| Literature DB >> 30857304 |
Ana Filipa Silva1,2, Gabriel Faria-Costa3,4, Fábio Sousa-Nunes5,6, Manuel Filipe Santos7,8, Manuel João Ferreira-Pinto9,10, Delfim Duarte11, Ilda Rodrigues12, João Tiago Guimarães13,14,15, Adelino Leite-Moreira16,17, Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves18,19, Tiago Henriques-Coelho20,21, Rita Negrão22,23.
Abstract
Polyphenols present in some alcoholic beverages have been linked to beneficial effects in preventing cardiovascular diseases. Polyphenols found in beer with anti-proliferative and anti-cancer properties are appealing in the context of the quasi-malignant phenotype of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Our purpose was to evaluate if the chronic ingestion of a xanthohumol-fortified beer (FB) would be able to modulate the pathophysiology of experimental PAH. Male Wistar rats with monocrotaline (MCT)-induced PAH (60 mg/kg) were allowed to drink either xanthohumol-fortified beer (MCT + FB) or 5.2% ethanol (MCT + SHAM) for a period 4 weeks. At the end of the protocol, cardiopulmonary exercise testing and hemodynamic recordings were performed, followed by sample collection for further analysis. FB intake resulted in a significant attenuation of the pulmonary vascular remodeling in MCT + FB animals. This improvement was paralleled with the downregulation in expression of proteins responsible for proliferation (ERK1/2), cell viability (AKT), and apoptosis (BCL-XL). Moreover, MCT + FB animals presented improved right ventricle (RV) function and remodeling accompanied by VEGFR-2 pathway downregulation. The present study demonstrates that a regular consumption of xanthohumol through FB modulates major remodeling pathways activated in experimental PAH.Entities:
Keywords: beer; monocrotaline; polyphenol; pulmonary arterial hypertension; remodeling; xanthohumol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30857304 PMCID: PMC6472147 DOI: 10.3390/nu11030583
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Flow-chart of the experimental design. MCT: monocrotaline, ETOH: ethanol, FB: Xanthohumol-fortified beer.
Xanthohumol-fortified beer (FB) effects on general morphometric characteristics in healthy controls and monocrotaline (MCT) treated animals.
| Control | MCT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHAM | FB | SHAM | FB | |
| BW (kg) | 0.305 ± 0.0 | 0.305 ± 0.0 | 0.250 ± 0.0 ** | 0.260 ± 0.0 ** |
| HW (g) | 0.898 ± 0.0 | 0.861 ± 0.0 | 0.879 ± 0.0 | 0.863 ± 0.0 |
| HW/Tibia (g/mm) | 0.027 ± 0.0 | 0.025 ± 0.0 | 0.026 ± 0.0 | 0.025 ± 0.0 |
| RV (g) | 0.167 ± 0.0 | 0.165 ± 0.0 | 0.239 ± 0.0 * | 0.208 ± 0.0 |
| RV/Tibia (g/mm) | 0.005 ± 0.0 | 0.005 ± 0.0 | 0.007 ± 0.0 * | 0.006 ± 0.0 † |
| RV/LV+S (g/g) | 0.309 ± 0.1 | 0.287 ± 0.0 | 0.510 ± 0.1 * | 0.403 ± 0.0 *† |
| LV+S (g) | 0.586 ± 0.0 | 0.577 ± 0.0 | 0.491 ± 0.0 * | 0.481 ± 0.0 * |
| LV+S/Tibia (g/mm) | 0.017 ± 0.0 | 0.017 ± 0.0 | 0.015 ± 0.0 * | 0.014 ± 0.0 * |
| L (g) | 1.323 ± 0.1 | 1.323 ± 0.1 | 1.888 ± 0.1* | 1.603 ± 0.1 *† |
| L/Tibia (g/mm) | 0.042 ± 0.0 | 0.035 ± 0.0 | 0.056 ± 0.0 * | 0.046 ± 0.0 |
| Gast (g) | 1.921 ± 0.1 | 2.021 ± 0.1 | 1.554 ± 0.0 * | 1.587 ± 0.0 * |
| Gast/Tibia (g/mm) | 0.055 ± 0.0 | 0.056 ± 0.0 | 0.047 ± 0.0 * | 0.046 ± 0.0 * |
Data are mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05 vs. respective control group, ** p < 0.001 vs. respective control group, † p < 0.05 vs. MCT + SHAM. BW: body weight, HW: heart weight, RV: right ventricle weight, LV+S: left ventricle + septum weight, L: lung weight, Gast: Gastrocnemius weight, SHAM: Animal drinking 5.2% ethanol, FB: fortified beer.
Figure 2Xanthohumol-fortified beer (FB) ingestion effect on animal VO2max (a) time to exhaustion (b) and maximum speed that the animals reached on the test (c). Data are mean ± SEM of 6 animals per group. * p < 0.05 vs. respective control group, † p < 0.05 vs. MCT + SHAM. MCT: monocrotaline.
Figure 3Xanthohumol-fortified beer (FB) intake improved PAH animals pulmonary vascular remodeling. Microscopic analysis of the large (a) and small (b) intrapulmonary arteries. Representative images of arteries from the different experimental groups (c). Data are mean ± SEM from samples of 8 animals per group. * p < 0.05 vs. respective control group, † p < 0.05 vs. MCT + SHAM. MCT: monocrotaline.
Figure 4Xanthohumol-fortified beer (FB) effect on pulmonary expression of p-ERK1/2/ERK1/2 ratio (a) and p-AKT/AKT ratio (b) of healthy (control) or monocrotaline (MCT)-induced PAH animals. Data are mean ± SEM from 8 animals per group. * p < 0.05 vs. respective control group, † p < 0.05 vs. MCT + SHAM.
Figure 5Effect of Xanthohumol-fortified beer (FB) on lung apoptosis of healthy (Control) and monocrotaline (MCT)-induced PAH animals: (a) BCL-XL, (b) BAX, and (c) caspase-3. Data are mean ± SEM from samples of 8 animals per group. * p < 0.05 vs. respective control group, † p < 0.05 vs. MCT + SHAM.
Xanthohumol-fortified beer (FB) effect on right ventricular hemodynamic evaluation of healthy controls and monocrotaline (MCT)-induced PAH animals.
| Control | MCT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHAM | FB | SHAM | FB | |
| Pmax (mmHg) | 27.5 ± 1.5 | 29.6 ± 1.6 | 62.7 ± 5.5 * | 50.2 ± 3.9 *† |
| dP/dtmax (mmHg/s) | 1798 ± 222 | 1877 ± 190 | 3133 ± 358 * | 2578 ± 104 |
| EF (%) | 74.0 ± 1.6 | 69.9 ± 7.9 | 39.9 ± 3.6 * | 55.2 ± 6.0 |
| EDP(mmHg) | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.9 | 4.6 ± 0.7 * | 3.6 ± 0.4 |
| dP/dtmin (mmHg/s) | −1472 ± 84 | −1693 ± 174 | −3289 ± 528 * | −2671 ± 191 |
| Tau (ms) | 8.8 ± 0.8 | 8.9 ± 1.1 | 11.5 ± 1.4 | 9.4 ± 0.7 |
Data are mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05 vs. respective control group, † p < 0.05 vs. MCT + SHAM. Pmax: maximum pressure, dP/dtmax: peak rate of pressure rise, dP/dtmin: peak rate of pressure fall, EDP: end-diastolic pressure, EF: ejection fraction.
Figure 6Xanthohumol-fortified beer (FB) improved monocrotaline (MCT)-induced RV remodeling: (a) cardiomyocyte cross sectional area, (b) fibrosis (demonstrated by the % of collagen deposition), (d) VEGFR-2, and (e) p-ERK1/2/ERK1/2 ratio. Representative images from CSA and fibrosis from different experimental groups (c). Data are mean ± SEM from samples of eight animals per group. * p < 0.05 vs. respective control group, # p < 0.05 vs. Control + SHAM, † p < 0.05 vs. MCT + SHAM. RV: right ventricle, CSA: cross sectional area.
Figure 7Effect of xanthohumol-fortified beer (FB) on animal survival. The absence of survival curve in Control + SHAM means that all the animals survived until the end of the protocol; the curve is superimposed with Control + FB group. Kaplan–Meier survival curves of the experimental groups are represented according to the days after monocrotaline (MCT) injection. * p < 0.05 vs. respective control groups.