Jack H Ruddell1, Adam E M Eltorai2, Mena Bakhit3, Arman M Lateef2, Steven F Moss3. 1. Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Box G-A1, Providence, RI, 02912, USA. jack_ruddell@brown.edu. 2. Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Box G-A1, Providence, RI, 02912, USA. 3. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Abstract
GOAL: To assess publicly available content derived from official websites of accredited gastroenterology fellowship programs, specifically evaluating data pertinent to prospective applicants. BACKGROUND: The Internet provides access to key information for applicants applying to gastroenterology fellowship, particularly as competition drives applicants to apply to a large number of programs. Thus, it is important for fellowship program websites to be up to date and contain accurate and pertinent information. METHODS: Twenty-nine variables, determined as important website content on the basis of prior published website analyses and from surveys of preferences, were extracted from the relevant websites of all accredited gastroenterology fellowships in the USA. Results were binary-i.e., a website either contained or did not contain each item. RESULTS: A total of 178 websites were evaluated. The mean number of online content items was 14.1(± 3.2 SD) out of a possible 29 (47.1%). Program coordinator contact information, application information, and the number of current fellows were accessible on > 80% of websites. In contrast, the typical number and types of procedures performed by fellows and number of hospitals covered by fellows on call were found on < 10% of websites. Analysis revealed that 23.2% of lifestyle, 48.3% of training, and 59.6% of program variables were met. CONCLUSIONS: Gastroenterology fellowship websites lacked important content. Websites had a lower mean percentage of lifestyle content compared to training and program-related items. An organized website containing relevant information may not only attract qualified applicants but also avert unnecessary email inquiries and inappropriate applications. This study may provide guidance to gastroenterology fellowship programs seeking to improve their websites for applicants.
GOAL: To assess publicly available content derived from official websites of accredited gastroenterology fellowship programs, specifically evaluating data pertinent to prospective applicants. BACKGROUND: The Internet provides access to key information for applicants applying to gastroenterology fellowship, particularly as competition drives applicants to apply to a large number of programs. Thus, it is important for fellowship program websites to be up to date and contain accurate and pertinent information. METHODS: Twenty-nine variables, determined as important website content on the basis of prior published website analyses and from surveys of preferences, were extracted from the relevant websites of all accredited gastroenterology fellowships in the USA. Results were binary-i.e., a website either contained or did not contain each item. RESULTS: A total of 178 websites were evaluated. The mean number of online content items was 14.1(± 3.2 SD) out of a possible 29 (47.1%). Program coordinator contact information, application information, and the number of current fellows were accessible on > 80% of websites. In contrast, the typical number and types of procedures performed by fellows and number of hospitals covered by fellows on call were found on < 10% of websites. Analysis revealed that 23.2% of lifestyle, 48.3% of training, and 59.6% of program variables were met. CONCLUSIONS: Gastroenterology fellowship websites lacked important content. Websites had a lower mean percentage of lifestyle content compared to training and program-related items. An organized website containing relevant information may not only attract qualified applicants but also avert unnecessary email inquiries and inappropriate applications. This study may provide guidance to gastroenterology fellowship programs seeking to improve their websites for applicants.
Authors: Larry F Chu; Chelsea A Young; Abby K Zamora; Derek Lowe; Dan B Hoang; Ronald G Pearl; Alex Macario Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2010-11-16 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Peter F Svider; Amar Gupta; Andrew P Johnson; Giancarlo Zuliani; Mahdi A Shkoukani; Jean Anderson Eloy; Adam J Folbe Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: David R Hansberry; Jonathan Bornstein; Nitin Agarwal; Kristen E McClure; Sandeep P Deshmukh; Suzanne Long Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 5.532