Literature DB >> 30860572

Assessment of metagenomic assemblers based on hybrid reads of real and simulated metagenomic sequences.

Ziye Wang1, Ying Wang2, Jed A Fuhrman3, Fengzhu Sun4, Shanfeng Zhu5.   

Abstract

In metagenomic studies of microbial communities, the short reads come from mixtures of genomes. Read assembly is usually an essential first step for the follow-up studies in metagenomic research. Understanding the power and limitations of various read assembly programs in practice is important for researchers to choose which programs to use in their investigations. Many studies evaluating different assembly programs used either simulated metagenomes or real metagenomes with unknown genome compositions. However, the simulated datasets may not reflect the real complexities of metagenomic samples and the estimated assembly accuracy could be misleading due to the unknown genomes in real metagenomes. Therefore, hybrid strategies are required to evaluate the various read assemblers for metagenomic studies. In this paper, we benchmark the metagenomic read assemblers by mixing reads from real metagenomic datasets with reads from known genomes and evaluating the integrity, contiguity and accuracy of the assembly using the reads from the known genomes. We selected four advanced metagenome assemblers, MEGAHIT, MetaSPAdes, IDBA-UD and Faucet, for evaluation. We showed the strengths and weaknesses of these assemblers in terms of integrity, contiguity and accuracy for different variables, including the genetic difference of the real genomes with the genome sequences in the real metagenomic datasets and the sequencing depth of the simulated datasets. Overall, MetaSPAdes performs best in terms of integrity and continuity at the species-level, followed by MEGAHIT. Faucet performs best in terms of accuracy at the cost of worst integrity and continuity, especially at low sequencing depth. MEGAHIT has the highest genome fractions at the strain-level and MetaSPAdes has the overall best performance at the strain-level. MEGAHIT is the most efficient in our experiments. Availability: The source code is available at https://github.com/ziyewang/MetaAssemblyEval.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assembly; metagenomics; next-generation sequencing; performance comparison

Year:  2020        PMID: 30860572      PMCID: PMC7299307          DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbz025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  39 in total

1.  IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth.

Authors:  Yu Peng; Henry C M Leung; S M Yiu; Francis Y L Chin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Molecular analysis of the gut microbiota of identical twins with Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Johan Dicksved; Jonas Halfvarson; Magnus Rosenquist; Gunnar Järnerot; Curt Tysk; Juha Apajalahti; Lars Engstrand; Janet K Jansson
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 3.  Sequence assembly using next generation sequencing data--challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Francis Y L Chin; Henry C M Leung; S M Yiu
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 6.038

4.  Cancer immunity thwarted by the microbiome.

Authors:  Nadine Hartmann; Mitchell Kronenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity.

Authors:  Ruth E Ley; Peter J Turnbaugh; Samuel Klein; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  The microbiome in cancer immunotherapy: Diagnostic tools and therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Laurence Zitvogel; Yuting Ma; Didier Raoult; Guido Kroemer; Thomas F Gajewski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Ray Meta: scalable de novo metagenome assembly and profiling.

Authors:  Sébastien Boisvert; Frédéric Raymond; Elénie Godzaridis; François Laviolette; Jacques Corbeil
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 8.  Gut microbiota imbalance and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Johan Gagnière; Jennifer Raisch; Julie Veziant; Nicolas Barnich; Richard Bonnet; Emmanuel Buc; Marie-Agnès Bringer; Denis Pezet; Mathilde Bonnet
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Alterations of the human gut microbiome in liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Nan Qin; Fengling Yang; Ang Li; Edi Prifti; Yanfei Chen; Li Shao; Jing Guo; Emmanuelle Le Chatelier; Jian Yao; Lingjiao Wu; Jiawei Zhou; Shujun Ni; Lin Liu; Nicolas Pons; Jean Michel Batto; Sean P Kennedy; Pierre Leonard; Chunhui Yuan; Wenchao Ding; Yuanting Chen; Xinjun Hu; Beiwen Zheng; Guirong Qian; Wei Xu; S Dusko Ehrlich; Shusen Zheng; Lanjuan Li
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler.

Authors:  Sergey Nurk; Dmitry Meleshko; Anton Korobeynikov; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Introduction to the principles and methods underlying the recovery of metagenome-assembled genomes from metagenomic data.

Authors:  Gleb Goussarov; Mohamed Mysara; Peter Vandamme; Rob Van Houdt
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.904

2.  DNA- and RNA- Derived Fungal Communities in Subsurface Aquifers Only Partly Overlap but React Similarly to Environmental Factors.

Authors:  Ali Nawaz; Witoon Purahong; Martina Herrmann; Kirsten Küsel; François Buscot; Tesfaye Wubet
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-09-11

Review 3.  A roadmap for metagenomic enzyme discovery.

Authors:  Serina L Robinson; Jörn Piel; Shinichi Sunagawa
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 13.423

4.  Measuring quality of DNA sequence data via degradation.

Authors:  Alan F Karr; Jason Hauzel; Adam A Porter; Marcel Schaefer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Deep-Sea Sediments from the Southern Gulf of Mexico Harbor a Wide Diversity of PKS I Genes.

Authors:  Maikel Fernández-López; Ayixon Sánchez-Reyes; Clara Barcelos; Karla Sidón-Ceseña; Ricardo B Leite; Asunción Lago-Lestón
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-04

6.  Terabase-scale metagenome coassembly with MetaHipMer.

Authors:  Steven Hofmeyr; Rob Egan; Evangelos Georganas; Alex C Copeland; Robert Riley; Alicia Clum; Emiley Eloe-Fadrosh; Simon Roux; Eugene Goltsman; Aydın Buluç; Daniel Rokhsar; Leonid Oliker; Katherine Yelick
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.