| Literature DB >> 30859375 |
Aleksandra Borowska-Solonynko1, Victoria Prokopowicz2, Dorota Samojłowicz2, Małgorzata Brzozowska2, Jarosław Żyłkowski3, Leszek Lombarski4.
Abstract
Due to their anatomical location, occipital condylar fractures (OCFs) are usually not observed during traditional autopsies and are therefore considered a rare injury. The aim of this study was to determine the true frequency of OCFs using post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) in traumatic casualties. We retrospectively analyzed 438 PMCT studies of victims of traffic accidents, falls from height, violence, and low-energy head injuries (324 males and 114 females). OCFs were present in 22.6% of cases (n = 99), mostly in victims of railway accidents (48.5%, n = 17), falls from height (26.6%, n = 29), cyclists (24%, n = 6), and pedestrians hit by cars (22.5%, n = 29). Isolated OCFs were found in 5.5% of cases (n = 24), most often in cyclists (12%, n = 3) and pedestrians (9.3%, n = 12) hit by cars. There were no OCFs in the cases of fatalities caused by violence or accidental low-energy head injury. PMCT scans revealed that OCFs are common in high-energy injury fatalities and can be useful for determining the mechanism of trauma more precisely.Entities:
Keywords: Death scene reconstruction; High-energy mechanical injuries; Occipital condylar fractures; Postmortem computed tomography
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30859375 PMCID: PMC6505491 DOI: 10.1007/s12024-019-00104-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Forensic Sci Med Pathol ISSN: 1547-769X Impact factor: 2.007
Occipital condylar fractures (OCFs) in relation to victim’s sex
| Victim’s sex | OCF not present | OCF present | Final sum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other type OCF | Isolated OCF | |||
| Femal | 83 (72,8%) | 20 (17,54%) | 11 (9,65%) | 114 |
| Male | 249 (78,5%) | 55 (17,35%) | 13 (4,1%) | 317 |
| Final sum | 332 | 75 | 24 | 431 |
Occipital condylar fractures (OCFs) in relation to victim’s mechanism of death
| Mechanism of death | OCF not present | OCF present | Final sum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other type OCF | Isolated OCF | |||
| Other | 8 (100%) | 8 | ||
| Motor vehicle accident – driver | 42 (85,71%) | 5 (10.2%) | 2 (4,08%) | 49 |
| Motor vehicle accident – motorcyclist | 23 (76,7%) | 6 (20%) | 1 (3,33%) | 30 |
| Motor vehicle accident – passenger | 28 (87,5%) | 4 (12,5%) | 32 | |
| Pedestrian hit by car | 100 (77,52%) | 17 (13,18%) | 12 (9,3%) | 129 |
| Violences | 14 (100%) | 14 | ||
| Cyclist hit by car | 19 (76%) | 3 (12%) | 3 (12%) | 25 |
| Fall from height | 80 (73,39%) | 25 (22,93%) | 4 (3,67%) | 109 |
| Railway accident | 18 (51,43%) | 15 (42,86%) | 2 (5,71%) | 35 |
| Final sum | 332 | 75 | 24 | 431 |
Fig. 1Postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) images showing isolated occipital condylar fractures (OCFs). a – type I OCF, b – type III OCF
Fig. 2Age distribution of people with isolated occipital condylar fractures (OCFs)
Side of isolated occipital condylar fractures (OCFs) in relation to the lateralization of head injuries
| Isolated OCF | Dominant head injuries | Final sum | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left | Both sides | Right | ||
| Left | 5 (55,66%) | 2 (66,67%) | 7 (77,78%) | 14 |
| Both sides | 1 (33,33%) | 1 | ||
| Right | 4 (44,44%) | 2 (22,22%) | 6 | |
| Final sum | 9 | 3 | 9 | 21 |