| Literature DB >> 30867050 |
Camille Laporte1, Emily Tubbs2, Justine Cristante2,3, Anne-Sophie Gauchez4, Sandra Pesenti5, Frédéric Lamarche2, Cécile Cottet-Rousselle2, Catherine Garrel4, Anaick Moisan6, Jean-Marc Moulis2,7, Eric Fontaine2,3, Pierre-Yves Benhamou2,3, Sandrine Lablanche2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Islets of Langerhans transplantation is a promising therapy for type 1 <span class="Disease">diabetes mellitus, but this technique is compromised by transplantation stresses including inflammation. In other tissues, co-transplantation with mesenchymal stem cells has been shown to reduce damage by improving anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant defences. Therefore, we probed the protection afforded by bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to islets under pro-inflammatory cytokine stress.Entities:
Keywords: Co-culture; Cytokines; Diabetes mellitus type 1; Heme oxygenase 1; Islets of Langerhans transplantation; Mesenchymal stem cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30867050 PMCID: PMC6416979 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-019-1190-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther ISSN: 1757-6512 Impact factor: 6.832
Fig. 1Mesenchymal stem cells effect on rat islet viability and insulin secretion after exposure to cytokines. a Islet viability was assessed by flow cytometry after PKH67/Propidium iodide double staining. Data are representative of six independent experiments and are represented as median ± interquartile (ANOVA; *p < 0.05 vs. respective controls and #p < 0.05 vs. cytokine-exposed islets alone). b Stimulation index was determined based on the insulin secretion response to glucose stimulation. Data are representative of 10 independent experiments and are represented as median ± interquartile
Fig. 2Oxidative status evaluation of islets in different culture conditions. a Cytosolic and b mitochondrial ROS assessment were performed by flow cytometry using respectively Carbo-H2DCFDA and MitoSOX probes. Data are representative of five independent experiments and are represented as median ± interquartile (ANOVA; *p < 0.05 vs. respective controls)
Fig. 3MSCs’ effect on cytokine-exposed rat islet’s superoxide dismutases 1 and 2. a, c Transcripts were measured by RT-PCR and values were normalized on HPRT. b, d Quantitative analysis of proteins normalized with Ponceau S staining of the whole lane. e SOD activity was determined using the pyrogallol assay. Data are representative of six independent experiments for RT-PCR analysis and eight for western blot analysis and SOD activity. Data are represented as median ± interquartile (ANOVA; *p < 0.05 vs. respective controls and #p < 0.05 vs. cytokine-exposed islets alone)
Fig. 4MSCs’ effect on cytokine-exposed rat islet’s NAD(P)H dehydrogenase (quinone 1) expression. a Transcripts were measured by RT-PCR and values were normalized on HPRT. b Blot signals were normalized with Ponceau S staining of the whole. Data are representative of six independent experiments for RT-PCR analysis and eight for western blot analysis and are represented as median ± interquartile (ANOVA; *p < 0.05 vs. respective controls and #p < 0.05 vs. stressed islets alone)
Fig. 5MSCs stimulate heme oxygenase 1 and the downstream ferritin heavy-chain subunit in cytokinic stress conditions. a, c Transcripts were measured by RT-PCR and values were normalized on HPRT. b, d Blot signals were normalized with Ponceau S staining of the whole lane. Data are representative of six independent experiments for RT-PCR analysis and eight for western blot analysis and are represented as median ± interquartile (ANOVA; *p < 0.05 vs. respective controls and #p < 0.05 vs. stressed islets alone)