Njeri K Thande1, Melinda Wang2, Kaveri Curlin3, Nisha Dalvie2, Carolyn M Mazure4. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 2. Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 3. Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Women's Health Research at Yale, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Abstract
Background: Sex is a biological variable linked to our chromosomal complement, while gender refers to one's personal identification as influenced by social, cultural, and personal experience. Both sex and gender and their interactions influence health outcomes. Although this is increasingly clear, we have not yet ensured that the next generation of physicians and physician-scientists is being taught the empirical findings necessary to understand these relationships. We assert that medical schools must incorporate these data into didactics throughout an integrated curriculum. Materials and Methods: This study evaluates a medical curriculum for sex- and gender-based content and provides recommendations for establishing and integrating pertinent sex and gender medicine didactics. Trained first-and second-year medical students audited 548 lectures and workshops to determine sex- and gender-based content. Results: Less than 25% of all sessions raised the topic of sex or gender influences on physiology and pathophysiology or the experience of the patient in the health care environment. Only 8.1% of all sessions included an in-depth discussion of sex or gender differences, and these discussions predominantly focused on basic physiology and prevalence and/or incidence of disease, and not on available data on sex- and gender-specific influences on diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and drug effects. The didactics that included data on sex or gender influences were largely in lectures rather than small group sessions, which are important for the development of critical clinical reasoning skills. Conclusions: A survey-based audit of medical school curricula can inform recommendations for improving the inclusion of data on sex- and gender-based content.
Background: Sex is a biological variable linked to our chromosomal complement, while gender refers to one's personal identification as influenced by social, cultural, and personal experience. Both sex and gender and their interactions influence health outcomes. Although this is increasingly clear, we have not yet ensured that the next generation of physicians and physician-scientists is being taught the empirical findings necessary to understand these relationships. We assert that medical schools must incorporate these data into didactics throughout an integrated curriculum. Materials and Methods: This study evaluates a medical curriculum for sex- and gender-based content and provides recommendations for establishing and integrating pertinent sex and gender medicine didactics. Trained first-and second-year medical students audited 548 lectures and workshops to determine sex- and gender-based content. Results: Less than 25% of all sessions raised the topic of sex or gender influences on physiology and pathophysiology or the experience of the patient in the health care environment. Only 8.1% of all sessions included an in-depth discussion of sex or gender differences, and these discussions predominantly focused on basic physiology and prevalence and/or incidence of disease, and not on available data on sex- and gender-specific influences on diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and drug effects. The didactics that included data on sex or gender influences were largely in lectures rather than small group sessions, which are important for the development of critical clinical reasoning skills. Conclusions: A survey-based audit of medical school curricula can inform recommendations for improving the inclusion of data on sex- and gender-based content.