Literature DB >> 30867234

Relationship between nursing home quality indicators and potentially preventable hospitalisation.

Dongjuan Xu1, Robert Kane2, Greg Arling3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospitalisations are very common among nursing home residents and many of these are deemed inappropriate or preventable. Little is known about whether clinical care quality is related to hospitalisation, especially potentially preventable hospitalisations (PPHs). Among the few studies that have been conducted, the findings have been inconsistent. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between quality indicators and overall and PPHs among Medicaid beneficiaries aged 65 years and older receiving care at nursing homes in Minnesota.
METHODS: 23 risk-adjusted quality indicators were used to assess nursing home quality of care. Quality indicators and other facility-level variables from the Minnesota Nursing Home Report Card were merged with resident-level variables from the Minimum Data Set. These merged data were linked with Medicaid claims to obtain hospitalisation rates during the 2011-2012 period. The sample consisted of a cohort of 20 518 Medicaid beneficiaries aged 65 years and older who resided in 345 Minnesota nursing homes. The analyses controlled for resident and facility characteristics using the generalised linear mixed model.
RESULTS: The results showed that about 44 % of hospitalisations were PPHs. Available quality indicators were not strongly or consistently associated with the risk of hospitalisation (neither overall nor PPH). Among these 23 quality indicators, five quality indicators (antipsychotics without a diagnosis of psychosis, unexplained weight loss, pressures sores, bladder continence and activities of daily living [ADL] dependence) were related significantly to hospitalisation and only four quality indicators (antipsychotics without a diagnosis of psychosis, unexplained weight loss, ADL dependence and urinary tract infections) were related to PPH.
CONCLUSION: Although general quality indicators can be informative about overall nursing home performance, only selected quality indicators appear to tap dimensions of clinical quality directly related to hospitalisations. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  nursing home, potentially preventable hospitalisations, quality indicators

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30867234     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  5 in total

1.  Quality measurement and nursing homes: measuring what matters.

Authors:  Robert E Burke; Rachel M Werner
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 7.035

2.  Identifying patterns of potentially preventable hospitalisations in people living with dementia.

Authors:  Lidia Engel; Kerry Hwang; Anita Panayiotou; Jennifer J Watts; Cathrine Mihalopoulos; Jeromey Temple; Frances Batchelor
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.908

3.  Nobody ever questions-Polypharmacy in care homes: A mixed methods evaluation of a multidisciplinary medicines optimisation initiative.

Authors:  Sue Jordan; Hayley Prout; Neil Carter; John Dicomidis; Jamie Hayes; Jeffrey Round; Andrew Carson-Stevens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Measuring safety in older adult care homes: a scoping review of the international literature.

Authors:  Stacey Rand; Nick Smith; Karen Jones; Alan Dargan; Helen Hogan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Accuracy of Pressure Ulcer Events in US Nursing Home Ratings.

Authors:  Zihan Chen; Lauren J Gleason; Prachi Sanghavi
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.178

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.