Literature DB >> 30858160

Commutability of a Whole-Blood External Quality Assessment Material for Point-of-Care C-Reactive Protein, Glucose, and Hemoglobin Testing.

Tone Bukve1, Sverre Sandberg2,3,4, Wenche S Vie2, Una Sølvik3, Nina G Christensen2, Anne Stavelin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal situation in external quality assessment (EQA) is to use commutable materials. No previous study has examined the commutability of a whole-blood material for point-of-care (POC) testing. The aim of this study was to determine the commutability of the Norwegian Quality Improvement of Laboratory Examinations (Noklus) organization's "in-house" whole-blood EQA material for C-reactive protein (CRP), glucose, and hemoglobin for frequently used POC instruments in Norway and to determine the possibility of using a common target value for each analyte.
METHODS: The study was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The EQA material was pooled stabilized EDTA venous whole-blood containing different concentrations of the analytes. The EQA material and native routine patient samples were analyzed using 17 POC and 3 hospital instruments. The commutability was assessed using Deming regression analysis with 95% prediction intervals for each instrument comparison.
RESULTS: The EQA material was commutable for all CRP and hemoglobin POC instruments, whereas for glucose the material was commutable for all POC instruments at the lowest concentration analyzed [126.0 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L)] and for 3 POC instruments at all of the concentrations analyzed.
CONCLUSIONS: Noklus EQA participants using CRP and hemoglobin POC instruments now receive results that are compared with a reference target value, whereas the results for participants using glucose POC instruments are still compared with method-specific target values. Systematic deviations from a reference target value for the commutable glucose POC instruments can be calculated, and this additional information can now be offered to these participants and to the manufacturers.
© 2019 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30858160     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2018.300202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  2 in total

1.  Impact of Two Different Reference Measurement Procedures on Apparent System Accuracy of 18 CE-Marked Current-Generation Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Annette Baumstark; Nina Jendrike; Jochen Mende; Sebastian Schauer; Manuela Link; Stefan Pleus; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-19

2.  Commutability of external quality assessment materials for point-of-care glucose testing using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and International Federation of Clinical Chemistry approaches.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Mario Plebani; Laura Sciacovelli; Shunli Zhang; Qingtao Wang; Rui Zhou
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 2.352

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.