Literature DB >> 30855169

The role of cross-sectional imaging in suspected nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

A Shayah1, L Wickstone1, E Kershaw1, F Agada1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a rare neoplasm in the UK. The current gold standard for detection is endoscopic examination under anaesthesia of the nasopharynx with biopsy. Many clinicians are now advocating cross-sectional imaging as the primary investigation. The objective of this study is to evaluate the role of cross-sectional imaging in detecting nasopharyngeal carcinoma and ultimately to avoid unnecessary biopsy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective uncontrolled case series review of patients who were investigated for suspected nasopharyngeal carcinoma between 2009 and 2017 at York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. At present, any suspected nasopharyngeal carcinoma requires biopsy. Search terms used were 'endoscopic biopsy of nasopharynx', 'endoscopic examination + biopsy nasopharynx'. The main outcome measures are reported histological and radiological features of malignancy. Only patients who had imaging prior to the biopsy were included.
RESULTS: A total of 144 patients had endoscopic examination under anaesthesia of the nasopharynx with biopsy. Approximately one-third of these patients had cross-sectional imaging before the biopsy. The study revealed that magnetic resonance imaging had 100% sensitivity and 84% specificity; however, the endoscopic examination under anaesthesia and biopsy had only 88% sensitivity. This is due to a negative histological finding despite radiological characteristics of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in some patients. However, the specificity was 100%.
CONCLUSION: The study supports magnetic resonance imaging as the primary investigation in patients with suspected nasopharyngeal carcinoma followed by endoscopic examination under anaesthesia and biopsy in cases with suspicious findings on imaging only.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance imaging; Nasopharyngeal neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30855169      PMCID: PMC6513359          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  7 in total

1.  Detection of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma by MR Imaging: Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI Compared with Endoscopy and Endoscopic Biopsy Based on Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  A D King; A C Vlantis; T W C Yuen; B K H Law; K S Bhatia; B C Y Zee; J K S Woo; A T C Chan; K C A Chan; A T Ahuja
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  The efficacy of fiberoptic endoscopic examination and biopsy in the detection of early nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  W I Wei; J S Sham; Y S Zong; D Choy; M H Ng
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  MRI of local disease in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: tumour extent vs tumour stage.

Authors:  A D King; W W Lam; S F Leung; Y L Chan; P Teo; C Metreweli
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Fiberoptic endoscopic examination and biopsy in determining the extent of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  J S Sham; W I Wei; W H Kwan; C W Chan; P H Choi; D Choy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma: diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging versus that of endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy.

Authors:  Ann D King; Alexander C Vlantis; Kunwar S S Bhatia; Benny C Y Zee; John K S Woo; Gary M K Tse; Anthony T C Chan; Anil T Ahuja
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Staging and follow-up of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: magnetic resonance imaging versus computerized tomography.

Authors:  P Olmi; C Fallai; S Colagrande; G Giannardi
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines.

Authors:  R Simo; M Robinson; M Lei; A Sibtain; S Hickey
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.469

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Early Detection of Cancer: Evaluation of MR Imaging Grading Systems in Patients with Suspected Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  A D King; J K S Woo; Q-Y Ai; F K F Mo; T Y So; W K J Lam; I O L Tse; A C Vlantis; K W N Yip; E P Hui; B B Y Ma; R W K Chiu; A T C Chan; Y M D Lo; K C A Chan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  MRI detection of suspected nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vineet Vijay Gorolay; Naomi Natasha Niles; Ya Ruth Huo; Navid Ahmadi; Kate Hanneman; Elizabeth Thompson; Michael Vinchill Chan
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.995

3.  Prediction of Changes in Tumor Regression during Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma by Using the Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics.

Authors:  Yu Yang; Jiayang Wu; Wenfeng Mai; Hengguo Li
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.009

4.  An Integrated Analysis of mRNAs and miRNAs Microarray Profiles to Screen miRNA Signatures Involved in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Hailing Wang; Chaohui Yan; Shudong Tao
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.