Literature DB >> 30868358

Stakeholders' Views on Early Diagnosis for Alzheimer's Disease, Clinical Trial Participation and Amyloid PET Disclosure: A Focus Group Study.

Gwendolien Vanderschaeghe1, Rik Vandenberghe2,3,4, Kris Dierickx5.   

Abstract

Detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in an early stage is receiving increasing attention for a number of reasons, such as the failure of drug trials in more advanced disease stages, the demographic evolution, the financial impact of AD, and the approval of amyloid tracers for clinical use. Five focus group interviews with stakeholders (healthy elderly, informal caregivers, nursing staff, researchers, and clinicians) were conducted.. The verbatim transcripts were analysed via the Nvivo 11 software. Most stakeholder groups wanted to know their own amyloid PET scan result. However, differences occurred between FGs: two groups (informal caregivers and researchers) wanted to know, whilst in the three other groups (healthy elderly, nursing staff, and clinicians) FG members opted not to know or were still in doubt about their decision. Stakeholders provided insight into their reasons for wanting to know their amyloid PET scan result (e.g., the need for clarity, to inform relatives, to make arrangements), for not wanting to know their result, or why they were in doubt about their decision (e.g., fear of AD, not wanting to burden their social environment). Several advantages (e.g., to know what is going on with their health, to plan for the future) and disadvantages (e.g., absence of a disease modifying treatment, risks when undergoing tests) were mentioned as part of knowing their amyloid PET scan result. Certain considerations were clustered in a grey zone, in between advantage and disadvantage, such as the emotional consequences. Clinicians, researchers, and policymakers ought to be aware of the diversity of reasons for (not) wanting to know their result and how possible benefits and risks can be viewed differently. The current findings are of importance for future early diagnosis and disclosure of results in the research setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; Amyloid PET; Disclosure; Early diagnosis; Mild cognitive impairment; Qualitative study

Year:  2019        PMID: 30868358     DOI: 10.1007/s11673-019-09901-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioeth Inq        ISSN: 1176-7529            Impact factor:   1.352


  5 in total

1.  To Your Good Health! Going to the Pub With Friends, Nursing Dying Patients, And 'ER' Receptionists: the Ubiquitous Rise of Risk Management and Maybe A 'Prudential' Bioethics?

Authors:  Michael A Ashby; Bronwen Morrell
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Anticipated reactions to learning Alzheimer's disease biomarker results.

Authors:  Lindsay R Clark; Claire M Erickson; Erin M Jonaitis; Yue Ma; Nathaniel A Chin; Kristin Basche; Frederick B Ketchum; Carey E Gleason
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 8.823

3.  Disclosure of preclinical Alzheimer's disease biomarker results in research and clinical settings: Why, how, and what we still need to know.

Authors:  Claire M Erickson; Nathaniel A Chin; Sterling C Johnson; Carey E Gleason; Lindsay R Clark
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2021-02-20

4.  Considerations regarding a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease before dementia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jetske van der Schaar; Leonie N C Visser; Femke H Bouwman; Johannes C F Ket; Philip Scheltens; Annelien L Bredenoord; Wiesje M van der Flier
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 6.982

5.  Ethical Implications of Alzheimer's Disease Prediction in Asymptomatic Individuals through Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Frank Ursin; Cristian Timmermann; Florian Steger
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.