Literature DB >> 30861389

Contact angles: From past mistakes to new developments through liquid-solid adhesion measurements.

Jaroslaw W Drelich1.   

Abstract

A contact angle observed for a liquid-solid system is not necessarily a unique value and a few different contact angles need to be carefully considered in relation to liquid spreading, adhesion and phase separation. Despite the conceptual simplicity of the contact angle and over 200 years of investigation, interpretations of experimental contact angles remain controversial, and mistakes are quite common. Here, the physics behind equilibrium contact angles are restated and their misuse in modern literature is briefly discussed. Selected advances made in the 20th century that shaped current interpretations of experimental contact angles are also critically reviewed and evaluated. Understanding of contact angles for liquids on solids has improved in the last two decades and this progress is driven by advanced imaging techniques and improved methodologies in contact angle measurements, often in tandem with direct force measurements for liquid droplets in contact with solids. In our laboratory, a microelectronic balance system is employed to measure the force of liquid droplet spontaneous spreading and the water-solid adhesion forces at different stages of droplet retraction and separation. A microbalance equipped with a camera and data acquisition software measures these forces directly, monitors droplet-surface separation including distances over which the droplet stretches, and collects optical images simultaneously. The images are used to analyze capillary and surface tension forces based on measured droplet dimensions, shapes of surfaces and values of contact angles. These force measurements have significantly furthered our fundamental understanding of advancing, receding and most stable contact angles, and their correlations with adhesion, and are summarized in this review.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contact angle; Liquid-solid adhesion; Wetting

Year:  2019        PMID: 30861389     DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2019.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci        ISSN: 0001-8686            Impact factor:   12.984


  6 in total

1.  The Measurement of Contact Angle, pH, and Conductivity of Artificial Saliva and Mouthwashes on Enamel, Glass-Ionomer, and Composite Dental Materials.

Authors:  Saima Qureshi; Lazar Milić; Bojan Petrović; Marija Vejin; Sanja Kojić; Stefan Jarić; Goran Stojanović
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Effect of the Composition of Copolymers Based on Glycidyl Methacrylate and Fluoroalkyl Methacrylates on the Free Energy and Lyophilic Properties of the Modified Surface.

Authors:  Viktor V Klimov; Olga V Kolyaganova; Evgeny V Bryuzgin; Alexander V Navrotsky; Ivan A Novakov
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.967

3.  Capillary Bridges on Hydrophobic Surfaces: Analytical Contact Angle Determination.

Authors:  Norbert Nagy
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.882

4.  Wetting between Cassie-Baxter and Wenzel regimes: a cellular model approach.

Authors:  Katarzyna Mądry; Waldemar Nowicki
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 1.890

5.  Sessile Drop Method: Critical Analysis and Optimization for Measuring the Contact Angle of an Ion-Exchange Membrane Surface.

Authors:  Maria Ponomar; Ekaterina Krasnyuk; Dmitrii Butylskii; Victor Nikonenko; Yaoming Wang; Chenxiao Jiang; Tongwen Xu; Natalia Pismenskaya
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-04

6.  Durability of Lubricated Icephobic Coatings under Various Environmental Stresses.

Authors:  Valentina Donadei; Heli Koivuluoto; Essi Sarlin; Petri Vuoristo
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.329

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.