Daniel E Falk1, Stephanie S O'Malley2, Katie Witkiewitz3, Raymond F Anton4, Raye Z Litten1, Megan Slater5, Henry R Kranzler6, Karl F Mann7, Deborah S Hasin8,9, Bankole Johnson10, Didier Meulien11, Megan Ryan1, Joanne Fertig1. 1. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 3. Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. 5. CSR, Incorporated. 6. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 7. Department of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany. 8. Department of Psychiatry, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York. 9. Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, New York. 10. Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore. 11. CRD Neurology, Lundbeck SAS, Valby, Denmark.
Abstract
Importance: The US Food and Drug Administration recognizes total abstinence and no heavy drinking days as outcomes for pivotal pharmacotherapy trials for alcohol use disorder (AUD). Many patients have difficulty achieving these outcomes, which can discourage seeking treatment and has slowed the development of medications that affect alcohol use. Objective: To compare 2 drinking-reduction outcomes with total abstinence and no heavy drinking outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data were obtained from 3 multisite, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials of medications for treating alcohol dependence (naltrexone, varenicline, and topiramate) in adults with DSM-IV-categorized alcohol dependence. Main Outcomes and Measures: Within each trial, the percentage of participants in active and placebo conditions who met responder definitions of abstinence, no heavy drinking days, a WHO 1-level reduction, and a WHO 2-level reduction was computed by month with corresponding effect sizes (Cohen h). Results: Across the 3 trials (N = 1169; mean [SD] age, 45 [10] years; 824 [70.5%] men), the percentage of participants classified as responders during the last 4 weeks of treatment was lowest for abstinence (naltrexone, 34.7% [100 of 288]; varenicline, 7.3% [7 of 96]; topiramate, 11.7% [21 of 179]) followed by no heavy drinking days (naltrexone, 51.0% [147 of 288]; varenicline, 24.0% [23 of 96]; topiramate, 20.7% [37 of 179]), WHO 2-level reduction (naltrexone, 75.0% [216 of 288]; varenicline, 55.2% [53 of 96]; topiramate, 44.7% [80 of 179]), and WHO 1-level reduction (naltrexone, 83.3% [240 of 288]; varenicline, 69.8 [67 of 96]; topiramate, 54.7% [98 of 179]) outcomes. Standardized treatment effects observed for the WHO 2-level reduction outcomes (naltrexone, Cohen h = 0.214 [95% CI, 0.053 -0.375]; varenicline, 0.273 [95% CI, -0.006 to 0.553]; topiramate, 0.230 [95% CI, 0.024-0.435]) and WHO 1-level reduction (naltrexone, Cohen h = 0.116 [95% CI, -0.046 to 0.277]; varenicline, 0.338 [95% CI, 0.058-0.617]; topiramate, 0.014 [95% CI, -0.192 to 0.219]) were comparable with those obtained using abstinence (naltrexone, Cohen h = 0.142 [95% CI, -0.020 to 0.303]; varenicline, 0.146 [95% CI, -0.133 to 0.426]; topiramate, 0.369 [95% CI, 0.163-0.574]) and no heavy drinking days (naltrexone, Cohen h = 0.140 [95% CI, -0.021 to 0.302]; varenicline, 0.232 [95% CI, -0.048 to 0.511]; topiramate, 0.207 [95% CI, 0.002-0.413]). Conclusions and Relevance: WHO drinking risk level reductions appear to be worthwhile indicators of treatment outcome in AUD pharmacotherapy trials. These outcomes may align with drinking reduction goals of many patients and capture clinically meaningful improvements experienced by more patients than either abstinence or no heavy drinking days. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00006206; NCT01146613; NCT00210925.
Importance: The US Food and Drug Administration recognizes total abstinence and no heavy drinking days as outcomes for pivotal pharmacotherapy trials for alcohol use disorder (AUD). Many patients have difficulty achieving these outcomes, which can discourage seeking treatment and has slowed the development of medications that affect alcohol use. Objective: To compare 2 drinking-reduction outcomes with total abstinence and no heavy drinking outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data were obtained from 3 multisite, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials of medications for treating alcohol dependence (naltrexone, varenicline, and topiramate) in adults with DSM-IV-categorized alcohol dependence. Main Outcomes and Measures: Within each trial, the percentage of participants in active and placebo conditions who met responder definitions of abstinence, no heavy drinking days, a WHO 1-level reduction, and a WHO 2-level reduction was computed by month with corresponding effect sizes (Cohen h). Results: Across the 3 trials (N = 1169; mean [SD] age, 45 [10] years; 824 [70.5%] men), the percentage of participants classified as responders during the last 4 weeks of treatment was lowest for abstinence (naltrexone, 34.7% [100 of 288]; varenicline, 7.3% [7 of 96]; topiramate, 11.7% [21 of 179]) followed by no heavy drinking days (naltrexone, 51.0% [147 of 288]; varenicline, 24.0% [23 of 96]; topiramate, 20.7% [37 of 179]), WHO 2-level reduction (naltrexone, 75.0% [216 of 288]; varenicline, 55.2% [53 of 96]; topiramate, 44.7% [80 of 179]), and WHO 1-level reduction (naltrexone, 83.3% [240 of 288]; varenicline, 69.8 [67 of 96]; topiramate, 54.7% [98 of 179]) outcomes. Standardized treatment effects observed for the WHO 2-level reduction outcomes (naltrexone, Cohen h = 0.214 [95% CI, 0.053 -0.375]; varenicline, 0.273 [95% CI, -0.006 to 0.553]; topiramate, 0.230 [95% CI, 0.024-0.435]) and WHO 1-level reduction (naltrexone, Cohen h = 0.116 [95% CI, -0.046 to 0.277]; varenicline, 0.338 [95% CI, 0.058-0.617]; topiramate, 0.014 [95% CI, -0.192 to 0.219]) were comparable with those obtained using abstinence (naltrexone, Cohen h = 0.142 [95% CI, -0.020 to 0.303]; varenicline, 0.146 [95% CI, -0.133 to 0.426]; topiramate, 0.369 [95% CI, 0.163-0.574]) and no heavy drinking days (naltrexone, Cohen h = 0.140 [95% CI, -0.021 to 0.302]; varenicline, 0.232 [95% CI, -0.048 to 0.511]; topiramate, 0.207 [95% CI, 0.002-0.413]). Conclusions and Relevance: WHO drinking risk level reductions appear to be worthwhile indicators of treatment outcome in AUD pharmacotherapy trials. These outcomes may align with drinking reduction goals of many patients and capture clinically meaningful improvements experienced by more patients than either abstinence or no heavy drinking days. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00006206; NCT01146613; NCT00210925.
Authors: Raymond F Anton; Stephanie S O'Malley; Domenic A Ciraulo; Ron A Cisler; David Couper; Dennis M Donovan; David R Gastfriend; James D Hosking; Bankole A Johnson; Joseph S LoCastro; Richard Longabaugh; Barbara J Mason; Margaret E Mattson; William R Miller; Helen M Pettinati; Carrie L Randall; Robert Swift; Roger D Weiss; Lauren D Williams; Allen Zweben Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-05-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Deborah S Hasin; Melanie Wall; Katie Witkiewitz; Henry R Kranzler; Daniel Falk; Raye Litten; Karl Mann; Stephanie S O'Malley; Jennifer Scodes; Rebecca L Robinson; Raymond Anton Journal: Lancet Psychiatry Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 27.083
Authors: Kevin A Hallgren; Katie Witkiewitz; Henry R Kranzler; Daniel E Falk; Raye Z Litten; Stephanie S O'Malley; Raymond F Anton Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Katie Witkiewitz; Kevin A Hallgren; Henry R Kranzler; Karl F Mann; Deborah S Hasin; Daniel E Falk; Raye Z Litten; Stephanie S O'Malley; Raymond F Anton Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2016-12-26 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Justin Knox; Melanie Wall; Katie Witkiewitz; Henry R Kranzler; Daniel E Falk; Raye Litten; Karl Mann; Stephanie S O'Malley; Jennifer Scodes; Raymond Anton; Deborah S Hasin Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jacob A Levine; Becky K Gius; George Boghdadi; Gerard J Connors; Stephen A Maisto; Robert C Schlauch Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Katie Witkiewitz; Nick Heather; Daniel E Falk; Raye Z Litten; Deborah S Hasin; Henry R Kranzler; Karl F Mann; Stephanie S O'Malley; Raymond F Anton Journal: Addiction Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Justin Knox; Jennifer Scodes; Katie Witkiewitz; Henry R Kranzler; Karl Mann; Stephanie S O'Malley; Melanie Wall; Raymond Anton; Deborah S Hasin Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Morris D Bell; Bharath Muppala; Andrea J Weinstein; David Ciosek; Brian Pittman; Ismene Petrakis; Joanna M Fiszdon Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2020-02-01
Authors: Sudie E Back; Kevin Gray; Elizabeth Santa Ana; Jennifer L Jones; Amber M Jarnecke; Jane E Joseph; James Prisciandaro; Therese Killeen; Delisa G Brown; Linda Taimina; Ebele Compean; Robert Malcolm; Julianne C Flanagan; Peter W Kalivas Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 2.226