| Literature DB >> 30866408 |
Elwathig A M Hassan1,2,3,4, Tienah H H Elagib5, Hafeezullah Memon6,7, Muhuo Yu8,9,10, Shu Zhu11,12,13.
Abstract
Due to the non-polar nature and low wettability of carbon fibers (CFs), the interfacial adhesion between CFs and the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) matrix is poor, and this has negative effects on the mechanical properties of CF/PEEK composites. In this work, we established a modification method to improve the interface between CFs and PEEK based chemical grafting of aminated polyetheretherketone (PEEK-NH₂) on CFs to create an interfacial layer which has competency with the PEEK matrix. The changed chemical composition, surface morphology, surface energy, and interlaminar shear strength were investigated. After grafting, the interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) was improved by 33.4% due to the covalent bonds in the interface region, as well as having good compatibility between the interface modifier and PEEK. Finally, Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) observation also confirmed that the properties of the modified CF/PEEK composites interface were enhanced. This work is, therefore, a beneficial approach towards enhancing the mechanical properties of thermoplastic composites by controlling the interface between CFs and the PEEK matrix.Entities:
Keywords: aminated polyetheretherketone (PEEK-NH2); carbon fiber (CF); interfacial adhesion; polyetheretherketone (PEEK)
Year: 2019 PMID: 30866408 PMCID: PMC6427482 DOI: 10.3390/ma12050778
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Conditions of the nitration reaction of the products.
| Batch | T/(°C) | Reaction Time/(min) |
|---|---|---|
| PEEK-NH2-1 | 50 | 30 |
| PEEK-NH2-2 | 50 | 60 |
| PEEK-NH2-3 | 50 | 90 |
| PEEK-NH2-4 | 50 | 120 |
Figure 1Amination of polyetheretherketone (PEEK).
Figure 2Complete representation of the grafting procedures.
Figure 3SEM images of (A) PEEK-NH2-1@CF, (B) PEEK-NH2-2@CF, (C) PEEK-NH2-3@CF, and (D) PEEK-NH2-4@CF.
Surface energies of modified carbon fibers (CFs).
| Samples | Contact Angle (°) | γd (mJm−2) | γp (mJm−2) | γ (mJm−2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water | Glycerol | ||||
| Desized-CF | 79.9 | 92.4 | 1.03 | 44.64 | 45.67 |
| PEEK-NH2-1@CF | 77 | 81 | 1.50 | 64.92 | 66.42 |
| PEEK-NH2-2@CF | 74 | 78.2 | 1.62 | 70.48 | 72.10 |
| PEEK-NH2-3@CF | 71 | 75.2 | 1.92 | 77.52 | 79.44 |
| PEEK-NH2-4@CF | 68 | 73 | 1.67 | 79.71 | 81.38 |
Figure 4Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of different degrees of amination of PEEK.
Thermal properties of modified CFs grafted with PEEK-NH2.
| Sample | T5 (°C) | Char Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
| 700 | 68 |
|
| 674 | 59 |
|
| 670 | 57 |
|
| 647 | 54 |
|
| 568 | 46 |
T5: Temperature at 5% weight loss in air. Char yield (%): Residual weight at ~800 °C in air.
Figure 513C NMR of PEEK and PEEK-NO2.
Figure 6FTIR spectra (A) nitrided PEEK, (B) aminated PEEK, and (C) activated-CF (ACF) and PEEK-NH2 grafted CF.
Figure 7(A) Stress–strain curves in interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) tests, (B) ILSS at different degrees of amination of PEEK.
Figure 8(A) Storage modulus and (B) tan δ of PEEK-NH2 modified CF/PEEK composites.
Figure 9SEM images of fracture surface micrographs of CF-PEEK composites containing CF with different modifications: (A) Desized@CF, (B) PEEK-NH2-1@CF, (C) PEEK-NH2-2@CF, and (D) PEEK-NH2-3@CF.