| Literature DB >> 30867350 |
Romeu Moreira Dos Santos1, Filipe Santos Fernando1, Maria de Fátima Silva Montassier1, Ketherson Rodrigues Silva1, Priscila Diniz Lopes1, Caren Pavani1, Mariana Monezi Borzi1, Cintia Hiromi Okino2, Helio José Montassier1.
Abstract
In this study, we evaluated antibody and cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses in the mucosal and systemic compartments and protection against challenge with a nephropathogenic Brazilian (BR-I) strain of infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) in chickens submitted to a vaccination regime comprising a priming dose of heterologous live attenuated Massachusetts vaccine followed by a booster dose of an experimental homologous inactivated vaccine two weeks later. This immunization protocol elicited significant increases in serum and lachrymal levels of anti-IBV IgG antibodies and upregulated the expression of CMI response genes, such as those encoding CD8β chain and Granzyme homolog A in tracheal and kidney tissues at 3, 7, and 11 days post-infection in the vaccinated chickens. Additionally, vaccinated and challenged chickens showed reduced viral loads and microscopic lesion counts in tracheal and kidney tissues, and their antibody and CMI responses were negatively correlated with viral loads in the trachea and kidney. In conclusion, the combination of live attenuated vaccine containing the Massachusetts strain with a booster dose of an inactivated vaccine, containing a BR-I IBV strain, confers effective protection against infection with nephropathogenic homologous IBV strain because of the induction of consistent memory immune responses mediated by IgG antibodies and TCD8 cells in the mucosal and systemic compartments of chickens submitted to this vaccination regime.Entities:
Keywords: avian coronavirus; cell-mediated immunity; humoral immunity; mucosal immunity; oil adjuvant
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30867350 PMCID: PMC6483904 DOI: 10.1292/jvms.18-0065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Med Sci ISSN: 0916-7250 Impact factor: 1.267
Primers for specific exon regions for quantification of CD8, Granzyme A and GAPDH beta-chain gene expression
| Gene | Primers (5′-3′) | Acession number | Location (nt) | Product size (bp) | Exon boundary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | Forward: AGCTGAATGGGAAGCTTACTGG | NM_204305.1 | 719–792 | 74 | 4/5 |
| Reverse: GCAGGTCAGGTCAACAACAGAG | |||||
| CD8β | Forward: CTGCATGGCTCCGACAATGG | NM_205247.2 | 710–802 | 93 | 2/3 |
| Reverse: ATCGACCACGTCAAGCTGGG | |||||
| Granzyme A | Forward: GCGTAGCAGGATGGGGACAA | NM_204457.1 | 429–627 | 199 | 4/5 |
| Reverse: CCACCTGAATCCCCTCGACA | |||||
Fig. 1.Kinetic profile of the anti-IBV IgG antibody responses in the lachrymal secretion (A) and serum (B) measured as median S/P values by the S-ELISA-Con A test in vaccinated (Vac. Group), non-vaccinated (Non-vac. Group) and non-vaccinated and non-challenged (Non-vac./Non-chal. Group) chickens at 3, 7, and 11 days post-infection (dpi) with BR-I virulent strain (IBVPR05). Median S/P values with different letters indicate significant difference (P≤0.05), as determined by Mann-Whitney U-test.
Fig. 2.Kinetic profile of the relative expression of CMI response genes in tracheal and kidney samples of vaccinated (Vac. Group), non-vaccinated (Non-vac. Group) and non-vaccinated and non-challenged (Nonvac./Non-chal. Group) chickens measured as median of fold change by RT-qPCR at 3, 7, and 11 dpi. CD8β gene expression in tracheal (A) and kidney (B) samples and Granzyme homolog A gene expression in tracheal (C) and kidney samples (D). Medians of fold change with different letters indicate significant difference (P≤0.05), as determined by Mann-Whitney U-test.
Fig. 3.Viral load measured as log10 number of copies of the S1 gene of IBV by RT-qPCR in tracheal (A) and kidney (B) tissues of vaccinated (Vac Group), non-vaccinated (Non-vac Group) and non-vaccinated and non-challenged (Non-vac./Non-chal. Group) chickens. Medians of number of copies of the S1 gene of IBV with different letters indicate significant difference (P≤0.05), as determined by Mann-Whitney U-test.
Microscopic pathological changes observed in the kidney and trachea of groups vaccinated and challenged with IBVPR-05 variant (Vac. Group) and non-vaccinated and challenged (Non-vac. Group) with IBVPR-05 variant
| Tissue | Trachea | No. Affected/No. Testedb) | Kidney | No. Affected/No. Testedb) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days post-infection | 3 dpi | 7 dpi | 11 dpi | 3 dpi | 7 dpi | 11 dpi | ||||||||
| Group | Microscopic lesions | Microscopic lesions | ||||||||||||
| Ep. Dec. | Infl. Inf. | Ep. Dec. | Infl. Inf. | Ep. Dec. | Infl. Inf. | Ep. Deg. | Infl. Inf. | Ep. Deg. | Infl. Inf. | Ep. Deg. | Infl. Inf. | |||
| Vac. | − | − | − | +(1/3) a) | − | 1/10 | − | − | − | − | − | − | 0/10 | |
| Non-vac. | − | − | +++(3/3) | ++(3/3) | − | +(1/3) | 7/10 | ++(1/3) | +(2/3) | − | +++(2/3) | − | +++(2/3) | 7/10 |
Score of microscopic lesions: (−), no lesions; (+), mild lesions; (++) moderate lesions; (+++), severe lesions. a) (Number of chickens with microscopic lesions / number of examined chickens per group and post infection interval). Ep. Dec.: Epitelial deciliation; Infl. Inf.: Inflammatory infiltration; Ep. Deg.: Epitelial degeneration. b) Number out of 10 challenged chickens showing any microscopic lesions in trachea and/or kidney. c) Number out of 10 showing any sign indicative of IB-induced kidney damage.