Literature DB >> 30860198

Mentoring in a resource-constrained context: A single-institutional cross-sectional study of the prevalence, benefits, barriers and predictors among post-graduate medical college fellows and members in South-Eastern Nigeria.

Gabriel Uche Pascal Iloh1, Miracle Erinma Chukwuonye1, Obianma Nneka Onya2, Ezinne Uchamma Godswill-Uko3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Globally, the post-graduate medical education has undergone tremendous changes with emphasis on training, services and research to equip trainees with competence for independent professional development. However, not all the fellows and members of the West African Post-graduate Medical College and the National Post-graduate Medical College of Nigeria recognise the values of mentoring in achieving the career success. AIM: The study was aimed at describing the prevalence, benefits, barriers and predictors of mentoring in a cross-section of the Post-graduate Medical College fellows and members in a tertiary health institution in South-Eastern Nigeria. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out among 168 study participants who were sampled from the Post-graduate Medical College fellows and members in the Federal Medical Centre, Umuahia, Nigeria. Data collection was done using a pre-tested, self-administered questionnaire that elicited information on awareness, prevalence, barriers and benefits of mentoring.
RESULTS: The age of participants ranged from 26 to 59 (41 ± 9.4) years. All the respondents were aware of the mentorship. The prevalence of mentoring was 33.3%. The most common benefit was personal and professional growth and development (100.0%). The most common barrier was the pressure of professional duties and personal exigencies (100.0%). The most significant predictor of mentoring had departmental mentoring programme participants who had departmental mentoring programmes were two times more likely to have mentoring relationships when compared to their counterparts who had none (adjusted odds ratio = 2.32; 95% confidence interval: 1.20-3.10; P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: The level of awareness of mentoring was very high but did not translate to appropriate involvement in mentoring. The most common benefit was personal and professional growth and development. The most common barrier was the pressure of professional duties and personal exigencies. The most significant predictor of mentoring relationship had departmental mentoring programme.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fellows; Nigeria; members; mentoring; post-graduate medical colleges; prevalence

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30860198     DOI: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_173_18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Niger Postgrad Med J


  2 in total

1.  Building Research Capacity in HIV and Noncommunicable Diseases in Africa: A Mentorship and Leadership Workshop Report.

Authors:  Muktar H Aliyu; Mahmoud U Sani; Donna J Ingles; Fatimah I Tsiga-Ahmed; Baba M Musa; Aimalohi A Ahonkhai; Hamisu M Salihu; Carolyn M Audet; C William Wester
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.190

2.  The role of mentoring, supervision, coaching, teaching and instruction on professional identity formation: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Rachelle Qi En Toh; Kai Kee Koh; Jun Kiat Lua; Ruth Si Man Wong; Elaine Li Ying Quah; Aiswarya Panda; Chong Yao Ho; Nicole-Ann Lim; Yun Ting Ong; Keith Zi Yuan Chua; Victoria Wen Wei Ng; Sabine Lauren Chyi Hui Wong; Luke Yu Xuan Yeo; Sin Yee See; Jolene Jing Yin Teo; Yaazhini Renganathan; Annelissa Mien Chew Chin; Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.263

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.