Literature DB >> 30856829

Efficacy of Various Fungal and Bacterial Biocontrol Organisms for Control of Fusarium Wilt of Tomato.

Robert P Larkin1, Deborah R Fravel1.   

Abstract

Numerous fungi and bacteria, including existing biocontrol strains with known activity against soilborne fungal pathogens as well as isolates collected from the roots and rhizosphere of tomato plants growing in the field, were tested for their efficacy in controlling Fusarium wilt of tomato. Tomato seedlings were treated with the potential biocontrol agents in the greenhouse and transplanted into pathogen-infested field soil. Organisms tested included nonpathogenic strains of Fusarium spp., Trichoderma spp., Gliocladium virens, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Burkholderia cepacia, and others. Specific nonpathogenic isolates of F. oxysporum and F. solani collected from a Fusarium wilt-suppressive soil were the most effective antagonists, providing significant and consistent disease control (50 to 80% reduction of disease incidence) in several repeated tests. These isolates also were equally effective in controlling Fusarium wilt diseases of other crops, including watermelon and muskmelon. Other organisms, including isolates of G. virens, T. hamatum, P. fluorescens, and B. cepacia, also significantly reduced Fusarium wilt compared to disease controls (30 to 65% reduction), but were not as consistently effective as the nonpathogenic Fusarium isolates. Commercially available biocontrol products containing G. virens and T. harzianum (SoilGard and RootShield, respectively) also effectively reduced disease (62 to 68% reduction) when granules were incorporated into potting medium at 0.2% (wt/vol). Several fungal and bacterial isolates collected from the roots and rhizosphere of tomato plants also significantly reduced Fusarium wilt of tomato, but were no more effective than other previously identified biocontrol strains. Combinations of antagonists, including multiple Fusarium isolates, Fusarium with bacteria, and Fusarium with other fungi, also reduced disease, but did not provide significantly better control than the nonpathogenic Fusarium antagonists alone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biological control

Year:  1998        PMID: 30856829     DOI: 10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.9.1022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Dis        ISSN: 0191-2917            Impact factor:   4.438


  14 in total

1.  Changes in Bacterial and Fungal Microbiomes Associated with Tomatoes of Healthy and Infected by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici.

Authors:  Xin Zhou; Jin-Ting Wang; Wei-Hua Wang; Clement Km Tsui; Lei Cai
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Overexpression of CaMYB78 transcription factor enhances resistance response in chickpea against Fusarium oxysporum and negatively regulates anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway.

Authors:  Surbhi Shriti; Sathi Paul; Sampa Das
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Novel in vitro methods for simultaneous screening of two antagonistic bacteria against multiple fungal phytopathogens in a single agar plate.

Authors:  N S Nysanth; S L Sivapriya; Chitra Natarajan; K N Anith
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 2.893

4.  Inhibition of multiple defense responsive pathways by CaWRKY70 transcription factor promotes susceptibility in chickpea under Fusarium oxysporum stress condition.

Authors:  Joydeep Chakraborty; Senjuti Sen; Prithwi Ghosh; Akansha Jain; Sampa Das
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 4.215

5.  Antifungal spectrum characterization and identification of strong volatile organic compounds produced by Bacillus pumilus TM-R.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Morita; Issei Tanaka; Noriko Ryuda; Masao Ikari; Daisuke Ueno; Takashi Someya
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-06-08

6.  Biocontrol and plant growth promoting potential of phylogenetically new Streptomyces sp. MR14 of rhizospheric origin.

Authors:  Talwinder Kaur; Riveka Rani; Rajesh Kumari Manhas
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 7.  Rural Subsistence Maize Farming in South Africa: Risk Assessment and Intervention models for Reduction of Exposure to Fumonisin Mycotoxins.

Authors:  Johanna Alberts; John Rheeder; Wentzel Gelderblom; Gordon Shephard; Hester-Mari Burger
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 4.546

8.  Deciphering microbial diversity associated with Fusarium wilt-diseased and disease-free banana rhizosphere soil.

Authors:  Dengbo Zhou; Tao Jing; Yufeng Chen; Fei Wang; Dengfeng Qi; Renjun Feng; Jianghui Xie; Huaping Li
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  Linking Comparative Genomics of Nine Potato-Associated Pseudomonas Isolates With Their Differing Biocontrol Potential Against Late Blight.

Authors:  Mout De Vrieze; Adithi R Varadarajan; Kerstin Schneeberger; Aurélien Bailly; Rudolf P Rohr; Christian H Ahrens; Laure Weisskopf
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Effect of Different Substrates on Soil Microbial Community Structure and the Mechanisms of Reductive Soil Disinfestation.

Authors:  Xingyan Tan; Hongkai Liao; Liangzuo Shu; Huaiying Yao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.