Hana Jeon1, Leonard J Bernstein1,2, Daniel A Belkin1,3, Sabrina Ghalili1, Roy G Geronemus1,3. 1. Laser & Skin Surgery Center of New York, New York. 2. Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York. 3. Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York.
Abstract
Importance: Recent concerns regarding repetitive use of general anesthesia in children younger than 3 years have placed greater importance on the controversy surrounding the timing of the initiation of port-wine stain (PWS) laser treatment. Objective: To evaluate the use of PWS treatments at the age of 1 year or younger in the office setting without general anesthesia. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study based on medical record reviews at a single, high-volume laser center for children who started pulsed dye laser treatment at the age of 1 year or younger for their PWS between 2000 and 2017. The data cutoff was at 1 year after the initial treatment to have comparable data points. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was improvement of PWSs using before and after photographs, which were reviewed by 4 physicians independently and graded using the following 5-point visual analog scale (VAS): poor (grade 1: 0%-25% improvement), fair (grade 2: 26%-50% improvement), good (grade 3: 51%-75% improvement), excellent (grade 4: 76%-99% improvement), and complete (grade 5: 100% improvement) clearance. Results: Of the 197 patients (73 [37.1%] boys; 124 [62.9%] girls), most (149 [75.6%]) had facial lesions. The mean age at the time of first treatment was 3.38 months (range, 5-355 days) and the mean number of treatments was 9.8 (range, 2-23; median, 10). Per the mean physician VAS grading of 197 patients, 51 patients (25.9%) showed 100% clearance (mean [range] VAS score of 4.78 [4.5 - 5]); 81 patients (41.1%) showed 76 to 99% improvement (mean [range] VAS score of 3.91 [3.5 to <4.5]); 44 patients (22.3%) showed 51% to 75% improvement (mean [range] VAS score of 2.86 [2.5 to <3.5]); 13 patients (6.6%) showed 26% to 50% improvement (mean [range] VAS score of 2.12 [1.5 to <2.5]); and 8 patients (4.1%) showed 0 to 25% improvement (mean [range] VAS score of 0.78 [0 to <1.5]). The presence of a V1 (first branch of the trigeminal nerve [ophthalmic nerve]) lesion was associated with a statistically significantly higher clearance rate by a VAS grade of 0.55 (95% CI, 0.25-0.84; P < .001). The mean (SD) VAS grade for all patients was 3.65 (1.26), corresponding to excellent clearance. None of the patients experienced scarring or permanent pigmentary change. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, treatment of PWSs in infancy was both safe and effective. Early intervention allows for treatment without general anesthesia, maximizing the chance to achieve clearance before school age and thereby minimizing the negative outcome of PWSs for both the patient and the family.
Importance: Recent concerns regarding repetitive use of general anesthesia in children younger than 3 years have placed greater importance on the controversy surrounding the timing of the initiation of port-wine stain (PWS) laser treatment. Objective: To evaluate the use of PWS treatments at the age of 1 year or younger in the office setting without general anesthesia. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study based on medical record reviews at a single, high-volume laser center for children who started pulsed dye laser treatment at the age of 1 year or younger for their PWS between 2000 and 2017. The data cutoff was at 1 year after the initial treatment to have comparable data points. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was improvement of PWSs using before and after photographs, which were reviewed by 4 physicians independently and graded using the following 5-point visual analog scale (VAS): poor (grade 1: 0%-25% improvement), fair (grade 2: 26%-50% improvement), good (grade 3: 51%-75% improvement), excellent (grade 4: 76%-99% improvement), and complete (grade 5: 100% improvement) clearance. Results: Of the 197 patients (73 [37.1%] boys; 124 [62.9%] girls), most (149 [75.6%]) had facial lesions. The mean age at the time of first treatment was 3.38 months (range, 5-355 days) and the mean number of treatments was 9.8 (range, 2-23; median, 10). Per the mean physician VAS grading of 197 patients, 51 patients (25.9%) showed 100% clearance (mean [range] VAS score of 4.78 [4.5 - 5]); 81 patients (41.1%) showed 76 to 99% improvement (mean [range] VAS score of 3.91 [3.5 to <4.5]); 44 patients (22.3%) showed 51% to 75% improvement (mean [range] VAS score of 2.86 [2.5 to <3.5]); 13 patients (6.6%) showed 26% to 50% improvement (mean [range] VAS score of 2.12 [1.5 to <2.5]); and 8 patients (4.1%) showed 0 to 25% improvement (mean [range] VAS score of 0.78 [0 to <1.5]). The presence of a V1 (first branch of the trigeminal nerve [ophthalmic nerve]) lesion was associated with a statistically significantly higher clearance rate by a VAS grade of 0.55 (95% CI, 0.25-0.84; P < .001). The mean (SD) VAS grade for all patients was 3.65 (1.26), corresponding to excellent clearance. None of the patients experienced scarring or permanent pigmentary change. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, treatment of PWSs in infancy was both safe and effective. Early intervention allows for treatment without general anesthesia, maximizing the chance to achieve clearance before school age and thereby minimizing the negative outcome of PWSs for both the patient and the family.
Authors: Anne Margreet van Drooge; Johan F Beek; J P Wietze van der Veen; Chantal M A M van der Horst; Albert Wolkerstorfer Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Igor Snast; Moshe Lapidoth; Ran Kaftory; Adi Nosrati; Emmilia Hodak; Daniel Mimouni; Efrat Solomon-Cohen; Assi Levi Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2021-02-13 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Sara Sabeti; Karen L Ball; Craig Burkhart; Lawrence Eichenfield; Esteban Fernandez Faith; Ilona J Frieden; Roy Geronemus; Deepti Gupta; Andrew C Krakowski; Moise L Levy; Denise Metry; J Stuart Nelson; Megha M Tollefson; Kristen M Kelly Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Gonca Cinkara; Ginger Beau Langbroek; Chantal M A M van der Horst; Albert Wolkerstorfer; Sophie E R Horbach; Dirk T Ubbink Journal: Am J Clin Dermatol Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 7.403