Katherine A Duggan1, J Richard Jennings, Karen A Matthews. 1. From the Department of Psychiatry (Duggan), University of Pittsburgh; Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Pittsburgh (Jennings); and Departments of Psychiatry, Epidemiology, Psychology, and Clinical and Translational Science (Matthews), University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Conscientiousness predicts better psychological resources as well as lower cardiovascular mortality and lower metabolic syndrome (MetS) risk. However, the benefits of conscientiousness might be amplified, disabled, or reversed in disadvantaged groups. This study is the first to test these competing hypotheses for prospective associations between adolescent conscientiousness and adult psychological resources and MetS. METHOD: Participants were 220 men (54.6% black) from the Pittsburgh Youth Study. Adolescent conscientiousness (M [SD] age = 16 [1]) was rated by participants and their parents. Adult (M [SD] age = 32 [1]) socioeconomic status (SES; occupation and education), psychological resources (composite of positive affect, purpose in life, optimism, self-mastery, and self-esteem), and MetS scores (glucose, lipids, waist circumference, and blood pressure) were measured. Hierarchical regressions were used to evaluate the association of conscientiousness with adult psychological resources and MetS scores, with testing of moderation by race and SES. RESULTS: Self- and parent-reported conscientiousness were associated with better psychological resources (βs = 0.23-0.29, ps ≤ .015), with no moderation by race or socioeconomic status. In the full sample, a three-way interaction of self-reported conscientiousness, race, and SES was obtained for MetS (β = 0.12, p = .093). Subgroup analysis indicated that self-reported conscientiousness was related to higher MetS scores in low SES black men (βint = -0.22, p = .022), but there was no comparable linear (βs ≤ 0.08, ps ≥ .50) or interaction (βs ≤ -0.13 ps ≥ .25) pattern in white men. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent conscientiousness was beneficial for adult psychological resources, regardless of race or SES. However, there may be physiological costs of conscientiousness for black men from disadvantaged backgrounds.
OBJECTIVE: Conscientiousness predicts better psychological resources as well as lower cardiovascular mortality and lower metabolic syndrome (MetS) risk. However, the benefits of conscientiousness might be amplified, disabled, or reversed in disadvantaged groups. This study is the first to test these competing hypotheses for prospective associations between adolescent conscientiousness and adult psychological resources and MetS. METHOD:Participants were 220 men (54.6% black) from the Pittsburgh Youth Study. Adolescent conscientiousness (M [SD] age = 16 [1]) was rated by participants and their parents. Adult (M [SD] age = 32 [1]) socioeconomic status (SES; occupation and education), psychological resources (composite of positive affect, purpose in life, optimism, self-mastery, and self-esteem), and MetS scores (glucose, lipids, waist circumference, and blood pressure) were measured. Hierarchical regressions were used to evaluate the association of conscientiousness with adult psychological resources and MetS scores, with testing of moderation by race and SES. RESULTS: Self- and parent-reported conscientiousness were associated with better psychological resources (βs = 0.23-0.29, ps ≤ .015), with no moderation by race or socioeconomic status. In the full sample, a three-way interaction of self-reported conscientiousness, race, and SES was obtained for MetS (β = 0.12, p = .093). Subgroup analysis indicated that self-reported conscientiousness was related to higher MetS scores in low SES black men (βint = -0.22, p = .022), but there was no comparable linear (βs ≤ 0.08, ps ≥ .50) or interaction (βs ≤ -0.13 ps ≥ .25) pattern in white men. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent conscientiousness was beneficial for adult psychological resources, regardless of race or SES. However, there may be physiological costs of conscientiousness for black men from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Authors: Scott M Grundy; James I Cleeman; Stephen R Daniels; Karen A Donato; Robert H Eckel; Barry A Franklin; David J Gordon; Ronald M Krauss; Peter J Savage; Sidney C Smith; John A Spertus; Fernando Costa Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-09-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sarah E Hampson; Grant W Edmonds; Lewis R Goldberg; Joan P Dubanoski; Teresa A Hillier Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2015-01-26 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Karen A Matthews; Jennifer M Boylan; Karen P Jakubowski; Jenny M Cundiff; Laisze Lee; Dustin A Pardini; J Richard Jennings Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2017-05-22 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Mark C Thomas; Katherine A Duggan; Thomas W Kamarck; Aidan G C Wright; Matthew F Muldoon; Stephen B Manuck Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2022-01-01
Authors: Jules Ramon Brito Teixeira; Anderson Reis de Sousa; Emanuel Missias Silva Palma; Wanderson Carneiro Moreira; Thiago da Silva Santana; Nilo Manoel Pereira Vieira Barreto; Maciel Alves de Moura; Oscar Javier Vergara-Escobar; Oscar Yovani Fabián José; Gildásio Souza Pereira; Paulo Henrique Martins de Oliveira; Jacilene Santiago do Nascimento Trindade Dos Santos; Emerson Lucas Silva Camargo; Tânia Maria de Araújo; Isabel Amélia Costa Mendes; Carla Aparecida Arena Ventura; Evanilda Souza de Santana Carvalho; Álvaro Francisco Lopes de Sousa Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 3.390