Literature DB >> 30859399

Socioeconomic effects of protected areas in Spain across spatial scales and protection levels.

David Rodríguez-Rodríguez1,2, Iván López3.   

Abstract

Impacts of the legal designation of protected areas (PAs) may have contrasting implications for different stakeholders, and at different spatial scales. In this study, we analysed the organisational perception on the socioeconomic effects of PA designation from all sectors of activity in Spain, accounting for PAs' legal stringency. A semi-structured questionnaire was administered to 68 organisations at national, regional (Andalusia) and local scales (two municipalities in the Almeria province, Andalusia) through an online survey. Local stakeholders and the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors were most concerned about the social and economic impacts of PAs designation on their organisations. By contrast, organisations at the national or regional scales together with public institutions, the quaternary sector and other miscellaneous stakeholders perceived predominantly positive effects. Only national organisations perceived an increase in local social and economic effects from the designation of legally stringent PAs with regard to multiple-use PAs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Europe; Institutional stance; National park; Natura 2000 site; Stakeholder; Sustainability

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30859399      PMCID: PMC6888791          DOI: 10.1007/s13280-019-01160-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  9 in total

1.  Protected areas reduced poverty in Costa Rica and Thailand.

Authors:  Kwaw S Andam; Paul J Ferraro; Katharine R E Sims; Andrew Healy; Margaret B Holland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Development and testing of a new framework for rapidly assessing legal and managerial protection afforded by marine protected areas: Mediterranean Sea case study.

Authors:  D Rodríguez-Rodríguez; J Rodríguez; D Abdul Malak
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  Conservation. Committing to ecological restoration.

Authors:  Katharine Suding; Eric Higgs; Margaret Palmer; J Baird Callicott; Christopher B Anderson; Matthew Baker; John J Gutrich; Kelly L Hondula; Matthew C LaFevor; Brendon M H Larson; Alan Randall; J B Ruhl; Katrina Z S Schwartz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Do parks work? Impact of protected areas on land cover clearing.

Authors:  Harini Nagendra
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Conditions associated with protected area success in conservation and poverty reduction.

Authors:  Paul J Ferraro; Merlin M Hanauer; Katharine R E Sims
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Socio-economic benefits from protected areas in southeastern Australia.

Authors:  E C Heagney; M Kovac; J Fountain; N Conner
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 6.560

7.  The challenge of implementing the European network of protected areas Natura 2000.

Authors:  Vassiliki Kati; Tasos Hovardas; Martin Dieterich; Pierre L Ibisch; Barbara Mihok; Nuria Selva
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  Protected area effectiveness against land development in Spain.

Authors:  David Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Javier Martínez-Vega
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 6.789

9.  A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas.

Authors:  J A Oldekop; G Holmes; W E Harris; K L Evans
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 6.560

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.