Hélio José Coelho-Júnior1, Ivan de Oliveira Gonçalvez2, Ricardo Aurélio Carvalho Sampaio3, Priscila Yukari Sewo Sampaio3, Eduardo Lusa Cadore4, Mikel Izquierdo5, Emanuele Marzetti6, Marco Carlos Uchida3. 1. Applied Kinesiology Laboratory-AKL, School of Physical Education, University of Campinas, Av. Érico Veríssimo, 701, Cidade Universitária "Zeferino Vaz", Barão Geraldo, CEP: 13.083-851 Campinas, SP, Brazil; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: helio.j.coelho.junior@gmail.com. 2. Center of Health Sciences, University of Mogi das Cruzes, Mogi das Cruzes, Brazil. 3. Applied Kinesiology Laboratory-AKL, School of Physical Education, University of Campinas, Av. Érico Veríssimo, 701, Cidade Universitária "Zeferino Vaz", Barão Geraldo, CEP: 13.083-851 Campinas, SP, Brazil. 4. School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Dance, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. 5. Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarre, CIBERFES (CB16/10/00315), Pamplona, Navarre, Spain. 6. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although combining classical resistance (RT) and power training (PT) might be an efficient strategy to achieve optimal enhancements in body composition and physical function in older adults, the most effective approach to combine these different types of exercise training is still unknown. Periodization, an organizational model that refers to a succession of cycle that will vary in exercise intensity and/or volume to allow for the training stimulus to remain biologically challenging and effective, may represent an interesting approach. Among the different types of periodization, daily undulating periodization (DUP) has attracted considerable attention given its superiority in comparison to nonperiodized (NP) RT programs to elicit neuromuscular improvements in young adults. However, whether a DUP program combining PT and traditional RT can produce similar or greater improvements in body composition and physical function in older adults than a NP RT program has not yet been established. Therefore, the present study compared the effects of a DUP and NP programs on body composition and physical function in healthy community-dwelling older women. METHODS:Forty-two older women (60-79 years) were randomized into one of the three experimental groups: NP, DUP, and control group (CG). Body composition and physical function were assessed at baseline and after the intervention. The sessions of exercises were performed twice a week over 22 weeks. In NP, the two exercise sessions were based on three sets of 8-10 repetitions at a "difficult" intensity (i.e., 5-6) prescribed based on the Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale. In DUP, the first session was based on PT (three sets of 8-10 repetitions at a "moderate" intensity, i.e., 3, performed as fast as possible), while the second session was similar to the NP. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in body composition in any of the groups. Relative to baseline, participants assigned to NP showed significant improvements in countermovement jump (+55.7%), timed "Up and Go" (TUG) test (-43.2%, faster), walking speed (+12.0%), and one-leg-stand (+154.5%). In contrast, DUP only improved TUG performance (-53.2%, faster). CONCLUSION:NP and DUP improved physical function in community-dwelling older women, with greater improvements in physical parameters only observed after NP.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although combining classical resistance (RT) and power training (PT) might be an efficient strategy to achieve optimal enhancements in body composition and physical function in older adults, the most effective approach to combine these different types of exercise training is still unknown. Periodization, an organizational model that refers to a succession of cycle that will vary in exercise intensity and/or volume to allow for the training stimulus to remain biologically challenging and effective, may represent an interesting approach. Among the different types of periodization, daily undulating periodization (DUP) has attracted considerable attention given its superiority in comparison to nonperiodized (NP) RT programs to elicit neuromuscular improvements in young adults. However, whether a DUP program combining PT and traditional RT can produce similar or greater improvements in body composition and physical function in older adults than a NP RT program has not yet been established. Therefore, the present study compared the effects of a DUP and NP programs on body composition and physical function in healthy community-dwelling older women. METHODS: Forty-two older women (60-79 years) were randomized into one of the three experimental groups: NP, DUP, and control group (CG). Body composition and physical function were assessed at baseline and after the intervention. The sessions of exercises were performed twice a week over 22 weeks. In NP, the two exercise sessions were based on three sets of 8-10 repetitions at a "difficult" intensity (i.e., 5-6) prescribed based on the Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale. In DUP, the first session was based on PT (three sets of 8-10 repetitions at a "moderate" intensity, i.e., 3, performed as fast as possible), while the second session was similar to the NP. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in body composition in any of the groups. Relative to baseline, participants assigned to NP showed significant improvements in countermovement jump (+55.7%), timed "Up and Go" (TUG) test (-43.2%, faster), walking speed (+12.0%), and one-leg-stand (+154.5%). In contrast, DUP only improved TUG performance (-53.2%, faster). CONCLUSION: NP and DUP improved physical function in community-dwelling older women, with greater improvements in physical parameters only observed after NP.
Authors: Hélio José Coelho-Júnior; Marco Carlos Uchida; Anna Picca; Roberto Bernabei; Francesco Landi; Riccardo Calvani; Matteo Cesari; Emanuele Marzetti Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2021-02-15 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Lynda B Ransdell; Heidi A Wayment; Nanette Lopez; Cori Lorts; Anna L Schwartz; Karen Pugliesi; Patricia S Pohl; Dierdra Bycura; Ricky Camplain Journal: Women (Basel) Date: 2021-09-14
Authors: Hélio José Coelho-Júnior; Ivan de Oliveira Gonçalves; Ricardo Aurélio Carvalho Sampaio; Priscila Yukari Sewo Sampaio; Eduardo Lusa Cadore; Riccardo Calvani; Anna Picca; Mikel Izquierdo; Emanuele Marzetti; Marco Carlos Uchida Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Hélio J Coelho-Júnior; Samuel da Silva Aguiar; Riccardo Calvani; Anna Picca; Denise de Azevedo Carvalho; Juliana da Costa Zwarg-Sá; Michel Audiffren; Emanuele Marzetti; Marco Carlos Uchida Journal: J Aging Res Date: 2021-08-02
Authors: Eduardo Vásquez-Araneda; Rodrigo Ignacio Solís-Vivanco; Sandra Mahecha-Matsudo; Rafael Zapata-Lamana; Igor Cigarroa Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-10 Impact factor: 3.390