Siqing Lian1, Qi Chen2, Mi Yao3, Chunhua Chi1, Michael D Fetters4. 1. Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China. 2. Institute for Medical Humanities, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China. 3. Beijing Xicheng District Xinjiekou Community Health Service Center, Beijing, China. 4. Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To achieve the goal of 300,000 general practitioners by 2020-an increase of 215,200 in a decade-China is utilizing multiple training pathways. To comprehensively illustrate general practitioner training strategies in China, this article introduces and describes these pathways. METHODS: We used descriptive policy analysis. This involved taking an inventory of existing literature and source documents and developing a model to illustrate pathways for training general practice physicians. RESULTS: The rural doctor pathway represents rural clinicians who had only basic training and practiced multiple years prior to training reforms. The 3+2 pathway to assistant general practitioners requires 3 years of junior college and 2 years of clinical training. The transfer pathway for current physicians requires 1-2 years of training. The 5+3 pathway comprises 5 years of bachelor of science degree training in clinical medicine and 3 years of standardized residency training. Despite the development of advanced degree programs, their use remains limited. CONCLUSIONS: These pathways illustrate significant heterogeneity in training of general practitioners. Training ranges from a 2-year technical degree to a doctorate with research. Emphasis on the 5+3 track shows promise for China's goals of improved quality and new goal of 500,000 additional general practitioners by 2030.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To achieve the goal of 300,000 general practitioners by 2020-an increase of 215,200 in a decade-China is utilizing multiple training pathways. To comprehensively illustrate general practitioner training strategies in China, this article introduces and describes these pathways. METHODS: We used descriptive policy analysis. This involved taking an inventory of existing literature and source documents and developing a model to illustrate pathways for training general practice physicians. RESULTS: The rural doctor pathway represents rural clinicians who had only basic training and practiced multiple years prior to training reforms. The 3+2 pathway to assistant general practitioners requires 3 years of junior college and 2 years of clinical training. The transfer pathway for current physicians requires 1-2 years of training. The 5+3 pathway comprises 5 years of bachelor of science degree training in clinical medicine and 3 years of standardized residency training. Despite the development of advanced degree programs, their use remains limited. CONCLUSIONS: These pathways illustrate significant heterogeneity in training of general practitioners. Training ranges from a 2-year technical degree to a doctorate with research. Emphasis on the 5+3 track shows promise for China's goals of improved quality and new goal of 500,000 additional general practitioners by 2030.