Literature DB >> 30867191

Assessing wellness in the well-child check: What about social and emotional development?

Susan P Phillips1, Maggie Jiang2, Rukaiyah Lakkadghatwala2, Sheila Wang3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Canadian children aged 4 to 6 received well-child checks; to explore the nature of these checkups in a large family practice; and to examine the merit of using parent questionnaires about child resilience as a means of introducing a discussion about social and emotional development into this checkup.
DESIGN: Three-part mixed-methods study, using data derived from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN), chart reviews of a family practice, and semistructured interviews with parents.
SETTING: Primary care practices associated with CPCSSN, and a large primary care practice in Kingston, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who were born between 2008 and 2011, and a sample of parents whose children were between the ages of 6 and 9.
METHODS: International Classification of Diseases, version 9, codes from CPCSSN records were used to identify the prevalence of well-child checks in the 4-to-6 age group. Then 110 randomly selected charts from a large family practice were audited for inclusion of behavioural and social assessments of those aged 4 to 6. Finally, randomly selected parents from the same practice were invited to pilot-test the PERIK (Positive development and resilience in kindergarten) resilience questionnaire, interviewed about its merit, and asked to recall whether the identified areas of child development had been included in previous well-child checkups. MAIN
FINDINGS: Data from CPCSSN indicated that 11% of Canadian children aged 4 to 6 had had an explicit well-child check by their family physician. Among the reviewed charts from the one practice, social context was documented for 45% of them, but social and behavioural development was usually not recorded. The 42 parents interviewed found the PERIK questionnaire useful, but not perfect, for opening discussions about aspects of child development that they had not realized were central to the child's future health.
CONCLUSION: This study offers an initial approach to exploring resilience in children and therefore addressing recognized and alterable predictors of adult well-being. Early social and emotional development predicts resilience that, in turn, foreshadows future health. The PERIK questionnaire facilitated discussions that could add tremendous value to the well-child checks of children aged 4 to 6. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30867191      PMCID: PMC6515966     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  18 in total

1.  Use of well-child visits in high-deductible health plans.

Authors:  Alison A Galbraith; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Stephen B Soumerai; Allyson M Abrams; Kenneth Kleinman; Meredith B Rosenthal; J Frank Wharam; Alyce S Adams; Irina Miroshnik; Tracy A Lieu
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 2.  Group-based parent training programmes for improving emotional and behavioural adjustment in young children.

Authors:  Jane Barlow; Hanna Bergman; Hege Kornør; Yinghui Wei; Cathy Bennett
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-01

3.  Does well-child care have a future in pediatrics?

Authors:  Tumaini R Coker; Tainayah Thomas; Paul J Chung
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  Behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting programmes for early-onset conduct problems in children aged 3 to 12 years.

Authors:  Mairead Furlong; Sinead McGilloway; Tracey Bywater; Judy Hutchings; Susan M Smith; Michael Donnelly
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-02-15

Review 5.  Understanding and promoting resilience in children and youth.

Authors:  Julianna K Sapienza; Ann S Masten
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.741

6.  Adherence to AAP guidelines for well-child care under managed care. American Academy of Pediatrics.

Authors:  R S Byrd; R A Hoekelman; P Auinger
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 7.  How are we measuring resilience following childhood maltreatment? Is the research adequate and consistent? What is the impact on research, practice, and policy?

Authors:  Wendy A Walsh; Jean Dawson; Marybeth J Mattingly
Journal:  Trauma Violence Abuse       Date:  2010-01

Review 8.  Assessment of young children's social-emotional development and psychopathology: recent advances and recommendations for practice.

Authors:  Alice S Carter; Margaret J Briggs-Gowan; Naomi Ornstein Davis
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 8.982

Review 9.  A methodological review of resilience measurement scales.

Authors:  Gill Windle; Kate M Bennett; Jane Noyes
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 10.  A systematic review of the prevalence of parental concerns measured by the Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) indicating developmental risk.

Authors:  Susan Woolfenden; Valsamma Eapen; Katrina Williams; Andrew Hayen; Nicholas Spencer; Lynn Kemp
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 2.125

View more
  1 in total

1.  Correction.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.275

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.