Literature DB >> 30861398

How participation influences the perception of fairness, efficiency and effectiveness in environmental governance: An empirical analysis.

Anna Ernst1.   

Abstract

Participation processes can improve environmental decision-making. However, proving the impact of participation processes - i.e. decision-making involving diverse actors from civil society, business, state, and administration - is challenging. This paper therefore examines participation processes by applying proxy measures that are assumed to strongly correlate with improved environmental decision-making. Such indicators include the perception of the process as being fair and legitimate, the final outcomes being considered effective and efficient, satisfaction with one's own engagement and the development of trust, and conflict resolution. Participation process characteristics such as participation format and facilitation are assumed to have an impact on these indicators. This study examined participation processes in relation to the German energy transformation (Energiewende), asking respondents about their experience of participation, their perception of the process, and also about intermediate outcomes such as trust building and conflict resolution. An online survey was conducted, resulting in 516 valid responses. The results show that participation processes related to the Energiewende are often perceived as fair and legitimate. Moreover, the findings provide a better understanding of the relationships between participation process characteristics and desirable intermediate outcomes, such as trust and conflict resolution, as well as normative process factors. The intensity of a participation process - i.e. whether it is dialogic or a written consultation process - had no significant influence either on normative process factors, such as procedural fairness, or on trust or conflict resolution. Instead, a trustworthy moderator and the integration of all affected interests are important participation process characteristics that could determine the success of the decision-making process.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords:  Decision-making; Empirical analysis; Energy transformation; Environmental governance; Germany; Participation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30861398     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  2 in total

1.  The Relationship among Government, Enterprise, and Public in Environmental Governance from the Perspective of Multi-Player Evolutionary Game.

Authors:  Yingxin Chen; Jing Zhang; Pandu R Tadikamalla; Xutong Gao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  The Impact of Government Official Assessment on Ecological Poverty Alleviation: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies.

Authors:  Yujing Huang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.