Literature DB >> 30864052

A prospective computed tomography study of maxillofacial injuries in patients with head injury.

S Girish Rao1, Roshan Cherian Paramesh2, Aseem Bansal1, Dhaval Shukla3, Nishanth Sadashiva3, Jitender Saini4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Road traffic accidents (RTA) are one of the foremost causes of head injuries and its prevalence is more in developing countries owing to its unorganised road utilisation system. Maxillofacial injuries occur in 5-33% of all trauma cases universally and are commonly associated with head injury (HI). AIM AND
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective study is to determine the incidence and pattern of facial fractures in head injury patients and to evaluate the relationship between them. Does the midface acts as a cushion to the brain when subjected to trauma?
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hospital records of 500 consecutive patients admitted with head injury in a Tertiary Health Care Centre (National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences) in Bangalore between March and June 2015 were included in the study.
RESULTS: Out of the total of 500 patients, the overall incidence of maxillofacial fractures among head injury patients was found to be 8.6%. Out of the 43 cases of maxillofacial involvement, the most commonly fractured facial bone was the maxilla (5.4%). All the cases of maxillofacial fractures due to RTA involved two-wheel vehicles and none of those cases had helmet protection at the time of the incident. 4.4% of study participants had sustained maxillofacial injuries while under the influence of alcohol.
CONCLUSION: In our study of head injury patients, the most common aetiology of maxillofacial fractures was found to be RTA with drivers being most affected. Alcohol intoxication and lack of helmet protection played a significant role in causing maxillofacial fractures. We concluded that maxillofacial fractures are closely related to head injury especially in cases of RTA.
© 2019. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography scan; Head injury; Maxillofacial fracture; Trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30864052     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-019-01099-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   2.374


  3 in total

1.  [Regulation of the remnant receptor].

Authors:  U Beisiegel
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1990

Review 2.  CT for acute stage of closed head injury.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Toyama; Takuya Kobayashi; Yoshihiro Nishiyama; Katashi Satoh; Motoomi Ohkawa; Keisuke Seki
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2005-08

3.  Head injury and associated maxillofacial injuries.

Authors:  Derek Goodisson; Martin MacFarlane; Leslie Snape; Balsam Darwish
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2004-09-10
  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Facial fractures and associated injuries in high- versus low-energy trauma: all are not created equal.

Authors:  Cameron St Hilaire; Arianne Johnson; Caitlin Loseth; Hamid Alipour; Nick Faunce; Stephen Kaminski; Rohit Sharma
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-06-24

2.  Focus on craniomaxillofacial injuries in trauma patients.

Authors:  Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 2.374

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.