Literature DB >> 30857933

Simulated vaccine efficacy trials to estimate HIV incidence for actual vaccine clinical trials in key populations in Uganda.

Andrew Abaasa1, Stephen Nash2, Yunia Mayanja3, Matt Price4, Patricia E Fast5, Anatoli Kamali6, Pontiano Kaleebu3, Jim Todd2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fisherfolks (FF) and female sex workers (FSW) in Uganda could be suitable key populations for HIV vaccine efficacy trials because of the high HIV incidence and good retention in observational cohorts. However, the observed HIV incidence may differ in participants who enroll into a trial. We used simulated vaccine efficacy trials (SiVET) nested within observational cohorts in these populations to evaluate this difference.
METHODS: SiVETs were nested in two observational cohorts (Jul 2012-Apr 2014 in FF and Aug 2014-Apr 2017 in FSW). From Jan 2012 all observational cohort participants (aged 18-49 years) presenting for quarterly visits were screened for enrolment into SiVETs, until 572 were enrolled. Those not enrolled (screened-out or not screened) in SiVET continued participation in the observational cohorts. In addition to procedures in the observational cohorts (HIV testing & risk assessment), SiVET participants were given a licensed Hepatitis B vaccine mimicking a schedule of a possible HIV vaccine, and followed-up for 12 months.
FINDINGS: In total, 3989 participants were enrolled into observational cohorts (1575 FF prior to Jul 2012 and 2414 FSW prior to Aug 2014). Of these 3622 (90.8%) returned at least once, 672 (44.1%) were screened and 572 enrolled in the SiVETs. HIV incidence pre SIVETs was 4.5/100 person years-at-risk (pyar), 95%CI (3.8-5.5). HIV incidence in SiVET was 3.5/100 pyar, (2.2-5.6) and higher in those not enrolled in the SiVET, 5.9/100 pyar, (4.3-8.1). This difference was greatest among FF. In the 12 months post-SIVET period (FF, May 2014-Apr 2015 and FSW, May 2017-Apr 2018), the HIV incidence was 3.7/100 pyar, (2.5-5.8).
INTERPRETATION: HIV incidence was lower in SiVET participants compared to non-SiVET. This difference was different for the two populations. Researchers designing HIV efficacy trials using observational cohort data need to consider the potential for lower than expected HIV incidence following screening and enrolment.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIV-incidence vaccine trials key-populations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30857933     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of retention in observational cohorts and nested simulated HIV vaccine efficacy trials in the key populations in Uganda.

Authors:  Andrew Abaasa; Jim Todd; Stephen Nash; Yunia Mayanja; Pontiano Kaleebu; Patricia E Fast; Matt Price
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Use of propensity score matching to create counterfactual group to assess potential HIV prevention interventions.

Authors:  Andrew Abaasa; Yunia Mayanja; Gershim Asiki; Matt A Price; Patricia E Fast; Eugene Ruzagira; Pontiano Kaleebu; Jim Todd
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Willingness to participate in future HIV vaccine trials among men who have sex with men and female sex workers living in Nairobi, Kenya.

Authors:  Elizabeth Mueni Mutisya; Gaudensia Mutua; Delvin Nyasani; Hannah Nduta; Rhoda W Kabuti; Vincent Muturi-Kioi; Gloria Omosa-Manyonyi; Andrew Abaasa; Krysia Lindan; Matt A Price; Joshua Kimani; Aggrey Omu Anzala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.