| Literature DB >> 30860981 |
Aaffien C Reijne1,2,3, A Talarovicova1,2,3, Jolita Ciapaite2,3, J E Bruggink1, A Bleeker2, Albert K Groen2,3, Dirk-Jan Reijngoud2,3, Barbara M Bakker2,3, Gertjan van Dijk1,4.
Abstract
Diet and physical activity are thought to affect sustainable metabolic health and survival. To improve understanding, we studied survival of mice feeding a low-fat (LF) or high-saturated fat/high sugar (HFS) diet, each with or without free running wheel (RW) access. Additionally several endocrine and metabolic health indices were assessed at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months of age. As expected, HFS feeding left-shifted survival curve of mice compared to LF feeding, and this was associated with increased energy intake and increased (visceral/total) adiposity, liver triglycerides, and increased plasma cholesterol, corticosterone, HOMA-IR, and lowered adiponectin levels. Several of these health parameters improved (transiently) by RW access in HFS and LF fed mice (i.e., HOMA-IR, plasma corticosterone), others however deteriorated (transiently) by RW access only in HFS-fed mice (i.e., body adiposity, plasma resistin, and free cholesterol levels). Apart from these multiple and sometimes diverging health effects of RW access, RW access did not affect survival curves. Important to note, voluntary RW activity declined with age, but this effect was most pronounced in the HFS fed mice. These results thus challenge the hypothesis that voluntary wheel running can counteract HFS-induced deterioration of survival and metabolic health.Entities:
Keywords: activity; aging; diets; hormones; survival
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30860981 PMCID: PMC6428087 DOI: 10.18632/aging.101857
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier survival curves of the four different experimental groups; two low fat (LF) diet groups, one sedentary (LF (-)RW) and one exercise group (LF (+)RW); and two high fat (HFS) groups, one sedentary (HFS (-)RW) and one exercise group (HFS (+)RW). Samples sizes were LF (-)RW n=119, LF (+)RW n=109, HFS (-)RW n=118, and HFS (+)RW n=100. There was a significant reduction in survival in sedentary mice on an HFS diet compared to LF diet (p<0.001, log-rank test) and there was a significant reduction in survival in exercising mice on a HFS diet compared to LF diet (p<0.01, log-rank test). The table below the figure indicates the three different percentiles of the four different experimental groups, the 50% percentile is also indicated with the dotted line in the figure.
Reasons and numbers of sacrifices during this study.
| Group | Severe weight loss / bad appearance | Scratching wounds | Anal problems | Eye infection | Cancer | Locomotion problems | Tilted head | Teeth/ | Experimental reasons | Death in cage | Total n |
| LF (-)RW (n=119) | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | n=23 | |||
| LF (+)RW (n=109) | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | n=21 | |||
| HFS (-)RW (n=118) | 10 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | n=40 | ||
| HFS (+)RW | 14 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | n=32 | ||
| Total n | n=37 | n=23 | n=5 | n=4 | n=3 | n=4 | n=3 | n=5 | n=5 | n=27 | n=116 |
On the different rows the different experimental groups are indicated, in the different columns the causes of death. Planned sacrifices (6, 12, 18 and 24 months) are excluded from these results.
Figure 2(A) Body weight development measured over their life time and indicated every 1.5 months. There was a significant reduction of body weight in mice on a LF diet (p<0.001), in mice with access to a running wheel (p<0.001), and an increase in body weight with age (p<0.001). Data are averages from n=18-104 mice per group; ± SEM. (B) Average 3 or 6 months energy intake. Data are averages from n=18-104 mice per group; ± SEM *p<0.05 **p<0.01 ***p<0.001 per time point analysis (Bonferonni corrected) (C) Absorption efficiencies for the four experimental groups at the four different time points. Absorption efficiencies were higher in mice on HFS diet compared to mice on a LF diet. Data are averages from n=2-3 mice per group; ± SEM *p<0.05, **p<0.01 per time point analysis (Bonferonni corrected).
Figure 3(A) Running wheel activity for the two different running wheel groups at five different time points. Activity was higher in mice on a LF diet (p<0.001) and activity decreased with age (p<0.001). Data are averages from n=15-50 mice per group; ± SEM. (B) Home cage activity for the four different groups at the four different time points. Activity was higher in mice with access to a running wheel (p<0.001) and was higher in mice on a LF diet (p<0.001). Data are averages from n=3-12 mice per group; ± SEM. (C) Daily energy expenditure (DEE) for the four different groups at the four different time points. Data are averages from n=7-8 mice per group; ± SEM **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 per time point analysis (Bonferonni corrected).
Figure 4(A) Dry lean mass, was higher in sedentary compared to running wheel mice (p<0.001). Data are averages from n=7-8 mice per group; + SEM. (B) Visceral fat mass at the four different ages. Data are averages from n=7-8 mice per group; + SEM ***p<0.001 (C) Subcutaneous fat mass at the four different ages. Data are averages from n-7-8 mice per group; ± SEM ***p<0.001, *p<0.05 (D) Liver triglycerides, increased with age (p<0.001) and on a HFS diet (p<0.001). Data are averages from n=7-8 mice per group; + SEM.
Figure 5Blood plasma results. (A) leptin was at young age higher in HFS diet groups (B) resistin was increased in mice on a HFS diet with access to a running wheel (C) adiponectin was higher in mice on a LF diet (D) cortisol was higher in mice on a HFS diet. Data are averages from n=6-8 mice per group; + SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 (per time point analysis (Bonferonni corrected)).
Figure 6Glucose and cholesterol blood plasma results. (A) Blood glucose after 6 hours of fasting; (B) Blood insulin after 6 hours of fasting, increased with age and eating a HFS diet and decreased with having access to a running wheel; (C) HOMA-IR index was improved in mice on a LF diet; (D) Total plasma cholesterol was higher in mice on a HFS diet; (E) free plasma cholesterol was highest in mice on a HFS diet in combination with access to a running wheel (F) plasma cholesteryl esters was higher in mice on a HFS diet. Data are averages from n=6-8 mice per group; + SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 (per time point analysis (Bonferonni corrected)).