Literature DB >> 30857899

Return to Dance and Predictors of Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

Gift C Ukwuani1, Brian R Waterman2, Benedict U Nwachukwu3, Edward C Beck1, Kyle N Kunze1, Joshua D Harris4, Shane J Nho5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the rate of return to dance and factors influencing this primary outcome after hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.
METHODS: A consecutive series of self-identified dancers with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome was included. To assess for the impact of hypermobility on outcomes, patients were classified as having either generalized joint laxity (GJL) or no GJL based on the Beighton-Horan Joint Mobility Index. A return-to-dance survey, the modified Harris Hip Score, and the Hip Outcome Score (HOS)-Activities of Daily Living and HOS-Sports-Specific subscales were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. The preoperative-to-postoperative outcome score change was compared using the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptomatic state. Return to dance was evaluated regarding (1) return to any dance activity, (2) return to prior level of dance, and (3) number of hours of dance participation after surgery. Clinical and demographic predictors and return to dance were analyzed using univariate or bivariate analysis where appropriate.
RESULTS: The study included 64 consecutive dancers (62 female and 2 male patients) (mean age, 22.3 ± 9.4 years; body mass index, 22.8 ± 4.1) with a mean follow-up period of 23.0 months. Postoperatively, 62 patients (97%) returned to dance at an average of 6.9 ± 2.9 months; 40 patients (62.5%) reported that they returned to a better level of participation, whereas 20 dancers (31%) returned to the same level of participation. Statistically significant increases were observed for the HOS-Activities of Daily Living subscale (60.5 ± 19.5 vs 92.4 ± 11.8, P < .001), HOS-Sports-Specific subscale (40.3 ± 20.3 vs 83.5 ± 19.4, P < .001), and modified Harris Hip Score (57.0 ± 13.6 vs 86.6 ± 13.9, P < .001). There was, however, a significant decrease in the number of hours of dance postoperatively: 11.5 ± 8.2 h/wk preoperatively versus 9.0 ± 7.3 h/wk postoperatively (P = .041). All postoperative hip outcome measures showed statistically significant (P < .001) and clinically relevant improvements. Patient-reported outcomes and return time showed no significant differences between the patient groups with GJL and without GJL (P = .1 and P = .489, respectively). For competitive dancers, a correlation was shown with a shorter time to return to dance (r2 = 0.45, P = .001), but there were no significant differences by skill level in patient-reported outcomes or dance hours.
CONCLUSIONS: After hip arthroscopy, 97% of dancers returned to dance at an average of 6.9 months, with most dancers dancing at a level higher than their preoperative status. Dance experience level was the only significant factor influencing return-to-dance outcomes, with competitive dancers showing a faster return to dancing.conclusion LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Copyright © 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30857899     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  7 in total

Review 1.  Improvement in pain and patient-related outcome measures following hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and concomitant generalized ligamentous laxity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Xi Ming Zhu; Asra Toobaie; Alla Iansavichene; Moin Khan; Ryan M Degen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.114

Review 2.  Reporting Clinical Significance in Hip Arthroscopy: Where Are We Now?

Authors:  Breanna A Polascik; Jeffrey Peck; Nicholas Cepeda; Stephen Lyman; Daphne Ling
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-04-12

Review 3.  Hypermobile Disorders and Their Effects on the Hip Joint.

Authors:  Ian M Clapp; Katlynn M Paul; Edward C Beck; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-03-25

Review 4.  Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Beighton Score: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lauren N Bockhorn; Angelina M Vera; David Dong; Domenica A Delgado; Kevin E Varner; Joshua D Harris
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-20

5.  Endoscopic Shelf Acetabuloplasty Concomitant With Labral Repair, Cam Osteoplasty, and Capsular Plication to Treat Acetabular Dysplasia in Artistic Athletes: A Case Series.

Authors:  Soshi Uchida; Yoichi Murata; Manabu Tsukamoto; Hajime Utsunomiya; Yoshiaki Yamanaka; Akihisa Hatakeyama; Shiho Kanezaki; Akinori Sakai
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-11-01

6.  Femoroacetabular translation in female athletes and dancers assessed by dynamic hip ultrasonography.

Authors:  Charles P Scott; Pierre A d'Hemecourt; Patricia E Miller; Dai Sugimoto; Sarah S Jackson; Greggory P Kobelski; Kristin E Whitney; Andrea Stracciolini
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2021-12-17

Review 7.  Understanding hip pathology in ballet dancers.

Authors:  Yash Singh; Matthew Pettit; Osama El-Hakeem; Rachel Elwood; Alan Norrish; Emmanuel Audenaert; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 4.114

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.