Literature DB >> 30868773

Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is Dedicated Hot Gall Bladder List Cost Effective?

Saad Ullah Khan1, Jun Yi Soh2, Nazli Muhibullah3, Aikaterini Peleki4, Muhammad Abdullah1, Peter William Waterland1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute presentation of gall stone disease is a common emergency. Resource limitation often results in unnecessary long waiting times and repeat hospital admissions. The aim of this study was to investigate if funding a dedicated hot gall bladder list is justified.
METHODS: Patients with acute gall stone related complications between 1st January 2016 and 31st December 2017 were studied. Outcome measures included the number of acute admissions, length of hospital stay (LOS), approximate cost per patient. The length of stay was identified as a critical outcome measure.
RESULTS: Fourteen hundred and ninety-five (11%) out of 14189 acute surgical admissions were related to gall stone complications. These included acute cholecystitis 576 (39%), biliary colic 485 (32%), pancreatitis 405 (27%) and jaundice 34 (2%). Twelve hundred and twenty-two patients accounted for 1461 admissions. 182 (15%) patients had recurrent admissions (35%) and on average stayed 11.2 days in the hospital compared to 5.8 days for that of single presentation. The cost of emergency LC (£2053) was less than half of elective LC following single emergency admission (£5661) and less than one third of Elective LC following recurrent admissions (£7453). A trust can save £1,891,784 per year by achieving 80% target. The savings can be used to fund a dedicated hot gall bladder list, releasing hospital beds and additional benefit of reducing the workforce days lost to sickness in general.
CONCLUSIONS: Emergency LC is cost effective and savings made for such a service is sufficient to fund a dedicated hot gall bladder list..

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost Savings; Costs and Cost Analysis; Cost-Benefitzzm321990Analysis; Hospital Costs; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Laparoscopic; Cholecystectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30868773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad        ISSN: 1025-9589


  3 in total

1.  Evaluating the advantages of treating acute cholecystitis by following the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18): a study emphasizing clinical outcomes and medical expenditures.

Authors:  Yu-Ning Lin; Yu-Tung Wu; Chih-Yuan Fu; Chien-Hung Liao; Chi-Tung Cheng; Shang-Yu Wang; Being-Chuan Lin; Yu-Pao Hsu; Shih-Ching Kang; Erh-Hao Liu; I-Ming Kuo; Chun-Hsiang Ou Yang; Shang-Ju Yang; Jen-Fu Huang; Chih-Po Hsu; Feng-Jen Hsieh; Chien-An Liao; Ling-Wei Kuo; Yu-San Tee; Chi-Hsun Hsieh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Optimising the outcomes of index admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration for biliary emergencies: a service model.

Authors:  Ahmad H M Nassar; Hwei J Ng; Zubir Ahmed; Arkadiusz Peter Wysocki; Colin Wood; Ayman Abdellatif
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  'Hot gall bladder service' by emergency general surgeons: Is this safe and feasible?

Authors:  Mohammad Imtiaz; Samip Prakash; Sara Iqbal; Roland Fernandes; Ankur Shah; Ashish K Shrestha; Sanjoy Basu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.