| Literature DB >> 30863641 |
Taklo Simeneh Yazie1, Teferra Abula Orjino2, Wondwossen Amogne Degu3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), a drug broadly used in combination antiretroviral therapy, is associated with renal dysfunction but the prevalence varied from country to country and it is not known in Ethiopia. The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence of renal dysfunction and risk factors associated with it and the mean change in estimated glomerular filtration rate in human immunodeficiency virus infected patients receiving TDF based antiretroviral regimen at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30863641 PMCID: PMC6377960 DOI: 10.1155/2019/9172607
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nephrol
Baseline sociodemographic characteristics of study participants in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH), October 2017 [n = 63].
| Characteristics | Frequency (%) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| Male | 20 (31.7) |
| Female | 43 (68.3) | |
|
| Single | 8 (12.7) |
| Married | 40 (63.5) | |
| Divorced | 11 (17.5) | |
| Widowed | 2 (3.2) | |
| Missing | 2 (3.2) | |
|
| Illiterate | 5 (7.9) |
| Primary | 18 (28.6) | |
| Secondary | 28 (44.4) | |
| Diploma | 5 (7.9) | |
| Degree | 7 (11.1) | |
|
| Oromo | 20 (31.7) |
| Amhara | 22 (34.9) | |
| Tigre | 6 (9.5) | |
| Others | 15 (23.8) | |
|
| governmental employee | 12 (19) |
| private | 34 (54) | |
| not employed | 17 (27) | |
|
| ≤50 years old | 56 (88.9) |
| >50 years old | 7 (11.1) | |
|
| <18.5 | 12 (19) |
| ≥18.5 | 51 (81) | |
Note: other ethnic groups include mixed ethnicity, Gurage, Silte, Hadiya, Welayta, and Harari.
Baseline clinical characteristics of study participants in TASH [n = 63].
| Characteristics | Frequency (%) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| Stage 1 | 42 (66.7) |
| Stage 2 | 3 (4.8) | |
| Stage 3 | 6 (9.5) | |
| Stage 4 | 12 (19) | |
|
| Yes | 42 (66.7) |
| No | 21 (33.3) | |
|
| Median (IQR) 3 (0-60) months | |
| < 3 months | 37 (58.7) | |
| ≥3 months | 26 (41.3) | |
|
| Median (IQR) 241 (106-457) | |
| < 200 CD4 count | 29 (46) | |
| ≥ 200 CD4 count | 34 (54) | |
|
| Mean (±SD) 1.01 (±0.16) | |
| < 1 | 18 (28.6) | |
| ≥1 | 45 (71.4) | |
|
| Mean (±SD) 90.8 (±16.8) | |
| < 90 | 35(55.6) | |
| ≥90 | 28 (44.4) | |
|
| Yes | 8 (12.7) |
| No | 55 (87.3) | |
|
| Yes | 4 (6.3) |
| No | 59 (93.7) | |
|
| Yes | 6 (9.5) |
| No | 57 (90.5) | |
|
| Yes | 9 (14.3) |
| No | 54 (85.7) | |
|
| Yes | 4 (6.3) |
| No | 59 (93.7) | |
|
| +1 | 9 (14.3) |
| +2 | 4 (6.3) | |
|
| +1 | 2 (3.2) |
| +3 | 1 (1.6) |
WHO, World Health Organization; DX, diagnosis; IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation; NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Greater than 25% fall in estimated glomerular filtration rate of study participants in TASH, October 2017 [n = 63].
| Greater than 25% decline in eGFR | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| New cases | Total cases | ||
|
| 0 | - | - |
| 1 | 10 (15.9) | 10 (15.9) | |
| 2 | 2 (3.2) | 9 (14.3) | |
| 6 | 4 (6.3) | 13 (20.6) | |
Note: glomerular filtration rate was estimated by CKD EPI equation and events expressed in number (percent); eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate in ml/min/1.73m2. New cases mean cases that occurred newly at each visit. Total cases mean sum of cases that occurred in previous study visit (that persisted) and new cases that occurred at a given visit.
Chronic kidney disease among study participants in TASH, October 2017 [n = 63].
| eGFR < 60ml/min/1.73m2 measured at 1 point of time | eGFR < 60ml/min/1.73m2 measured at 4-month interval | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number (%) | Number (%) | ||
|
| 0 | 0 (0) | - |
| 1 | 7 (11.1) | - | |
| 2 | 4 (6.3) | - | |
| 6 | 3 (4.8) | 2 (3.2) | |
Factors associated with greater than 25% fall in eGFR during the study period by univariate and multivariable logistic regression in TASH, October 2017 [n = 63].
| Variable | Category | Renal dysfunction | Univariate COR (95% CI) | Multivariable AOR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||||
|
| Male | 7 | 13 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Female | 9 | 34 | 0.5 (0.20, 1.64) | 19.0 (0.30, 1338.12) | |
|
| ≤ 50 years | 13 | 43 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| > 50 years | 3 | 4 | 2.5 (0.49, 12.54) | 64.8(1.60, 2707.70) | |
|
| < 18.5 | 3 | 9 | 1.0 (0.23, 4.16) | 0.08 (0.01, 3.40) |
| ≥18.5 | 13 | 38 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
|
| < 200 CD4 count | 13 | 16 | 8.4 (2.10, 33.80) | 63.2(2.02, 1979.66) |
| ≥200 CD4 count | 3 | 31 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
|
| TDF+3TC+EFV | 15 | 41 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| TDF+3TC+ATV/r | 1 | 6 | 0.5 (0.50, 4.10) | 0.1 (0.01, 32.90) | |
|
| Yes | 15 | 27 | 11.1 (1.40, 92.10) | 0.91 (0.04, 22.43) |
| No | 1 | 20 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
|
| Yes | 5 | 3 | 6.7 (1.40, 32.30) | 36.6 (0.50, 2699.88) |
| No | 11 | 44 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
|
| Yes | 2 | 2 | 3.2 (0.40, 25.00) | 3.74 (0.02, 938.60) |
| No | 14 | 45 | 1.0 | ||
|
| < 1mg/dl | 7 | 11 | 2.6 (0.80, 8.40) | 0.35(0.01, 9.90) |
| ≥ 1mg/dl | 9 | 36 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
|
| < 90 | 5 | 30 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| ≥ 90 | 11 | 17 | 3.9 (1.15, 13.06) | 11.6(0.23, 587.30) | |
|
| Yes | 8 | 5 | 8.4 (2.20, 32.30) | 51.33(1.80, 1448.70) |
| No | 8 | 42 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
|
| Yes | 2 | 1 | 6.6(0.60, 78.00) | 53.0 (0.49, 5774.33) |
| No | 14 | 46 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
COR, crude odds ratio; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ART, antiretroviral therapy; 3TC, lamivudine; EFV, efavirenz; ATV/r, ritonavir boosted atazanavir. ∗ indicates variables that were entered in univariate logistic regression; ∗∗ indicates variables which were significant in multivariate logistic regression (P < 0.05).
Changing patterns of estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine over 6-month follow-up of study participants in TASH, October 2017 [n = 63].
| Months | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |
|
| 90.81 ± 16.8 | 82.46 ± 17 | 82.93 ± 15.3 | 82.44 ± 15 |
|
| - | -8.35 ± 17.5 | -7.89 ± 15.10 | -8.37 ± 18.4 |
| - | -12.81, -3.8 | -11.70, -4.10 | -13.00, -3.70 | |
|
| 1.01 ± 0.16 | 1.10 ± 0.19 | 1.09 ± 0.17 | 1.10 ± 0.17 |
|
| - | 0.09 ± 0.18 | 0.08 ± 0.17 | -0.08 ± 0.19 |
| - | 0.05, 0.14 | 0.04, 0.12 | 0.04, 0.13 | |
Note: eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; SEM, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval; SCr, serum creatinine. P values by repeated measures one-way ANOVA (∗ stands for P < 0.05) and post hoc tests using paired t-test with Bonferroni correction (+ stands for P < 0.05).