Robert Iansek1,2, Mary Danoudis1. 1. Clinical Research Centre for Movement Disorders and Gait The National Parkinson Foundation Center of Excellence Kingston Centre Monash Health Cheltenham Victoria Australia. 2. School of Clinical Sciences Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Freezing of gait (FOG) in Parkinson's disease (PD) is poorly understood; however, with the established understanding of basal ganglia function, its manifestations should be more easily interpretable. This review examines freezing of gait (FOG) from such a perspective. METHODS: A search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from the year 2000 onward for review articles, focused on the pathophysiology of FOG, was used to determine current concepts. A previously established model of basal ganglia function was used to determine the concepts' validities. At the core of the model are deficits in motor set maintenance and timing cue production for automatic movement. It includes the shift between attention and automation to the predominant attention control of gait in PD. RESULTS: The difficulties of the found concepts to explain FOG stem from failure to characterize different FOG components, from the assumption that all components share a similar pathophysiology, from a failure to separate basic deficits from compensatory mechanisms, and from the assumption that cognitive deficits are the cause of FOG rather than representing an inadequate compensation to FOG. Pragmatic approaches to management use the attention shift, with the provision of visual information about correct amplitude of step to correct initiation deficits, and motor blocks during gait. It also emphasizes the need to prevent step length reduction on turns, environmental situations, and cognitive overload. CONCLUSION: The concept of automatic deficits in set maintenance and cue production best describe FOG manifestations in PD and, with the use of attention, the concept also provides pragmatic strategies for management.
BACKGROUND: Freezing of gait (FOG) in Parkinson's disease (PD) is poorly understood; however, with the established understanding of basal ganglia function, its manifestations should be more easily interpretable. This review examines freezing of gait (FOG) from such a perspective. METHODS: A search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from the year 2000 onward for review articles, focused on the pathophysiology of FOG, was used to determine current concepts. A previously established model of basal ganglia function was used to determine the concepts' validities. At the core of the model are deficits in motor set maintenance and timing cue production for automatic movement. It includes the shift between attention and automation to the predominant attention control of gait in PD. RESULTS: The difficulties of the found concepts to explain FOG stem from failure to characterize different FOG components, from the assumption that all components share a similar pathophysiology, from a failure to separate basic deficits from compensatory mechanisms, and from the assumption that cognitive deficits are the cause of FOG rather than representing an inadequate compensation to FOG. Pragmatic approaches to management use the attention shift, with the provision of visual information about correct amplitude of step to correct initiation deficits, and motor blocks during gait. It also emphasizes the need to prevent step length reduction on turns, environmental situations, and cognitive overload. CONCLUSION: The concept of automatic deficits in set maintenance and cue production best describe FOG manifestations in PD and, with the use of attention, the concept also provides pragmatic strategies for management.
Entities:
Keywords:
Parkinson's disease; freezing of gait; gait control; pathophysiology; rehabilitation
Authors: Diego Santos-García; T de Deus Fonticoba; E Suárez Castro; A Aneiros Díaz; J M Paz González; M J Feal Panceiras; C García Sancho; S Jesús; P Mir; M Aguilar; P Pastor; J Hernández Vara; O de Fábregues-Boixar; V Puente; A Crespo Cuevas; I González-Aramburu; J Infante; F Carrillo Padilla; M Pueyo; S Escalante; N Bernardo; B Solano; A Cots Foraster; P Martinez-Martin Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: J Lucas McKay; Felicia C Goldstein; Barbara Sommerfeld; Douglas Bernhard; Sahyli Perez Parra; Stewart A Factor Journal: NPJ Parkinsons Dis Date: 2019-11-22
Authors: J Sebastian Marquez; S M Shafiul Hasan; Masudur R Siddiquee; Corneliu C Luca; Virendra R Mishra; Zoltan Mari; Ou Bai Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 4.003