Literature DB >> 30862715

Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Inhibition Can Resensitize p53-Null Stem Cells to Cancer Chemotherapy.

Changlong Liu1, Carolyn E Banister1, Phillip J Buckhaults2.   

Abstract

TP53 mutations are common in most human cancers, but few therapeutic options for TP53-mutant tumors exist. To identify potential therapeutic options for cancer patients with TP53 mutations, we profiled 127 FDA-approved chemotherapy drugs against human embryonic stem cells (hESC) in which we engineered TP53 deletion by genome editing. We identified 27 cancer therapeutic drugs for which TP53 mutations conferred resistance; most of these drugs target DNA synthesis or topoisomerase and cause DNA damage. We then performed a genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screen in the TP53-null hESC in the presence and absence of sublethal concentrations of cisplatin and identified 137 genes whose loss selectively resensitized the p53-null cells to this chemotherapeutic agent. Gene ontology classification of the resensitizing loci revealed significant overrepresentation of spindle checkpoint pathway genes. Moreover, we confirmed that targeting ZNF207/BuGZ sensitizes p53-null hESC to cisplatin. These data indicate that targeted inhibition of spindle assembly checkpoints (SAC) and chromosomal organizing centers may provide a way to treat p53-deficient cancer cells with standard chemotherapy drugs. Development of small-molecule inhibitors of SAC proteins may be a useful strategy for rescuing DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics in TP53-mutant cancers. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings show that inhibition of spindle assembly checkpoints and chromosomal organizing centers may provide a new way to treat p53-deficient cancer cells with standard chemotherapy drugs. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30862715      PMCID: PMC6497569          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  49 in total

Review 1.  Clonal Heterogeneity and Tumor Evolution: Past, Present, and the Future.

Authors:  Nicholas McGranahan; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells.

Authors:  Ophir Shalem; Neville E Sanjana; Ella Hartenian; Xi Shi; David A Scott; Tarjei Mikkelson; Dirk Heckl; Benjamin L Ebert; David E Root; John G Doench; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system.

Authors:  Tim Wang; Jenny J Wei; David M Sabatini; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  High-Resolution CRISPR Screens Reveal Fitness Genes and Genotype-Specific Cancer Liabilities.

Authors:  Traver Hart; Megha Chandrashekhar; Michael Aregger; Zachary Steinhart; Kevin R Brown; Graham MacLeod; Monika Mis; Michal Zimmermann; Amelie Fradet-Turcotte; Song Sun; Patricia Mero; Peter Dirks; Sachdev Sidhu; Frederick P Roth; Olivia S Rissland; Daniel Durocher; Stephane Angers; Jason Moffat
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Complete loss of the tumor suppressor MAD2 causes premature cyclin B degradation and mitotic failure in human somatic cells.

Authors:  Loren Michel; Elena Diaz-Rodriguez; Gopeshwar Narayan; Eva Hernando; Vundavalli V V S Murty; Robert Benezra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Genomic Copy Number Dictates a Gene-Independent Cell Response to CRISPR/Cas9 Targeting.

Authors:  Andrew J Aguirre; Robin M Meyers; Barbara A Weir; Francisca Vazquez; Cheng-Zhong Zhang; Uri Ben-David; April Cook; Gavin Ha; William F Harrington; Mihir B Doshi; Maria Kost-Alimova; Stanley Gill; Han Xu; Levi D Ali; Guozhi Jiang; Sasha Pantel; Yenarae Lee; Amy Goodale; Andrew D Cherniack; Coyin Oh; Gregory Kryukov; Glenn S Cowley; Levi A Garraway; Kimberly Stegmaier; Charles W Roberts; Todd R Golub; Matthew Meyerson; David E Root; Aviad Tsherniak; William C Hahn
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 7.  Aneuploidy: instigator and inhibitor of tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Beth A A Weaver; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Identification of aneuploidy-selective antiproliferation compounds.

Authors:  Yun-Chi Tang; Bret R Williams; Jake J Siegel; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase.

Authors:  Helen E Bryant; Niklas Schultz; Huw D Thomas; Kayan M Parker; Dan Flower; Elena Lopez; Suzanne Kyle; Mark Meuth; Nicola J Curtin; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 69.504

10.  Methods for High-throughput Drug Combination Screening and Synergy Scoring.

Authors:  Liye He; Evgeny Kulesskiy; Jani Saarela; Laura Turunen; Krister Wennerberg; Tero Aittokallio; Jing Tang
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2018
View more
  7 in total

1.  Identification, characterization and functional analysis of gonadal long noncoding RNAs in a protogynous hermaphroditic teleost fish, the ricefield eel (Monopterus albus).

Authors:  Zhi He; Lijuan Ye; Deying Yang; Zhijun Ma; Faqiang Deng; Zhide He; Jiaxiang Hu; Hongjun Chen; Li Zheng; Yong Pu; Yuanyuan Jiao; Qiqi Chen; Kuo Gao; Jinxin Xiong; Bolin Lai; Xiaobin Gu; Xiaoli Huang; Shiyong Yang; Mingwang Zhang; Taiming Yan
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.547

2.  Efficient Simultaneous Introduction of Premature Stop Codons in Three Tumor Suppressor Genes in PFFs via a Cytosine Base Editor.

Authors:  Haoyun Jiang; Qiqi Jing; Qiang Yang; Chuanmin Qiao; Yaya Liao; Weiwei Liu; Yuyun Xing
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 4.141

3.  MiR-9-3p regulates the biological functions and drug resistance of gemcitabine-treated breast cancer cells and affects tumor growth through targeting MTDH.

Authors:  Yike Wang; Lifeng Dong; Fang Wan; Fangfang Chen; Dianlei Liu; Deqin Chen; Jingpei Long
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 8.469

4.  TP53 inhibitor PFTα increases the sensitivity of arsenic trioxide in TP53 wildtype tumor cells.

Authors:  Haiwei Wang; Xinrui Wang; Liangpu Xu; Ji Zhang
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.693

5.  System analysis based on the cancer-immunity cycle identifies ZNF207 as a novel immunotherapy target for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xu Wang; Tao Zhou; Xingyi Chen; Yu Wang; Yushi Ding; Haoyang Tu; Shengyang Gao; Haoyu Wang; Xinying Tang; Yong Yang
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 13.751

6.  A role for the mitotic proteins Bub3 and BuGZ in transcriptional regulation of catalase-3 expression.

Authors:  Yike Zhou; Shuangjie Shen; Chengcheng Du; Ying Wang; Yi Liu; Qun He
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 6.020

7.  Genome instability and pressure on non-homologous end joining drives chemotherapy resistance via a DNA repair crisis switch in triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Adrian P Wiegmans; Ambber Ward; Ekaterina Ivanova; Pascal H G Duijf; Mark N Adams; Idris Mohd Najib; Romy Van Oosterhout; Martin C Sadowski; Greg Kelly; Scott W Morrical; Ken O'Byrne; Jason S Lee; Derek J Richard
Journal:  NAR Cancer       Date:  2021-06-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.