Literature DB >> 30864246

The optimal number of lymph nodes to evaluate among patients undergoing surgery for gallbladder cancer: Correlating the number of nodes removed with survival in 6531 patients.

Diamantis I Tsilimigras1, J Madison Hyer1, Anghela Z Paredes1, Dimitrios Moris2, Eliza W Beal1, Katiuscha Merath1, Rittal Mehta1, Aslam Ejaz1, Jordan M Cloyd1, Timothy M Pawlik1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to identify the minimum number and the optimal range of lymph nodes (LNs) to be examined among patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC).
METHODS: Between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2015, patients with a diagnosis of GBC were identified in the National Cancer Database. A machine-based learning approach was used to identify the minimum number and range of LNs to evaluate relative to long-term outcomes.
RESULTS: Among 6531 patients with GBC, median number of LNs evaluated was 2 (IQR:1-5); only 21.1% (n = 1376) of patients had 6 or more LNs evaluated. The median number of metastatic LNs was 0 (IQR: 0-1). On multivariable analysis, evaluation of < 4 LNs was associated with a higher hazard of death (referent 4-7 LNs: < 4 LNs, HR = 1.27, 95% CI, 1.16-1.40; P < 0.001), whereas, patients who had 4 to 7 LNs and > 7 LNs evaluated had comparable long-term mortality risk (HR = 1.10, 95%CI, 0.98-1.24; P = 0.11). There was no difference in the proportion of patients who had at least one metastatic LN identified per T category based on total number of nodes resected (all P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The overwhelming majority of patients did not have the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) recommended 6 total LN count . A machine-based learning approach identified evaluation of 4 to 7 LNs as the LN number associated with optimal staging and survival. While obtaining 6 LNs may be challenging, evaluation of at least 4 LNs may be a more appropriate threshold as this cut-off value was associated with optimal patient outcomes and staging.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gallbladder cancer; lymph nodes; number; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30864246     DOI: 10.1002/jso.25450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  4 in total

1.  Modification of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gallbladder carcinoma to improve prognostic precision.

Authors:  Wei Jiang; Bingqing Zhao; Yongcheng Li; Dunfeng Qi; Daxing Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 2.  Effect of the Number of Removed Lymph Nodes on Survival in Patients with FIGO Stage IB-IIA Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma following Open Radical Hysterectomy with Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Qinhao Guo; Yong Wu; Hao Wen; Xingzhu Ju; Xiaohua Wu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 3.  Current and New Biomarkers for Early Detection, Prognostic Stratification, and Management of Gallbladder Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Patricia García; Angela Lamarca; Javier Díaz; Enrique Carrera; Juan Carlos Roa
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Survival benefit of lymphadenectomy for gallbladder cancer based on the therapeutic index: An analysis of the US extrahepatic biliary malignancy consortium.

Authors:  Kota Sahara; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Shishir K Maithel; Daniel E Abbott; George A Poultsides; Ioannis Hatzaras; Ryan C Fields; Matthew Weiss; Charles Scoggins; Chelsea A Isom; Kamran Idrees; Perry Shen; Itaru Endo; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.885

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.