Literature DB >> 30868297

COPPS, a composite score integrating pathological features, PS100 and SDHB losses, predicts the risk of metastasis and progression-free survival in pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas.

Charlie Pierre1, Mikaël Agopiantz2,3, Laurent Brunaud4, Shyue-Fang Battaglia-Hsu3,5, Antoine Max1, Celso Pouget1, Claire Nomine4, Sandra Lomazzi6, Jean-Michel Vignaud1,3,6, Georges Weryha7, Abderrahim Oussalah3,5, Guillaume Gauchotte8,9,10, Hélène Busby-Venner1,3.   

Abstract

Current histoprognostic parameters and prognostic scores used in paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas do not adequately predict the risk of metastastic progression and survival. Here, using a series of 147 cases of paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma, we designed and evaluated the potential of a new score, the COPPS (COmposite Pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma Prognostic Score), by taking into consideration three clinico-pathological features (including tumor size, necrosis, and vascular invasion), and the losses of PS100 and SDHB immunostain to predict the risk of metastasis. We compared also the performance of the COPPS with several presently used histoprognostic parameters in risk assessment of these tumors. A PASS score (Pheochromocytoma of the Adrenal gland Scaled Score) ≥ 6 was significantly associated with the occurrence of metastases (P < 0.0001) and shorter PFS (P = 0.013). In addition, both MCM6 and Ki-67 LI correlated with worse PFS (P = 0.004 and P < 0.0001, respectively), and MCM6, but not Ki-67, was significantly higher in metastatic group (P = 0.0004). Loss of PS100 staining correlated with the occurrence of metastasis (P < 0.0001) and shorter PFS (P < 0.0001). At a value of greater or equal to 3, the COPPS correlated with shorter PFS (P < 0.0001), and predicted reproducibly (weighted Kappa coefficient, 0.863) the occurrence of metastases with a sensitivity of 100.0% and specificity of 94.7%. It thus surpassed those found for either PASS, SDHB, MCM6, or Ki-67 alone. In conclusion, while validation is still necessary in independent confirmatory cohorts, COPPS could be of great potential for the risk assessment of metastasis and progression in paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COPPS; Ki-67; MCM6; Metastasis; PASS; PS100; Paraganglioma; Pheochromocytoma; Prognosis; SDHB

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30868297     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-019-02553-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  10 in total

Review 1.  Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Paragangliomas and Pheochromocytomas.

Authors:  Ozgur Mete; Sylvia L Asa; Anthony J Gill; Noriko Kimura; Ronald R de Krijger; Arthur Tischler
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 3.943

2.  From SGAP-Model to SGAP-Score: A Simplified Predictive Tool for Post-Surgical Recurrence of Pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Mirko Parasiliti-Caprino; Fabio Bioletto; Chiara Lopez; Martina Bollati; Francesca Maletta; Marina Caputo; Valentina Gasco; Antonio La Grotta; Paolo Limone; Giorgio Borretta; Marco Volante; Mauro Papotti; Anna Pia; Massimo Terzolo; Mario Morino; Barbara Pasini; Franco Veglio; Ezio Ghigo; Emanuela Arvat; Mauro Maccario
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-03

Review 3.  Update from the 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumors: Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Head and Neck Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Authors:  Ozgur Mete; Bruce M Wenig
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2022-03-21

Review 4.  The systems of metastatic potential prediction in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Minghao Li; Hao Deng; Yingxian Pang; Longfei Liu; Xiao Guan
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 5.  Challenges in Paragangliomas and Pheochromocytomas: from Histology to Molecular Immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  C Christofer Juhlin
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.943

6.  Diagnosis for Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma: A Joint Position Statement of the Korean Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma Task Force.

Authors:  Eu Jeong Ku; Kyoung Jin Kim; Jung Hee Kim; Mi Kyung Kim; Chang Ho Ahn; Kyung Ae Lee; Seung Hun Lee; You-Bin Lee; Kyeong Hye Park; Yun Mi Choi; Namki Hong; A Ram Hong; Sang-Wook Kang; Byung Kwan Park; Moon-Woo Seong; Myungshin Kim; Kyeong Cheon Jung; Chan Kwon Jung; Young Seok Cho; Jin Chul Paeng; Jae Hyeon Kim; Ohk-Hyun Ryu; Yumie Rhee; Chong Hwa Kim; Eun Jig Lee
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab (Seoul)       Date:  2021-04-06

Review 7.  Clinical and Pathological Tools for Predicting Recurrence and/or Metastasis in Patients with Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma.

Authors:  Chiara Bima; Fabio Bioletto; Chiara Lopez; Martina Bollati; Stefano Arata; Matteo Procopio; Iacopo Gesmundo; Ezio Ghigo; Mauro Maccario; Mirko Parasiliti-Caprino
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-07-28

Review 8.  Recent Advances in Histopathological and Molecular Diagnosis in Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma: Challenges for Predicting Metastasis in Individual Patients.

Authors:  Yuto Yamazaki; Xin Gao; Alessio Pecori; Yasuhiro Nakamura; Yuta Tezuka; Kei Omata; Yoshikiyo Ono; Ryo Morimoto; Fumitoshi Satoh; Hironobu Sasano
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  Multidisciplinary practice guidelines for the diagnosis, genetic counseling and treatment of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas.

Authors:  R Garcia-Carbonero; F Matute Teresa; E Mercader-Cidoncha; M Mitjavila-Casanovas; M Robledo; I Tena; C Alvarez-Escola; M Arístegui; M R Bella-Cueto; C Ferrer-Albiach; F A Hanzu
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 10.  Progress in the diagnosis and treatment of paraganglioma.

Authors:  Ben Wang; Jian Qiu
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.