Freddie H Fu1, Stephen J Rabuck1, Robin V West2,3, Scott Tashman4, James J Irrgang1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, USA. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA. 4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The quadriceps tendon is a versatile graft option, and the clinical implications of a quadriceps tendon harvest need to be further defined. PURPOSE: To review surgical considerations for the safe harvest of a quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, with a focus on the risk of patellar fractures. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A series of 57 patients underwent ACL reconstruction with a quadriceps tendon autograft with a patellar bone block from March 2011 to December 2012 at a single institution. Patients who sustained a patellar fracture were identified. The clinical course for each patient was reviewed with International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form scores through 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: The incidence of patellar fractures was 3.5% intraoperatively and 8.8% at 2 years. This included 2 intraoperative fractures, 1 fracture during strength testing, and 2 occult fractures detected on computed tomography (CT) performed 6 months postoperatively for research purposes in asymptomatic participants. For the 5 patients with a patellar fracture with 24-month follow-up, the IKDC scores were 91.95, 91.95, 100.00, 100.00, and 64.37. CONCLUSION: Careful consideration of the quadriceps tendon and patellar anatomy is needed to safely harvest the bone plug from the superior pole of the patella. The consequences of a quadriceps tendon autograft harvest, specifically with regard to the risks associated with fractures of the patella during the harvest, demand full consideration. Postoperative imaging with CT may identify abnormalities in patients who are otherwise asymptomatic.
BACKGROUND: The quadriceps tendon is a versatile graft option, and the clinical implications of a quadriceps tendon harvest need to be further defined. PURPOSE: To review surgical considerations for the safe harvest of a quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, with a focus on the risk of patellar fractures. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A series of 57 patients underwent ACL reconstruction with a quadriceps tendon autograft with a patellar bone block from March 2011 to December 2012 at a single institution. Patients who sustained a patellar fracture were identified. The clinical course for each patient was reviewed with International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form scores through 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: The incidence of patellar fractures was 3.5% intraoperatively and 8.8% at 2 years. This included 2 intraoperative fractures, 1 fracture during strength testing, and 2 occult fractures detected on computed tomography (CT) performed 6 months postoperatively for research purposes in asymptomatic participants. For the 5 patients with a patellar fracture with 24-month follow-up, the IKDC scores were 91.95, 91.95, 100.00, 100.00, and 64.37. CONCLUSION: Careful consideration of the quadriceps tendon and patellar anatomy is needed to safely harvest the bone plug from the superior pole of the patella. The consequences of a quadriceps tendon autograft harvest, specifically with regard to the risks associated with fractures of the patella during the harvest, demand full consideration. Postoperative imaging with CT may identify abnormalities in patients who are otherwise asymptomatic.
An autogenous quadriceps tendon is a versatile graft option for anterior cruciate
ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Since Blauth[2] first described the quadriceps tendon as a graft for ACL reconstruction, various
modifications to the technique have been described that demonstrate this graft’s
versatility to address the unique needs of each case. Initial descriptions of the use of
the quadriceps tendon for ACL reconstruction included the harvest of a bone block from
the superior pole of the patella[2,6,13,17]; however, subsequent publications of the quadriceps tendon harvest describe a
graft consisting of soft tissue alone. This graft may be used for single-bundle or
double-bundle ACL reconstruction and is also an option for revision ACL reconstruction.[2,15]The quadriceps tendon is formed by the confluence of the anterior thigh musculature. The
central third of this tendon consists primarily of fibers from the rectus femoris and
vastus intermedius, resulting in a natural plane, which may be utilized to separate the
quadriceps tendon into 2 separate tendons for double-bundle ACL reconstruction.
Additionally, imaging studies have demonstrated that the quadriceps tendon thickness
doubles that of the patellar tendon.[22] Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has demonstrated that a quadriceps tendon length
of 7 to 8 cm can be consistently obtained, providing an adequate graft length for ACL reconstruction.[22]Further studies of biomechanical properties and clinical outcomes are favorable to other
autograft options. The biomechanical properties are similar to patellar tendon grafts
and are capable of exceeding the properties of the native ACL.[7,8,18] Clinical studies comparing quadriceps tendon grafts with patellar tendon grafts
have shown biomechanical advantages and favorable clinical outcomes, including a lower
incidence of anterior knee pain.[10-12,16-19] The objective of this case series was to review surgical considerations for the
safe harvest of a quadriceps tendon autograft for use during ACL reconstruction, with a
special focus on the risk of patellar fractures.
Methods
Patient Selection
This study involved a series of 57 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with a
quadriceps tendon autograft at our institution from March 2011 through December
2012. These patients were enrolled as participants in a separate randomized
clinical trial, funded by the National Institute of Arthritis and
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), to compare single-bundle versus
double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Inclusion criteria for this study required age
14 to 50 years, with a rupture of both bundles of the ACL, scheduled ACL
reconstruction within 1 year of injury, participation in level 1 (eg, football,
basketball, soccer) or level 2 (eg, racquet sports, skiing, manual labor)
activities for more than 100 hours per year, willingness to participate in
follow-up regardless of relocation, tibial and femoral insertion sites measuring
14 to 18 mm, and a notch width at least 12 mm as measured at the time of
surgery. Patients were excluded from participation if there was a history of
surgery on the involved or uninvolved knee, open physes, greater than grade 1
concomitant ligament knee injuries, full-thickness articular cartilage injuries,
degenerative changes of the quadriceps tendon on MRI or a measurement less than
7 mm thick, inflammatory arthritis, injuries preventing participation in level 1
or level 2 activities, or plans to become pregnant within the 2-year follow-up
period. Before participation in the clinical trial, all patients signed an
informed consent form approved by the institutional review board at our
institution. Postoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were obtained
at the initial postoperative visit as the standard of care. Helical computed
tomography (CT) with a 1.25-mm slice thickness was performed 6 months after
surgery as part of the research protocol to create bone and cartilage models
that were necessary for the accurate assessment of knee kinematics and joint
contact mechanics.
Surgical Technique
Patients were positioned supine in an arthroscopic leg holder. A longitudinal
incision was made following the central axis of the tendon to a point 1 cm
distal to the superior pole of the patella with the knee flexed. Hemostasis was
obtained during exposure to maintain optimal visualization during the graft
harvest. Skin flaps were developed to expose the full extent of the quadriceps
tendon to the superior pole of the patella. The central fibers were followed to
the insertion on the superior pole of the patella. A 10 mm–wide segment of the
central quadriceps tendon was incised with a No. 10 blade to a depth of 7 to 8
mm.A bone block measuring 18 to 20 mm long by 10 mm wide was harvested. The
longitudinal incisions from the central quadriceps tendon were extended over the
anterior patella to produce a planned 10 mm–wide bone block. An oscillating saw
was utilized to create longitudinal and transverse cuts no deeper than 8 to 10
mm in the superior pole of the patella. The bone block was then freed from the
superior pole of the patella with a quarter-inch osteotome. The tendon was
released proximally at least 6 cm proximal to the superior pole of the patella.
Routine bone grafting of the patellar defect was not performed.
Results
The cohort consisted of 57 patients with advanced imaging at 6 months
postoperatively. Two intraoperative fractures were identified (3.5%). Two additional
fractures were identified on advanced imaging as part of the research protocol, and
1 fracture occurred during strength testing 6 months after surgery. Over the full
duration of the study, a patellar fracture occurred in 5 of the 57 (8.8%) patients
who met the study eligibility criteria.Data at 24-month follow-up were available for 51 patients (89.5%). The 24-month
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form scores for
the 5 patients with a patellar fracture were 91.95, 91.95, 100.00, 100.00, and 64.37
(mean, 89.66 ± 14.70 [range, 64.37-100.00]). For the remaining 46 patients without a
patellar fracture the mean IKDC score at 24-month follow-up was 89.81 ± 10.29
(range, 55.17-100.00). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test between the groups resulted in a
P value of .56.A review of this cohort provided information to establish criteria to identify
patients at risk for patellar fractures (Table 1). The following is a case-by-case
summary of the 5 patients who sustained a patellar fracture after ACL reconstruction
with a quadriceps tendon autograft with a bone block harvested from the superior
pole of the patella.
TABLE 1
Potential Risk Factors for a Patellar Fracture After Quadriceps Tendon
Harvest
Eccentric harvest site (medial or lateral)
Harvest >50% of anteroposterior thickness
Harvest >50% of mediolateral width
Failure of bone graft to incorporate
Stress riser at corner of graft harvest site
Potential Risk Factors for a Patellar Fracture After Quadriceps Tendon
HarvestEccentric harvest site (medial or lateral)Harvest >50% of anteroposterior thicknessHarvest >50% of mediolateral widthFailure of bone graft to incorporateStress riser at corner of graft harvest site
Patient 1
A 24-year-old male patient underwent ACL reconstruction in June 2011 with a
quadriceps tendon autograft with a bone block measuring 18 mm long by 11 mm
wide. Postoperative radiographs demonstrated no fracture, and the patient
progressed through postoperative rehabilitation without incidence. He returned
to full activities 6 months after surgery. CT was performed at 6 months as part
of research procedures and demonstrated a subacute, nondisplaced fracture (Figure 1). The patient had
no clinical sequelae and returned to full activities. Eighteen months after ACL
reconstruction, he sustained a direct impact to the knee and noted tenderness
and swelling. On examination, he had no effusion and a strong quadriceps
contraction and could perform straight-leg raises without a lag. He was mildly
tender at the quadriceps tendon insertion. Follow-up imaging including plain
radiographs and MRI demonstrated healing of the prior fracture, unchanged from
imaging performed at 6-month follow-up. Strength testing 24 months after surgery
revealed no pain or objective weakness. The patient’s IKDC score at that time
was 91.95, and he had returned to full activities.
Figure 1.
Computed tomography scan of patient 1 demonstrating an occult fracture at
6-month follow-up.
Computed tomography scan of patient 1 demonstrating an occult fracture at
6-month follow-up.
Patient 2
Patient 2 was an 18-year-old male football player who sustained a noncontact knee
injury. He underwent ACL reconstruction in August 2011 with a quadriceps tendon
autograft with a bone plug that measured 20 mm long and 10 mm wide. He
progressed through postoperative rehabilitation uneventfully. Routine
postoperative CT was performed as per the study protocol 6 months after ACL
reconstruction. CT demonstrated prominent bony overgrowth of the lateral patella
at the vastus lateralis insertion, representing heterotopic ossification or a
periosteal reaction at an occult fracture site. Follow-up radiographs
demonstrated ossification at the lateral insertion of the quadriceps tendon on
the patella. He noted occasional knee pain. His patella was nontender with
symmetric mobility. He has returned to playing competitive football without
functional limitations. At the 24-month research visit, his IKDC score was
91.95.
Patient 3
Patient 3 was a 17-year-old male football and volleyball player who injured his
left knee after a contact injury during a football game. He underwent ACL
reconstruction with a quadriceps tendon autograft with a 20-mm by 11-mm bone
block in October 2011. He progressed well through his postoperative
rehabilitation. Six months after surgery, he was preparing to return to sport
activities and underwent isometric strength testing with a Biodex isokinetic
dynamometer with the knee flexed to 75° to determine his readiness for return to
sports. During a maximal isometric contraction of the quadriceps, the patient
felt a pop, and pain was experienced anteriorly over the patella. Imaging
demonstrated an oblique, nondisplaced patellar fracture of the superior pole of
the patella (Figure 2).
The fracture was treated nonoperatively with immobilization in full extension
for 8 weeks and went on to heal clinically and radiographically. He returned to
full participation in football and volleyball in August 2012. At the 24-month
study visit, his IKDC score was 100.00.
Figure 2.
(A) Computed tomography scan and (B) anteroposterior and (C) lateral
radiographs of patient 3 after strength testing at 6-month
follow-up.
(A) Computed tomography scan and (B) anteroposterior and (C) lateral
radiographs of patient 3 after strength testing at 6-month
follow-up.
Patient 4
Patient 4 was a 25-year-old man who sustained a complete rupture of his ACL after
a noncontact injury to his right knee while playing soccer. He underwent ACL
reconstruction in November 2011 with a quadriceps tendon autograft including a
bone block measuring 20 mm long by 10 mm wide. Intraoperatively, no fracture was
apparent. At his first follow-up visit, postoperative anteroposterior and
lateral radiographs were obtained and revealed a nondisplaced fracture at the
donor site within the superior pole of the patella (Figure 3). The fracture was treated
nonoperatively, with immobilization in full extension for 4 weeks, at which time
there was no displacement of the fracture. Range of motion was limited for an
additional 2 weeks. The fracture showed radiographic healing at the 6-month
follow-up visit. At 8 months postoperatively, the patient had no symptoms and
had returned to full activities, participating in recreational sports without
issue. At the 24-month research visit, the patient’s IKDC score was 100.00.
Figure 3.
(A) Anteroposterior and (B) lateral radiographs of patient 4 after
strength testing at 6-month follow-up.
(A) Anteroposterior and (B) lateral radiographs of patient 4 after
strength testing at 6-month follow-up.
Patient 5
A 17-year-old female patient sustained a noncontact injury in her left knee while
playing softball. ACL reconstruction of the left knee was performed in June
2012, during which a 10 mm–wide by 20 mm–long bone block was harvested. A
nondisplaced fracture was identified as the bone plug was freed from the
superior pole of the patella; the fracture line extended to the lateral cortex
of the patella. The quadriceps tendon was released from its insertion on the
bone block/superior pole of the patella, and the soft tissue graft was utilized
for ACL reconstruction. The bone block remained in situ and was fixed using a
standard fracture management technique using two 3.0-mm screws in a
lateral-to-medial direction (Figure 4). Postoperatively, the patient’s brace was locked in
extension for 2 weeks, and flexion was limited until 6 weeks, at which point
unrestricted motion was allowed. She achieved full range of motion by 3 months
postoperatively, with clinical and radiographic signs of healing of her patellar
fracture. At 24-month follow-up, she had discomfort with standing for prolonged
periods of time at work. She did not require the removal of hardware. Her IKDC
score at the 24-month research visit was 64.37.
Figure 4.
(A) Anteroposterior and (B) lateral radiographs of patient 5 after
fixation of a patellar fracture.
(A) Anteroposterior and (B) lateral radiographs of patient 5 after
fixation of a patellar fracture.
Discussion
In this series of 57 patients who were recruited to participate in a NIAMS-funded
clinical trial, the incidence of intraoperative patellar fractures was 3.5%.
Three-dimensional CT and MRI were performed at 6 months as part of the research
protocol. Over the duration of the study, the incidence of patellar fractures
increased to 8.8%. By including 3-dimensional imaging in the postoperative
evaluation, we were able to obtain an increased sensitivity for detecting the
consequences of harvesting a patellar bone block for a quadriceps tendon graft that
otherwise would have not been detected. Two of the 5 fractures identified in this
cohort were only identified by the 3-dimensional CT imaging. These patients were
asymptomatic and did not require modification of their postoperative rehabilitation.
The 24-month IKDC scores for both of these patients were 91.95, while the mean IKDC
score for patients without a fracture was 89.81. However, these fractures require
consideration for further studies examining a quadriceps tendon autograft with a
bone block.Lee et al[11] reported the outcomes of the harvest of a quadriceps tendon with a bone block
in a cohort of 247 patients with a minimum 24-month follow-up. A 10 mm–wide bone
block was harvested for all patients. Three patients in their cohort had a patellar
fracture involving the donor site for the graft harvest. One patient developed a
longitudinal, nondisplaced patellar fracture after a fall on the operative knee 5
months after surgery and was treated nonoperatively. Two fractures occurred
intraoperatively and were treated by internal fixation with 4.0-mm cannulated
screws. The postoperative rehabilitation was not modified for these patients.
Three-dimensional imaging was not routinely performed for all patients within this
cohort to evaluate for complications related to the patellar donor site.[4] Cross-sectional imaging may have identified occult fractures in asymptomatic
patients, as was demonstrated in the present study.The utilization of the quadriceps tendon as an autograft for ACL reconstruction has
gained attention recently. A recent systematic review demonstrated similar clinical
outcomes for the Lachman and pivot-shift tests between the quadriceps tendon and
more commonly used graft options.[14] The risks associated with the quadriceps tendon graft harvest have not been
as clearly outlined as for other graft options for ACL reconstruction. Numerous
outcome studies exist on ACL reconstruction with hamstring and patellar tendon
autografts, allowing surgeons to better understand the potential risks associated
with these graft options.The incidence of patellar fractures has been more extensively studied after the
harvest of a bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft. The reported risk of patellar
fractures after the harvest of this type of graft ranges from 0.2% to 1.8%.[3,21] Most studies examining fractures after the patellar tendon autograft harvest
include larger cohorts than those reported for quadriceps tendon autografts.In 2008, Lee et al[9] reported on 1725 patellar tendon harvests with a disruption of the extensor
mechanism in 3 patients. Stein et al[20] reported on a cohort of 618 patients undergoing a patellar tendon graft
harvest with a 1.3% incidence rate of patellar fractures. A mean follow-up of 4
years in patients with a patellar fracture showed a mean Lysholm score of 89.6.[20] These studies, however, did not perform routine cross-sectional imaging and
may not have identified asymptomatic fractures.During the graft harvest within the current study group, a uniform graft was obtained
to minimize variation among patients enrolled in the clinical trial. A standardized
graft measuring 10 to 11 mm in diameter with a bone plug 18 to 20 mm in length was
used for all patients. Additionally, the location of the graft harvest was
determined by the insertion of the central fibers of the quadriceps tendon.
Fulkerson and Langeland[6] recently demonstrated that the central fibers of the quadriceps tendon insert
eccentrically on the patella. This insertion is most commonly in a lateral position.[6] Care to harvest the bone block from a central position is necessary, as a
bone block positioned too medially or, more commonly, too laterally may lead to an
insufficient bone bridge and increases the risk of fractures. Additionally, the
depth of the patellar harvest site may influence the risk of fractures. The patella
has a nonuniform geometry, and a bone block harvest should be individualized to the
patient’s anatomy. Computerized modeling has demonstrated that a lateral harvest
site and depth greater than 30% of the patella result in a diminished bone bridge
that may be associated with an increased risk of patellar fractures.[5]Bone grafting the patellar defect may provide clinical benefits to improve patient
outcomes. Akoto and Hoeher[1] reported on a series of 30 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with bone
grafting of the patellar defect from a quadriceps autograft. This series reported
good functional outcomes at 1-year follow-up. Bone grafting the patellar defect may
improve patient outcomes after an autograft harvest and reduce the incidence of late
fractures in these patients.A review of the patients involved in this study aimed to identify risk factors for a
patellar fracture after the harvest of a patellar bone block (see Table 1). In this cohort,
patellar fractures occurred in those with a harvest of the bone plug from the
lateral portion of the patella and in those in which the depth of the harvest was
greater than 50% of the depth of the patella. In addition to the 5 patients who had
a patellar fracture, a review of postoperative radiographs and CT and MRI scans
obtained for research purposes 6 months after surgery revealed that an additional 5
patients had a harvest of a bone plug that was greater than 50% of the thickness of
the patella or too lateral. These findings were only detectable by CT. None of these
patients have suffered a patellar fracture or have limitations due to patellar
symptoms.After a review of patients enrolled in the study, modifications to the graft harvest
were introduced to minimize the risk of fractures (Table 2). These modifications included
harvesting the bone plug from the central region of the superior pole of the
patella, bone grafting the patellar defect, and limiting the depth of the bone
harvest to less than 50% of the patellar depth, with a shorter bone plug length
(less than 50% of the length of the patella). Longitudinal cuts were angled
centrally to produce a trapezoidal bone block with less deep cancellous bone
removal. Finally, the bone graft obtained from the tibial tunnel was used to fill
the patellar defect. Recent studies have demonstrated that thinner bone bridges are
associated with an increased risk of fractures, and these modifications assist in
maximizing the bone bridge at the harvest site.[5]
TABLE 2
Modifications to Bone Block Harvest to Reduce the Risk of Fractures
Centralized location of bone graft harvest
Bone graft defect within superior pole of patella
Depth of cut <50% of patellar thickness
Length of bone block <50% of patellar length
Creation of trapezoidal bone block that is wider
anteriorly than posteriorly
Modifications to Bone Block Harvest to Reduce the Risk of FracturesCentralized location of bone graft harvestBone graft defect within superior pole of patellaDepth of cut <50% of patellar thicknessLength of bone block <50% of patellar lengthCreation of trapezoidal bone block that is wider
anteriorly than posteriorlySince making the modifications to the procedures for the harvest of the patellar bone
block, we have continued to selectively perform ACL reconstruction using a
quadriceps tendon graft with a patellar bone plug when the soft tissue length of the
graft is less than 7 cm. The harvest of a quadriceps tendon autograft with a bone
block has been performed on an additional 40 patients, and no further patellar
fractures have occurred.The presented data are subject to some important limitations. Specifically, the data
presented are relevant to a case series and subject to all limitations inherent in
this study design. This study included patients from a randomized controlled trial.
All patients from that cohort were included regardless of symptoms or the presence
of a patellar fracture. Patients in a randomized controlled trial may not generalize
to clinical practice. Further limitations of this study include a relatively small
sample size of 57 patients.
Conclusion
The quadriceps tendon is a versatile graft for utilization in ACL reconstruction. The
biomechanical properties may be superior to more common autograft options and
approximate those of the native ACL. A patellar fracture occurred in 8.8% of
patients with a quadriceps tendon autograft with a bone block in this study. Two of
5 fractures were identified intraoperatively. Late, nondisplaced fractures can be
treated nonoperatively. Precautions need to be taken to minimize the risk of
patellar fractures. In patients who experience a patellar fracture after a bone
block harvest, clinical outcomes are not significantly different from patients
without a fracture at 2-year follow-up. Postoperative imaging with CT may identify
abnormalities in patients who are otherwise asymptomatic. Further studies are
necessary to elucidate clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with a quadriceps
tendon autograft.
Authors: Sahnghoon Lee; Sang Cheol Seong; Chris Hyunchul Jo; Hyuk Soo Han; Joon Hwan An; Myung Chul Lee Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Jonathan S Mulford; Stephen E Hutchinson; Jacqueline R Hang Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Gregory H Lee; Patrick McCulloch; Brian J Cole; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Bernard R Bach Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2007-12-31 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Christopher P Emerson; Jessica M Bernstein; Fong Nham; Spencer Barnhill; Michael G Baraga; Eric Bogner; Jean Jose Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2019-05-16 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Marc Strauss; Mitchell L Kennedy; Alex Brady; Gilbert Moatshe; Jorge Chahla; Robert F LaPrade; Martin Lind; Lars Engebretsen Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2021-09-14
Authors: Raphael J Crum; Jeffrey Kay; Bryson P Lesniak; Alan Getgood; Volker Musahl; Darren de Sa Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Jose R Perez; Christopher P Emerson; Carlos M Barrera; Dylan N Greif; William H Cade; Lee D Kaplan; Michael G Baraga Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2019-12-17