Caitlin A Hester1, Ali El Mokdad1, John C Mansour1, Matthew R Porembka1, Adam C Yopp1, Herbert J Zeh1, Patricio M Polanco2. 1. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 2. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. Electronic address: patricio.polanco@utsouthwestern.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pringle maneuver (PM) is used for inflow vascular control during hepatectomy, but its use remains controversial. We aimed to report its pattern of use and association with postoperative outcomes. METHODS: We identified hepatectomy patients using the liver-targeted National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2014-2016). Associations between PM and posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), receipt of blood transfusion, and total hospital length of stay (LOS) were evaluated. RESULTS: We identified 7870 patients (74.9%) with no Pringle maneuver and 2632 (25.1%) with PM. PM patients were older (median age 61 versus 60 y, P = 0.002) and had higher ASA scores (76.1% versus 71.4% were ASA 3-4, P < 0.001). PM had more malignancy (83.0% versus 73.0%, P < 0.001), neoadjuvant therapy (37.7% versus 28.8%, P < 0.001), total lobectomy (30.6% versus 23.2%, P < 0.001), open resection (90.8% versus 74.9%, P < 0.001), and longer operations (246 min versus 212 min, P < 0.001). PM was associated with longer LOS (0.36 d, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.60) and increased risk of PHLF (odds ratio [OR] 1.36, 95% CI 1.11-1.66), although not clinically significant grade B/C PHLF (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.57-1.19), but was not associated with receipt of perioperative blood transfusions (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.69-1.64). CONCLUSIONS: PM is associated with similar clinically significant PHLF and transfusion requirements but longer LOS compared with no Pringle maneuver. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: Pringle maneuver (PM) is used for inflow vascular control during hepatectomy, but its use remains controversial. We aimed to report its pattern of use and association with postoperative outcomes. METHODS: We identified hepatectomy patients using the liver-targeted National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2014-2016). Associations between PM and posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), receipt of blood transfusion, and total hospital length of stay (LOS) were evaluated. RESULTS: We identified 7870 patients (74.9%) with no Pringle maneuver and 2632 (25.1%) with PM. PM patients were older (median age 61 versus 60 y, P = 0.002) and had higher ASA scores (76.1% versus 71.4% were ASA 3-4, P < 0.001). PM had more malignancy (83.0% versus 73.0%, P < 0.001), neoadjuvant therapy (37.7% versus 28.8%, P < 0.001), total lobectomy (30.6% versus 23.2%, P < 0.001), open resection (90.8% versus 74.9%, P < 0.001), and longer operations (246 min versus 212 min, P < 0.001). PM was associated with longer LOS (0.36 d, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.60) and increased risk of PHLF (odds ratio [OR] 1.36, 95% CI 1.11-1.66), although not clinically significant grade B/C PHLF (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.57-1.19), but was not associated with receipt of perioperative blood transfusions (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.69-1.64). CONCLUSIONS: PM is associated with similar clinically significant PHLF and transfusion requirements but longer LOS compared with no Pringle maneuver. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Jenna Silverberg; Thomas W Clements; Salila Hashmi; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Francis R Sutherland; Chad G Ball Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 2.840