Literature DB >> 30868836

European Framework of Rehabilitation Services Types: the perspective of the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Section and Board of the European Union of Medical Specialists.

Gerold Stucki1,2,3,4,5, Mauro Zampolini6,7, Melissa Selb8,4, Maria G Ceravolo9,10, Mark Delargy11,12, Enrique Varela Donoso13,14, Carlotte Kiekens15,16, Nicolas Christodoulou17,18.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effectiveness in health services is achieved if desired clinical outcomes are reached. In rehabilitation the relevant clinical outcome is functioning, with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as the reference system for the standardized reporting of functioning outcomes. To foster the implementation of the ICF in clinical quality management (CQM) across the rehabilitation services continuum, the UEMS-PRM Section and Board approved an ICF implementation action plan that includes the identification of types of currently provided rehabilitation services in Europe. The objective of this paper is to report on the development of a European framework of rehabilitation service types that can provide the foundation for the standardized reporting of functioning outcomes and CQM programs.
METHODS: A multistage consensus process involving delegates (participants) from the UEMS-PRM Section and Board as well as external experts across European regions comprised the development of an initial framework by an editorial group, two feedback rounds via e-mail and a deliberation by the UEMS-PRM Section and Board in its September 2018 meeting in Stockholm (Sweden). In the first feedback round, participants were asked whether: 1) the initial framework of service types exists in their respective country: 2) the description represents the service type: and 3) an existing service type was missing. Based on the first-round results, the framework proposal was modified by the editorial group. In the second feedback round, participants were asked to confirm or comment on each of the service types in the revised framework. Based on the second-round results, the framework proposal was again modified and presented for discussion, revision and approval at the Stockholm meeting.
RESULTS: In the first feedback round, eight rehabilitation services were added to the framework proposal and two service types that were deemed "missing" were not included. In the second round, all seven initially proposed and six of the added service types were reconfirmed, while two of the added service types were not supported. Based on deliberations at the Stockholm meeting, some modifications were made to the proposed framework, and the UEMS-PRM general assembly approved a European Framework of Rehabilitation Service Types that comprises of: Rehabilitation in acute care, General post-acute rehabilitation, Specialized post-acute rehabilitation, General outpatient rehabilitation, Specialized outpatient rehabilitation, General day rehabilitation, Specialized day rehabilitation, Vocational rehabilitation, Rehabilitation in the community, Rehabilitation services at home (incl. nursing home), Rehabilitation for specific groups of persons with disability, Rehabilitation in social assistance, Specialized lifelong follow-up rehabilitation, and Rehabilitation in medical health resorts.
CONCLUSIONS: The European Framework of Rehabilitation Services Types presented in this paper will be continuously updated according to new and emerging service types. Next steps of the UEMS-PRM effort to implement the ICF in rehabilitation include the specification of clinical assessment schedules for each service type and case studies illustrating service provision across the spectrum of rehabilitation service types. The European Framework will enable the accountable reporting of functioning outcomes at the national level and the continuous improvement of rehabilitation service provision in CQM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30868836     DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05728-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1973-9087            Impact factor:   2.874


  3 in total

1.  [Rehabilitation in the time of COVID-19].

Authors:  S Laxe; J C Miangolarra Page; J Chaler; L Gil Fraguas; A Gómez; F Luna; R Llavona; R Del Pino-Algarrada; N Salaverría Izaguirre; P Sanchez Tarifa; M E Santandreu; R Garreta
Journal:  Rehabilitacion (Madr)       Date:  2020-04-10

2.  The Nottwil Standard-Development and Implementation of an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Based Clinical Standard Assessment for Post-acute Rehabilitation After Newly Acquired Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Anke Scheel-Sailer; Patricia Lampart; Melissa Selb; Michael Baumberger; Hans Peter Gmünder; Diana Sigrist-Nix; Klaus Schmitt; Gerold Stucki
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-09-13

3.  Characterizing the Services of a Rehabilitation Centre Specialized in Spinal Cord Injury/Disorder using the International Classification of Service Organization in Rehabilitation 2.0 and Implications for Health Reporting: A Demonstration Project.

Authors:  Anke Scheel-Sailer; Melissa Selb; Michael Baumberger; Armin Gemperli; Inge Eriks-Hoogland; Luca Jelmoni; Stefan Metzger; Jürgen Pannek; Diana Sigrist-Nix; Gerold Stucki
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.959

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.