Robert Slinger1, Kelly Amrud2, Nadia Sant3, Karam Ramotar4, Marc Desjardins5. 1. Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association, Canada; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: slinger@cheo.on.ca. 2. The Ottawa Hospital/The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Canada. Electronic address: kelly.amrud@mail.mcgill.ca. 3. Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital/The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Canada. Electronic address: nsant@toh.ca. 4. Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital/The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Canada. Electronic address: kramotar@toh.ca. 5. Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital/The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Canada. Electronic address: madesjardins@toh.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Molecular methods enable more rapid and sensitive detection of herpes simplex virus (HSV) than viral culture. OBJECTIVE: Three commercial molecular methods, all of which detect both HSV-1 and HSV-2, were compared to viral culture for the detection of HSV from swab specimens. STUDY DESIGN: Pediatric and adult patient viral swab specimens were cultured for HSV. Residual swab fluid was frozen at -80 °C until tested with the 3 molecular methods: the Quidel Solana HSV 1 + 2/VZV Assay, the Focus Diagnostics Simplexa HSV 1 & 2 Direct Assay and the Luminex Aries HSV 1&2 Assay. A true positive was defined as positive by culture or positive by ≥ 2/3 molecular methods. RESULTS: 177 specimens were studied. The sensitivity of culture was 81.3% (61/75, 95% CI 70.7-89.4%) and specificity was 100% (102/102, 95% CI 96.4-100%). The sensitivities of both the Solana and Simplexa were 100% (75/75, 95% CI 95.2-100%) and specificities were also both 100% (102/102, 95% CI 96.4-100%). The Aries had a sensitivity of 98.7% (74/75, 95% CI 92.8-99.97%) and specificity 99.0% (101/102, 95% CI 94.7-99.98%). All three molecular methods were significantly more sensitive than culture (p ≤ 0.0005 for Solana and Simplexa and p ≤ 0.0012 for Aries). CONCLUSION: All the molecular methods studied provided a significantly higher sensitivity than culture. In addition, the molecular methods took 1-2 hours to perform compared to a mean of 2.1 days for culture results. Use of any of the three molecular methods could lead to improved patient care.
BACKGROUND: Molecular methods enable more rapid and sensitive detection of herpes simplex virus (HSV) than viral culture. OBJECTIVE: Three commercial molecular methods, all of which detect both HSV-1 and HSV-2, were compared to viral culture for the detection of HSV from swab specimens. STUDY DESIGN: Pediatric and adult patient viral swab specimens were cultured for HSV. Residual swab fluid was frozen at -80 °C until tested with the 3 molecular methods: the Quidel Solana HSV 1 + 2/VZV Assay, the Focus Diagnostics Simplexa HSV 1 & 2 Direct Assay and the Luminex Aries HSV 1&2 Assay. A true positive was defined as positive by culture or positive by ≥ 2/3 molecular methods. RESULTS: 177 specimens were studied. The sensitivity of culture was 81.3% (61/75, 95% CI 70.7-89.4%) and specificity was 100% (102/102, 95% CI 96.4-100%). The sensitivities of both the Solana and Simplexa were 100% (75/75, 95% CI 95.2-100%) and specificities were also both 100% (102/102, 95% CI 96.4-100%). The Aries had a sensitivity of 98.7% (74/75, 95% CI 92.8-99.97%) and specificity 99.0% (101/102, 95% CI 94.7-99.98%). All three molecular methods were significantly more sensitive than culture (p ≤ 0.0005 for Solana and Simplexa and p ≤ 0.0012 for Aries). CONCLUSION: All the molecular methods studied provided a significantly higher sensitivity than culture. In addition, the molecular methods took 1-2 hours to perform compared to a mean of 2.1 days for culture results. Use of any of the three molecular methods could lead to improved patient care.
Authors: P Pancholi; R F Relich; S Chandrasekaran; J J Dunn; P A Granato; A T Harrington; G T Hansen; N A Ledeboer; Q Li; M D Sims; T S Uphoff; W Greene; S Young; N Dhiman Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2022-03-14 Impact factor: 11.677