| Literature DB >> 30868739 |
Kate M Mitchell1, Brooke Hoots2, Dobromir Dimitrov3, Danielle German4, Colin Flynn5, Jason E Farley6, Marcy Gelman7, James P Hughes3,8, Deborah Donnell3, Adeola Adeyeye9, Robert H Remien10,11, Chris Beyrer12, Gabriela Paz-Bailey13, Marie-Claude Boily1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: HIV prevalence is high among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Baltimore, Maryland, United States, and the levels of viral suppression among HIV-positive MSM are relatively low. The HIV Prevention Trials Network 078 trial seeks to increase the levels of viral suppression among US MSM by increasing the rates of diagnosis and linkage to care and treatment. We estimated the increases in viral suppression needed to reach different HIV incidence reduction targets, and the impact of meeting diagnosis and treatment targets.Entities:
Keywords: HIV infections; United States; forecasting; homosexuality, male; incidence; models, theoretical
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30868739 PMCID: PMC6416473 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25246
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int AIDS Soc ISSN: 1758-2652 Impact factor: 5.396
Summary of key sexual behaviour, care continuum and intervention efficacy parameters and fitting outcomes
| Parameters | Range | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Sexual behaviour parameters | ||
| Average number of new main anal sex partners per year 2011 | ||
| 18‐ to 24‐year‐old black MSM | 0.58 to 0.8 | Baltimore NHBS |
| >24‐year‐old black MSM | 0.36 to 0.57 | |
| 18‐ to 24‐year‐old white MSM | 0.08 to 0.37 | |
| >24‐year‐old white MSM | 0.11 to 0.21 | |
| Average number of new casual anal sex partners per year 2011 | ||
| 18‐ to 24‐year‐old black MSM | 1.54 to 2.09 | Baltimore NHBS |
| >24‐year‐old black MSM | 0.81 to 1.24 | |
| 18‐ to 24‐year‐old white MSM | 0.05 to 0.93 | |
| >24‐year‐old white MSM | 0.28 to 1.07 | |
| Average number of new commercial anal sex partners per year 2011 | ||
| 18‐ to 24‐year‐old black MSM | 0 to 1.36 | Baltimore NHBS |
| >24‐year‐old black MSM | 0.15 to 0.85 | |
| 18‐ to 24‐year‐old white MSM | 0 to 0.28 | |
| >24‐year‐old white MSM | 0 to 0.07 | |
| Percentage of sex acts in which condom used 2011 | ||
| Main partnerships, both partners black | 47 to 67 | Baltimore NHBS |
| Main partnerships, either partner white | 30 to 39 | |
| Casual partnerships (any race partner) | 63 to 72 | |
| Commercial partnerships (any race partner) | 21 to 78 | |
| Care continuum parameters | ||
| Percentage of undiagnosed MSM testing for HIV per year, 2011 | ||
| 18‐ to 24‐year‐old black MSM | 63.8 to 95.0 | Baltimore NHBS |
| >24‐year‐old black MSM | 50.0 to 70.2 | |
| 18‐ to 24‐year‐old white MSM | 32.1 to 82.3 | |
| >24‐year‐old white MSM | 32.7 to 69.7 | |
| Percentage of white MSM testing positive for HIV who are immediately linked to care, 2008 | 67 to 85 | Maryland DH Baltimore data, national US MSM estimates (data on linkage within three months of diagnosis) |
| Ratio of percentage of black MSM linking to care immediately compared to white MSM | 0.84 to 1.5 | |
| Rate of linkage to care per year for those not linking immediately or dropped out, white MSM, 2008 | 0 to 0.5 | Fitted |
| Ratio of rate of linkage to care for black MSM compared to white MSM | 0.84 to 2 | National US MSM estimates |
| Rate of initiation onto ART from care per year, when meeting CD4 criteria, all years; permitted to differ by race | 0.5 to 4 | CD4 testing every 3 to 6 months (national guidelines), 80 to 90% acceptance |
| Percentage of white MSM initiating ART who are adherent (achieve viral suppression), all years | 73 to 99 | US studies (multiple sites) |
| Ratio of percentage adherent to ART black: white MSM | 0.82 to 1 | US studies (multiple sites) |
| Rate of dropout from ART per year first two years on ART, all years | 0.06 to 0.13 | US studies (multiple sites) |
| Ratio of dropout from ART third+ years on ART: first two years on ART | 0.5 to 1.0 | US ART cohorts (multiple sites) |
| Ratio of rate of dropout from care: rate of dropout from ART, black MSM | 1 to 7 | US studies (multiple sites) |
| Ratio of dropout from care for white: black MSM | 0.46 to 3 | US studies (multiple sites) |
| Intervention efficacies | ||
| Per‐sex‐act reduction in HIV acquisition risk due to correct condom use (%) | 58 to 79 | US MSM estimates (multiple sites) |
| Per‐sex‐act reduction in HIV acquisition risk due to male circumcision (%) | 12 to 23 | Assuming efficacy only for insertive anal sex |
| Per‐sex‐act reduction in HIV transmission risk due to being on ART and fully suppressed (%) | 99 to 100 | European MSM estimates (multiple countries) |
aTime‐varying parameters; final values reported here, earlier time‐trends described in Supporting Information and in Table S1; brange calculated by taking the upper and lower bounds from the 95% CI for the number of anal sex partners reported in the past 12 months, and adjusted for the proportion of partners who are reported to be “new.” Full details in Tables S1 and S2. For parameters, range is full range of plausible values explored; for fitting outcomes, range gives bounds within which model outcomes must fall to be retained. ND, no data; MSM, men who have sex with men; NHBS, National HIV Behavioural Surveillance; DH, Department of Health; US, United States; ART, antiretroviral therapy; CDC, Centers for Disease Control.
Figure 1Model fits to available data for men who have sex with men (MSM) in Baltimore
(a, b, c, d) HIV prevalence among young (18‐ to 24‐year‐old) black/older (>24‐year‐old) black/young white/older white MSM, (e) percentage of HIV‐positive MSM virally suppressed. Results are for all 169 fitting parameter combinations across eight groups of model fits (see section 2.3.1 “Addressing uncertainties across data sources” for more details). Results show median (thick lines), 25th to 75th percentile (dark shaded area), and 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles (dotted lines) across model fits. Points and error bars show the mean and 95% CI for HIV prevalence in National HIV Behavioural Surveillance data, measured with HIV testing (a,b,c,d). Data prior to 2014 (black points) were used for model fitting. Data from 2014 (white points) were used to validate model predictions.
Figure 2Required increase in viral suppression above initial 2015 level to meet different incidence reduction targets after different time periods (in comparison with the base‐case scenario at the same time point)
(a) 10, 20, 30 or 50% incidence reduction after 2, 5 or 10 years (x‐axis), pooled across all fits; (b) 50% incidence reduction target after five years, across all fits, or stratified by: the two demography fitting assumptions (fitting to either the National HIV Behavioural Surveillance (NHBS) or census age/race distribution), two diagnosis fitting assumptions (using NHBS HIV testing rate parameters or fitting to Centres for Disease Control estimates for Maryland), or the two care continuum fitting assumptions, fitting to NHBS antiretroviral therapy coverage data or Department of Health continuum data (x‐axis). Note in (b) results for each stratification are pooled across the other stratifications used. Box and whiskers are calculated from mean values across included fits. The thick horizontal line, box and whiskers show the median, 25th to 75th percentiles, and minimum/maximum values.[Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 3Care continuum indicators in the base‐case scenario (blue) and when incidence reduction targets (compared with the base‐case scenario at the same time point) of 10, 20 30 or 50% (green‐orange) are met after 2, 5 or 10 years, in analyses where all continuum parameters are varied simultaneously
These are the continuum indicators for the same results shown in Figure 2a. (a) Percentage of all HIV‐positive men who have sex with men (MSM) diagnosed, (b) percentage of diagnosed MSM in care, (c) percentage of diagnosed MSM on antiretroviral therapy (ART), (d) percentage of MSM on ART who are virally suppressed. Box and whiskers are calculated from mean values across all fits (i.e. combining the eight groups of model fits). The thick horizontal line, box and whiskers show the median, 25th to 75th percentiles, and minimum/maximum values respectively.
Figure 4HIV incidence reduction compared with the base‐case scenario in 2020 (a, c) and percentage virally suppressed in 2020 (b, d) when independently or simultaneously meeting the (a, b) US (c, d) UNAIDS continuum targets
Results show mean values calculated for each of up to 169 fits (pooled across the eight groups of model fits). The thick horizontal line, box and whiskers show the median, 25th to 75th percentiles, and minimum/maximum values.