BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have shown that the hematological components of the systemic inflammatory response, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and the systemic immune inflammation index (SII) are efficient prognostic indicators in patients with cancers. Most of the studies did not investigate the reference intervals (RIs) of these parameters in healthy controls. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on healthy ethnic Han population aged between 18 and 79 years of age by retrieving the data from a healthy routine examination center database and laboratory infor-mation system of four participating centers in western China. By following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), RIs of each parameter was established and validated. RESULTS: The analysis included 5,969 healthy subjects. We found that the individual's gender can significantly influence PLR, LMR, and SII (all p < 0.05), but not NLR (p > 0.05). Surprisingly, we also found that with an increase in age, the PLR, LMR, and SII tend to decrease, while NLR remained stable. PLR, LMR, and SII values were significantly higher in the young adults (18 - 64 years) than in old adults (65 - 79 years) (p < 0.001). The RIs of NLR, PLR (adults), PLR (old adults), LMR and SII were 0.88 - 4.0, 49 - 198, 42 - 187, 2.63 - 9.9, 142 x 109/L - 804 x 109/L, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study addresses possible variations and establishes consensus for the NLR, PLR, LMR, and SII RIs for healthy Han Chinese adults in western China. Further, established RIs can standardize clinical applications and promote the use of these indicators into the routine complete blood count report.
BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have shown that the hematological components of the systemic inflammatory response, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and the systemic immune inflammation index (SII) are efficient prognostic indicators in patients with cancers. Most of the studies did not investigate the reference intervals (RIs) of these parameters in healthy controls. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on healthy ethnic Han population aged between 18 and 79 years of age by retrieving the data from a healthy routine examination center database and laboratory infor-mation system of four participating centers in western China. By following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), RIs of each parameter was established and validated. RESULTS: The analysis included 5,969 healthy subjects. We found that the individual's gender can significantly influence PLR, LMR, and SII (all p < 0.05), but not NLR (p > 0.05). Surprisingly, we also found that with an increase in age, the PLR, LMR, and SII tend to decrease, while NLR remained stable. PLR, LMR, and SII values were significantly higher in the young adults (18 - 64 years) than in old adults (65 - 79 years) (p < 0.001). The RIs of NLR, PLR (adults), PLR (old adults), LMR and SII were 0.88 - 4.0, 49 - 198, 42 - 187, 2.63 - 9.9, 142 x 109/L - 804 x 109/L, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study addresses possible variations and establishes consensus for the NLR, PLR, LMR, and SII RIs for healthy Han Chinese adults in western China. Further, established RIs can standardize clinical applications and promote the use of these indicators into the routine complete blood count report.
Authors: Pawel Jarmuzek; Marcin Kot; Piotr Defort; Jakub Stawicki; Julia Komorzycka; Karol Nowak; Anna Tylutka; Agnieszka Zembron-Lacny Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Alejandro García-Núñez; Gema Jiménez-Gómez; Antonio Hidalgo-Molina; Juan Antonio Córdoba-Doña; Antonio León-Jiménez; Antonio Campos-Caro Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Bartosz Dawidowski; Grzegorz Grelecki; Adam Biłgorajski; Piotr Podwalski; Błażej Misiak; Jerzy Samochowiec Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-12-31 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Piotr Defort; Natalia Retkowska-Tomaszewska; Marcin Kot; Paweł Jarmużek; Anna Tylutka; Agnieszka Zembron-Lacny Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Tomasz Urbanowicz; Michał Michalak; Anna Olasińska-Wiśniewska; Michał Rodzki; Anna Witkowska; Aleksandra Gąsecka; Piotr Buczkowski; Bartłomiej Perek; Marek Jemielity Journal: Cells Date: 2022-03-26 Impact factor: 6.600