Literature DB >> 30866722

Measuring IRB Regulatory Compliance: Development, Testing, and Use of the National Cancer Institute StART Tool.

Lisa Rooney1, Laura Covington2, Andrea Dedier2, Birdena Samuel2.   

Abstract

Institutional review boards (IRBs) have been criticized for overstepping their authority by requiring research protocols to meet requirements that go beyond regulatory approval criteria. The youngest National Cancer Institute (NCI) central IRB (CIRB), the Cancer Prevention and Control (CPC) CIRB, was studied with the NCI Stipulation Analysis Review Tool (StART), which categorized 1,049 stipulations in 51 determination letters covering 30 approved protocols. NCI StART reduced the potential for subjective uncertainty in assessing the wide range of content in the stipulations. The tool determined the board functioned in accordance with federal mandates, with 80% of rendered stipulations aligning with IRB approval criteria. A complementary article provides background data and findings from the first 3 years' experience of the CPC CIRB.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IRB; clinical trials; compliance; regulatory; stipulations; tool

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30866722      PMCID: PMC6448580          DOI: 10.1177/1556264619831888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  15 in total

1.  IRB-identified ethical issues in nursing research.

Authors:  D P Olsen; D Mahrenholz
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  The stipulations of one institutional review board: a five year review.

Authors:  R A Sansone; S McDonald; P Hanley; M Sellbom; G A Gaither
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Mission creep in the IRB world.

Authors:  C K Gunsalus; Edward M Bruner; Nicholas C Burbules; Leon Dash; Matthew Finkin; Joseph P Goldberg; William T Greenough; Gregory A Miller; Michael G Pratt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined.

Authors:  E L Angell; A Bryman; R E Ashcroft; M Dixon-Woods
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2008-04

5.  How closely do institutional review boards follow the common rule?

Authors:  Charles W Lidz; Paul S Appelbaum; Robert Arnold; Philip Candilis; William Gardner; Suzanne Myers; Lorna Simon
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 6.  A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: what we know and what we still need to learn.

Authors:  Lura Abbott; Christine Grady
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 7.  Meeting the Challenge: The National Cancer Institute's Central Institutional Review Board for Multi-Site Research.

Authors:  Holly A Massett; Sharon L Hampp; Jacquelyn L Goldberg; Margaret Mooney; Linda K Parreco; Lori Minasian; Mike Montello; Grace E Mishkin; Catasha Davis; Jeffrey S Abrams
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Is your ethics committee efficient? Using "IRB Metrics" as a self-assessment tool for continuous improvement at the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand.

Authors:  Pornpimon Adams; Jaranit Kaewkungwal; Chanthima Limphattharacharoen; Sukanya Prakobtham; Krisana Pengsaa; Srisin Khusmith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Scoping Review of Empirical Research Relating to Quality and Effectiveness of Research Ethics Review.

Authors:  Stuart G Nicholls; Tavis P Hayes; Jamie C Brehaut; Michael McDonald; Charles Weijer; Raphael Saginur; Dean Fergusson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Shortcomings of protocols of drug trials in relation to sponsorship as identified by Research Ethics Committees: analysis of comments raised during ethical review.

Authors:  Marlies van Lent; Gerard A Rongen; Henk J Out
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.652

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Rare Opportunity: Examining the Experience of a New Institutional Review Board.

Authors:  Linda Parreco; Lisa Rooney; Sharon Hampp; Amanda Brown; Lori Minasian
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 1.742

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.