weeks) | Dose | Route | Regimen | Supplemented | Testosterone | AMH | Insl3 | Germ cells | Study | Comments |
| BPA |
| 6–11 | 10−5 M | Media | 24–72 h | LH | ↓ (40–50%) |
| ||||
|
| 6–11 | 10−8 to 10−5 M | Media | 24–72 h | Nil | ↓ (20–50%)* |
| *(10−8 not significant at 24 h) | ||||
|
| 6–11 | 10−8 to 10−5 M | Media | 24–72 h | LH | ↔ |
| |||||
|
| 6–11 | 10−8 to 10−5 M | Media | 24–72 h | Nil | ↓ (20–50%) | N-Tumba Byn (2012) | |||||
|
| 6–11 | 10−12 M | Media | 24–72 h | Nil | ↔ | N-Tumba Byn (2012) | |||||
|
| 6–12 | 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | LH | ↓ |
| 70% ↑ apoptotic gonocytes | ||||
|
| 6–12 | 10−8 to 10−6 M | Media | 72 h | LH | ↔ |
| |||||
|
| 7–12 | 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | Nil | ↓ (70%) | ↔ | ↓ | Ben Mamaar (2015) | |||
|
| 7–12 | 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↓ (60%) | ↔ | ↔ | Ben Mamaar (2015) | |||
|
| 7–12 | 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | LH | ↓ (30%) | ↔ | ↔ | Ben Mamaar (2015) | |||
|
| 7–12 | 10−8 to 10−6 M | Media | 72h | LH | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ | Ben Mamaar (2015) | |||
|
| 7–12 | 10−8 to 10−6 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ | Ben Mamaar (2015) | |||
|
| 7–12 | 10−8 to 10−6 M | Media | 72 h | Nil | ↔** | ↔ | ↔*** | Ben Mamaar (2015) | **30% ↓ (10−8), ***70% ↓ (10−8) and 60% ↓ (10−5) | ||
|
| 10–12 | 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↓ (60%) |
| |||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−6 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| |||||
| Xenograft | 9–11 | 10−5 M | Drinking Water | 5 weeks | hCG | ↔ | ↓ (19%)# |
| #19% ↓ gonocytes (↑spermatogonia) | |||
| Xenograft | 14–18 | 0.5, 50 ug/kg | Oral Gavage | 5 weeks | hCG | ↔ |
| |||||
| BPB |
| 10–12 | 10−5 to 10−4 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↓ (25–90%) |
| ||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−8 to 10−6 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| |||||
| BPE |
| 10–12 | 10−4 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↓ (80%) |
| ||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−7 to 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| |||||
| BPF |
| 6–11 | 10−8 M | Media | 72 h | Nil | ↔ |
| ||||
|
| 6–11 | 10−6 to 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | Nil | ↓ (30–40%) |
| |||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−4 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↓ (60%) |
| |||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−8 to 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| |||||
| BPS |
| 6–11 | 10−8 to 10−7 M | Media | 72 h | Nil | ↔ |
| ||||
|
| 6–11 | 10−6 to 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | Nil | ↓ (50%) |
| |||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−5 to 10−4 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↓(20–85%) |
| |||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−8 to 10−6 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| |||||
Significant effects associated with adverse outcomes are highlighted in red, no change or significant effects not expected to result in adverse outcomes are highlighted in green.
Summary of experimental studies investigating effects of pesticide exposure in human fetal testis tissue.
| Model and regimen | Results | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure | Model | Fetal age (weeks) | Dose | Route | Regimen | Supplemented | Testosterone | AMH | INSL3 | Germ cells | Study | Comments |
| 4-Octylphenol |
| 6–12 | 10−5 M | Media | 3 weeks | Nil | ↓ |
| ||||
| Atrazine |
| 10–12 | 10−9 to 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| ||||
| Bitertanol |
| 10–12 | 10−7 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| ||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−6 to 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↓ (50-75%) |
| |||||
| Chlordecone |
| 10–12 | 10−7 to 10−6 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| ||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−5 to 10−4 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↓ (50–90%) |
| |||||
| Dieldrin |
| 14–16 | 10−12 to 10−9 M | Media | 24 h | Nil | ↔ | ↔ |
| |||
|
| 14–16 | 10−12 to 10−9 M | Media | 24 h | LH | ↓ (30%) | ↔ |
| ||||
| Glyphosate |
| 10–12 | 10−8 to 10−4 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| ||||
| Imazalil |
| 10–12 | 10−6 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| ||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−5 to 10−4 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↓ (50–100%) |
| |||||
| Ortho-PhenylPhenol |
| 10–12 | 10−7 to 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| ||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−4 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↓ (40%) |
| |||||
| Prochloraz |
| 10–12 | 10−8 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| ||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−7 to 10−6 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↓ (20–75%) |
| |||||
| Propiconazole |
| 10–12 | 10−7 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| ||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−6 to 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↓ (40–75%) |
| |||||
Significant effects associated with adverse outcomes are highlighted in red, no change or significant effects not expected to result in adverse outcomes are highlighted in green.
Summary of experimental studies investigating effects of analgesic exposure in human fetal testis tissue.
| Model and regimen | Results | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure | Model | Fetal age (weeks) | Dose | Route | Regimen | Supplemented | Testosterone | AMH | INSL3 | Germ Cells | Study | Comments |
| Paracetamol |
| 8–11 | 10−5 M | Media | 7d | Nil | ↓ |
| ||||
|
| 8–12 | 10−5 M | Media | 24–72 h | hCG | ↔ | ↓* | ↔ |
| *Dose response ↓ | ||
|
| 10–12 | 10−5 to 10−4 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| |||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−8 to 10−6 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↑ (25%) |
| |||||
| Xenograft | 14–20 | 60 mg/kg/d | Oral Gavage | 7d | hCG | ↓ |
| |||||
| Xenograft | 14–20 | 60 mg/kg/d | Oral Gavage | 7d | hCG | ↓ |
| |||||
| Xenograft | 14–20 | 60 mg/kg/d | Oral Gavage | 1d | hCG | ↔ |
| |||||
| Xenograft | 14–20 | 60 mg/kg/d | Oral Gavage | 1d | hCG | ↓ |
| |||||
| Ibuprofen | Xenograft | 14–17 | 60 mg/kg/d | Oral Gavage | 7d | hCG | ↔ | ↔ | Ben Mamaar (2017) | |||
| Xenograft | 14–20 | 60 mg/kg/d | Oral Gavage | 1d | hCG | ↓ |
| |||||
| Xenograft | 14–20 | 60 mg/kg/d | Oral Gavage | 7d | hCG | ↓ |
| |||||
|
| 7–8 | 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ | ↓ | Ben Mamaar (2017) | ||||
|
| 8–10 | 10−5 to 10−4 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↓ | ↓ | ↔ | ↔ | Ben Mamaar (2017) | ||
|
| 8–10 | 10−7 to 10−6 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ | ↓** | ↔ | Ben Mamaar (2017) | **10−7 only | ||
|
| 8–11 | 10−5 M | Media | 7d | Nil | ↓*** |
| ***Gonocytes only | ||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−7 to 10−4 M | Media | 24–72 h | hCG | ↔ | ↔* | ↔* | Ben Mamaar (2017) | *Dose response ↓ | ||
|
| 10–12 | 10−8 to 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| |||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−4 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↑ |
| |||||
| Aspirin |
| 8–10 | 10−7 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| ||||
|
| 8–10 | 10−6 to 10−4 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↑ | ↑# | ↔ |
| #Only tested at 10−5 (8–12 GW) | ||
|
| 10–12 | 10−7 to 10−4 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ | ↔## |
| ##Only tested at 10−5 | |||
|
| 10–12 | 10−8 to 10−4 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| |||||
| Indomethacin |
| 8–12 | 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↑ (20%) | ↔### | ↔ |
| ###(10–12 GW) | |
|
| 10–12 | 10−8 to 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| |||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−4 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↑ (20%) |
| |||||
| Aniline |
| 10–12 | 10−8 to 10−5 M | Media | 96 h | hCG | ↔#### |
| ####↓ 20% (10−7) | |||
Significant effects associated with adverse outcomes are highlighted in red, no change or significant effects not expected to result in adverse outcomes are highlighted in green.
Summary of experimental studies investigating effects of lifestyle exposures in human fetal testis tissue.
| Model and regimen | Results | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure | Model | Fetal age (weeks) | Dose | Route | Regimen | Supplemented | Testosterone | AMH | INSL3 | Germ cells | Study | Comments |
| 1,3,7 TMUA |
| 10–12 | 10−9 to 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔* |
| *↓ at 10−7 M | |||
| Alcohol |
| 10–12 | 10−8 to 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↑ (225–275%) |
| Ethanol | |||
| Caffeine |
| 10–12 | 10−9 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↓ (20%) |
| ||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−7 to 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| |||||
| Paraxanthine |
| 10–12 | 10−9 to 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔ |
| ||||
| Smoking |
| 14–19 | 10−6 M | Media | 24 h | Nil | ↑ Apoptosis |
| DMBA-DHD | |||
|
| 7-11 | 10−7 to 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | Nil | ↔ | ↓ (20%)** |
| Cadmium; **10−6 M only | |||
| Theobromine |
| 10–12 | 10−9 to 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | hCG | ↔*** |
| ***↓ at 10−7 M | |||
Significant effects associated with adverse outcomes are highlighted in red, no change or significant effects not expected to result in adverse outcomes are highlighted in green.
Summary of experimental studies investigating effects of pharmaceutical exposure in human fetal testis tissue.
| Model and regimen | Results | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure | Model | Fetal age (weeks) | Dose | Route | Regimen | Supplemented | Testosterone | AMH | INSL3 | Germ cells | Study | Comments |
| DES |
| 6–12 | 10−6 to 10−5 M | Media | 72 h | Nil | ↔ | N-Tumba Byn (2012) | ||||
| Xenograft | 15–19 | 100 ug | Subcut. | 3×/wk for 35 d | hCG | ↔* |
| *↑ SV (60%) | ||||
| Metformin |
| 10–12 | 5 × (10−5 to 10−3) M | Media | 72 h | n/a | ↓ (30–70%)** |
| **5 × 10−5 and 5 × 10−3 M | |||
| Abiraterone | Xenograft | 16–22 | 75mg/kg/day | Oral | 14 d | hCG | ↓ (80%)** | ↔ |
| ***↓ SV (45%) | ||
| Ketoconazole |
| 10–12 | 10−7 M | Media | 96 h | hCG | ↔ |
| ||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−6 to 10−5 M | Media | 96 h | hCG | ↓ (50–90%) |
| |||||
|
| 8–12 | 10−5 M | Media | 24–72 h | hCG | ↓ (20–90%) | ↓ (65%)# | ↓ (90%) |
| #72 h | ||
| Theophylline |
| 10–12 | 10−7 to 10−5 M | Media | 96 h | hCG | ↓ (30–40%) |
| ||||
| Valproate |
| 10–12 | 10−7 to 10−6 M | Media | 96 h | hCG | ↔ |
| ||||
|
| 10–12 | 10−5 M | Media | 96 h | hCG | ↓ (65%) |
| |||||
| Clomiphene |
| 10–12 | 10−6 to 10−5 M | Media | 96 h | hCG | ↓ (25–65%) |
| ||||
Significant effects associated with adverse outcomes are highlighted in red, no change or significant effects not expected to result in adverse outcomes are highlighted in green.