Literature DB >> 30868559

Assessing optimism and pessimism about genomic medicine: Development of a genomic orientation scale.

Caroline Horrow1, Joel E Pacyna1, Erica J Sutton1, Beau P Sperry1, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf2, Richard R Sharp1,3.   

Abstract

Efforts to characterize stakeholder attitudes about the implementation of genomic medicine would benefit from a validated instrument for measuring public views of the potential benefits and harms of genomic technologies, which would facilitate comparison across populations and clinical settings. We sought to develop a scale to evaluate attitudes about the future of genomic medicine. We developed a 21-item scale that examined the likelihood of various outcomes of genomic medicine. The scale was administered to participants in a genomic sequencing study. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted and bivariate correlations were calculated. The genomic orientation (GO) scale was completed by 2895 participants. A two-factor structure was identified, corresponding to an optimism subscale (16 items, α = 0.89) and a pessimism subscale (5 items, α = 0.63). Genomic optimism was positively associated with a perceived value of genetic test results, higher health literacy, and decreased decisional conflict about participation in a genomic research study. Genomic pessimism was associated with concerns about genetic testing, lower health literacy, and increased decisional conflict about the decision to participate in the study. The GO scale is a promising tool for measuring both positive and negative views regarding the future of genomic medicine and deserves further validation.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attitudes; factor analysis; genetic testing; genomics; optimism; pessimism; statistical

Year:  2019        PMID: 30868559     DOI: 10.1111/cge.13535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  3 in total

1.  Negative association of perceived risk and willingness to participate in innovative psychiatric research protocols.

Authors:  Tenzin Tsungmey; Jane Paik Kim; Laura B Dunn; Katie Ryan; Kyle Lane-McKinley; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Adoption of New Risk Stratification Technologies Within US Hospital Referral Regions and Association With Prostate Cancer Management.

Authors:  Michael S Leapman; Rong Wang; Henry S Park; James B Yu; Preston C Sprenkle; Michaela A Dinan; Xiaomei Ma; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-10-01

3.  Citizens' Attitudes, Knowledge, and Educational Needs in the Field of Omics Sciences: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Giovanna Elisa Calabrò; Michele Sassano; Alessia Tognetto; Stefania Boccia
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.599

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.