| Literature DB >> 30864760 |
K E Mues1, M Klein2, D G Kleinbaum2, W D Flanders2, L M Fox3.
Abstract
Episodes of adenolymphangitis (ADL) are a recurrent clinical aspect of lymphatic filariasis (LF) and a risk factor for progression of lymphedema. Inter-digital entry lesions, often found on the web spaces between the toes of those suffering from lymphedema, have been shown to contribute to the occurrence of ADL episodes. Use of antifungal cream on lesions is often promoted as a critical component of lymphedema management. Our objective was to estimate the observed effect of antifungal cream use on ADL episodes according to treatment regimen among a cohort of lymphedema patients enrolled in a morbidity management program. We estimated this effect using marginal structural models for time varying confounding. In this longitudinal study, we estimate that for every one-unit increase in the number of times one was compliant to cream use through 12 months, there was a 23% (RR = 0.77 (0.62, 0.96)) decrease in the number of ADL episodes at 18 months, however the RR's were not statistically significant at other study time points. Traditionally adjusted models produced a non-significant RR closer to the null at all time points. This is the first study to estimate the effect of a regimen of antifungal cream on the frequency of ADL episodes. This study also highlights the importance of the consideration and proper handling of time-varying confounders in longitudinal observational studies. © Atlantis Press International B.V.Entities:
Keywords: Lymphatic filariasis; adenolymphangitis; lymphedema management; marginal structural models; time-varying confounding
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30864760 PMCID: PMC7377573 DOI: 10.2991/j.jegh.2017.10.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Epidemiol Glob Health ISSN: 2210-6006
Figure 1Causal diagram of the effect of a regimen of antifungal cream use (A) through k = 2 months on the outcome, ADL episodes, at K = 3 months. L represents the time-varying confounder, presence of inter-digital entry lesions.
Figure A.1Causal diagram of the effect of antifungal cream use through 18 months on ADL episodes between 23 and 24 months illustrating the relationships between time-varying confounders L, cream treatment A, and the outcome of interest Y, ADL between 23 and 24 months.
Figure A.2Causal diagram of the effect of antifungal cream use through 2 months on ADL episodes between 2 and 3 months illustrating the relationships between time-varying confounders L, cream treatment A, censoring C, and the outcome of interest Y, ADL between 2 and 3 months.
Frequency of clinical characteristics and history of MDA among uncensored lymphedema patients enrolled in a lymphedema management program. Khurda District, Odisha State, India, 2009–2011.
| # Uncensored individuals | 351 (94.9) | 334 (90.3) | 312 (84.3) | 280 (87.6) | 261 (70.5) | 247 (66.8) | 235 (63.5) |
| Advanced lymphedema stage | 44 (12.5) | 39 (11.7) | 38 (12.2) | 36 (12.9) | 35 (13.4) | 32 (13.0) | 33 (14.0) |
| Mean number of adl episodes per month (max) | 0.27 (4) | 0.28 (4) | 0.24 (3) | 0.14 (5) | 0.26 (8) | 0.30 (7) | 0.24 (8) |
| Presence of inter-digital entry lesions | 112 (31.9) | 107 (32.0) | 84 (26.9) | 66 (23.6) | 77 (29.5) | 62 (25.1) | 62 (26.4) |
| Ever participated in mda | 294 (83.8) | 283 (84.7) | 266 (85.3) | 239 (85.4) | 223 (85.4) | 209 (84.6) | 210 (89.4) |
Distribution of antifungal cream use regimens as cumulative sum of compliance to cream use over time among uncensored lymphedema patients. Khurda District, Odisha State, India. 2009–2011.
| 18 months | 235 | 21 (8.94) | 23 (9.79) | 19 (8.09) | 30 (12.77) | 33 (14.04) | 43 (18.30) | 66 (28.09) |
| 12 months | 247 | 26 (10.53) | 25 (10.12) | 34 (13.77) | 30 (12.15) | 53 (21.46) | 79 (31.98) | |
| 6 months | 261 | 29 (11.11) | 41 (15.71) | 35 (13.41) | 61 (23.37) | 95 (36.40) | ||
| 3 months | 280 | 37 (13.21) | 52 (18.57) | 65 (23.21) | 126 (45.00) | |||
| 2 months | 312 | 45 (14.42) | 72 (23.08) | 195 (62.50) | ||||
N represents the number of uncensored patients at follow-up time K, the subsequent time point to the corresponding time point in the table. For example, N = 235 represents the number of uncensored patients through K = 24 months, from which we sum the number of times each subject used antifungal cream through 18 months;
The values displayed in the table represent the number (N) and percent of patients who were compliant to the cream use regimen at the specified time point.
Model results of the association between a regimen of antifungal cream and the rate of ADL episodes at follow-up time point K among a cohort of lymphedema patients enrolled in a lymphedema management program, Khurda District, Odisha State, India, 2009–2011.
| 3 months | 1.08 (0.70, 1.67) | 0.94 (0.64, 1.37) | 1.12 (0.77, 1.64) | 1.76 (1.30, 2.38) |
| 6 months | 1.04 (0.60, 1.81) | 0.83 (0.45, 1.51) | 0.92 (0.47, 1.82) | 1.23 (0.89, 1.71) |
| 12 months | 0.63 (0.36, 1.09) | 0.81 (0.40, 1.60) | 0.84 (0.54, 1.30) | 1.27 (0.97, 1.67) |
| 18 months | 0.77 (0.62, 0.96) | 0.55 (0.39, 0.76) | 0.86 (0.59, 1.26) | 1.07 (0.90, 1.26) |
| 24 months | 0.80 (0.63, 1.03) | 0.74 (0.54, 1.01) | 0.83 (0.62, 1.11) | 1.08 (0.88, 1.32) |
Poisson model using stabilized inverse probability of treatment and inverse probability of censoring weights;
Additionally adjusted for lymphedema status (advanced, stages 4–7 vs. early, stages 1–3) and history of MDA;
Poisson model using non-stabilized inverse probability of treatment and inverse probability of censoring weights;
Adjusted for presence of inter-digital entry lesions, lymphedema status (advanced, stages 4–7 vs. early, stages 1–3) and history of MDA.
Parameter estimates from models estimating the association between a regimen of antifungal cream and the rate of ADL episodes at follow-up time point K among a cohort of lymphedema patients enrolled in a lymphedema management program, Khurda District, Odisha State, India, 2009–2011.
| 3 months | 0.08 (−0.36, 0.51) | −0.07 (−0.45, 0.32) | 0.12 (−0.27, 0.50) | 0.56 (0.26, 0.87) |
| 6 months | 0.03 (−0.52, 0.59) | −0.20 (−0.79, 0.40) | −0.08 (−0.76, 0.60) | 0.21 (−0.12, 0.54) |
| 12 months | −0.47 (−1.02, 0.09) | −0.22 (−0.91, 0.47) | −0.18 (−0.62, 0.26) | 0.24 (−0.03, 0.51) |
| 18 months | −0.26 (−0.48, −0.05) | −0.60 (0.39, 0.76) | −0.15 (−0.53, 0.23) | 0.07 (−0.10, 0.23) |
| 24 months | −0.22 (−0.47, 0.03) | −0.31 (−0.62, 0.06) | −0.18 (−0.47, 0.10) | 0.07 (−0.13, 0.28) |
Poisson model using stabilized inverse probability of treatment and inverse probability of censoring weights;
Additionally adjusted for lymphedema status (advanced, stages 4–7 vs. early, stages 1–3) and history of MDA;
Poisson model using non-stabilized inverse probability of treatment and inverse probability of censoring weights;
Poisson model adjusted for presence of inter-digital entry lesions, lymphedema status (advanced, stages 4–7 vs. early, stages 1–3) and history of MDA.