| Literature DB >> 30867834 |
Christopher M Waldmann1,2, Andreea D Stuparu1,2, R Michael van Dam2,3, Roger Slavik1,2.
Abstract
The trend to inform personalized molecular radiotherapy with molecular imaging diagnostics, a concept referred to as theranostics, has transformed the field of nuclear medicine in recent years. The development of theranostic pairs comprising somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeting nuclear imaging probes and therapeutic agents for the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has been a driving force behind this development. With the Neuroendocrine Tumor Therapy (NETTER-1) phase 3 trial reporting encouraging results in the treatment of well-differentiated, metastatic midgut NETs, peptide radioligand therapy (RLT) with the 177Lu-labeled somatostatin analog (SSA) [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is now anticipated to become the standard of care. On the diagnostics side, the field is currently dominated by 68Ga-labeled SSAs for the molecular imaging of NETs with positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT). PET/CT imaging with SSAs such as [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC, and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC allows for NET staging with high accuracy and is used to qualify patients for RLT. Driven by the demand for PET/CT imaging of NETs, a commercial kit for the production of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE (NETSPOT) was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The synthesis of 68Ga-labeled SSAs from a 68Ge/68Ga-generator is straightforward and allows for a decentralized production, but there are economic and logistic difficulties associated with these approaches that warrant the search for a viable, generator-independent alternative. The clinical introduction of an 18F-labeled SSTR-imaging probe can help mitigate the shortcomings of the generator-based synthesis approach, but despite extensive research efforts, none of the proposed 18F-labeled SSAs has been translated past prospective first-in-humans studies so far. Here, we review the current state of probe-development from a translational viewpoint and make a case for a clinically viable, 18F-labeled alternative to the current standard [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE.Entities:
Keywords: 18F-Labeling; PET imaging; SSTR2; neuroendocrine tumors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30867834 PMCID: PMC6401503 DOI: 10.7150/thno.31806
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
18F-labeled SSAs discussed in this review.
| App. | Cpd. | Chemical Structure | IC50 [nM] | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [18F]FP-Gluc-TOCA | SSTR1 > 10,000 | |||
| Cel-S-Dpr([18F]FBOA)TOCA | SSTR1 > 1,000 | |||
| [18F]FET-βAG-TOCA | SSTR2 = 6.9 | |||
| [18F]FGlc-TATE | 4.2 | |||
| 18F-IMP466 | 3.6±0.6 | |||
| [18F]SiFA | 14.4±1.2 | |||
| [18F]AMBF3-TATE | (Ki values:) |
The 18F-moiety is attached to the N-termini of the SSA in all cases (see Figure 1). App. = Approach; Cpd = compound; IC50 = half-maximal inhibitory concentration; Ref. = reference. AR42J cells express high levels of the SSTR subtypes 1, 2, 3, and 5 46.
Summary of preclinical biodistribution data of the seven approaches compared to the current gold standard [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE.
| App. | Compound | Time Point | Tumor [%ID/g] | Bone [%ID/g] | Tumor/ Kidney | Tumor/ Liver | Tumor/ Muscle | Tumor/ Bone | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1h | 13.54 | 0.68 | 1.56 | 19 | 56 | 20 | |||
| 1h | 24.04 | 0.64 | 3.21 | 27 | 200 | 38 | |||
| 1h | 11.58 | - | - | - | 24.12 | - | |||
| 1h | 5.62 | 0.58 | 1.64 | 6.2 | 12 | 9.7 | |||
| 2h | 28.3 | 0.33 | 2.83 | - | - | 86 | |||
| 1h | 12.73 | - | - | - | 37.44 | - | |||
| 1h | 18.51 | 1.31 (1.5h) | 1.21 (65m) | 8.97 (65m) | 39.35 (65m) | - | |||
| 1h | 10.11 | 0.46 | 2.06 | 26 | 92 | 22 | |||
| 1h | 24.1 | - | 6.2 | 48 | 80 | - | |||
| 1h | 1.37 | - | - | - | 2.28 | - | |||
| 1h | 14.1 | - | - | - | - | - |